Rad replacment, anyone?





If you did it yourself, how difficult was it? I know this is a subjective question, but I’ve done brakes, shocks on a few different cars, and R&R’d the diff on my 64 vette once. Had the engine, tranny, and rad out of my Sunbeam Tiger a couple of times, replaced the PS unit on my Aurora as examples, so I used to be able to work on stuff, and it all ran, stopped and steered afterwards.
The original rad is aluminum less the side tanks. It's plenty for most, any reason why you want to upgrade? You could start with a 160 degree stat and get the fans to engage a little earlier with a tune.





If you must replace the rad, get a quality piece like dewitts. I see you're in TO so we have similar weather so I can assure you you'll benefit greatly from a 160 stat.
Last edited by rpmextra; Dec 3, 2017 at 12:48 AM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Avalanches are actually known for having clogged up heater cores. Had many customers complain about poor heat and after flushing the core out it was night and day. Not saying the 160stat is ideal for winter because it isn'.... But neither is driving a corvette in winter up here. Actually dangerous as hell is what it is.





Avalanches are actually known for having clogged up heater cores. Had many customers complain about poor heat and after flushing the core out it was night and day. Not saying the 160stat is ideal for winter because it isn'.... But neither is driving a corvette in winter up here. Actually dangerous as hell is what it is.

Maybe you can explain how the 160 stat would help on a long, hot drive. The way I figure it, the coolant runs up to stat temp, and then remains more or less there until the rad can no longer dump all of the heat being generated. As the coolant temp rises above that point, the differential between coolant and ambient increases, and therefore so does the rate of heat transfer, until a new equilibrium point is reached, one that is hopefully not above max allowed. As another observation, because there was no salt yet on the QEW, and it was a nice day last Tuesday (I think Tuesday), I went for what will probably be the last drive of the year. It was cool, around 7C, and it took 1/2 hour for the oil to come up to temp. Pretty sure it would have taken longer with a 160 stat.
What I figured was that the aftermarket rads would keep the coolant at stat temperature longer, and reduce the differential above that such that it would be very difficult to overheat. As you point out, it does get plenty hot here, particularly if you are on one of the 400 series highways basking in the heat generated by about a million other cars up front. And, unless you're driving late at night, there are always a million cars up front. Well maybe not a million, but you get the idea. From the fount of all knowledge "The segment of Highway 401 passing through Toronto is not only the busiest highway in North America but also one of the widest and busiest in the world. Mar 31, 2011" Once you get outside of TO heading towards Quebec, if you are not doing at least 130Kph (81 mph), you are not keeping up. Except for a few known spots, traffic enforcement is non-existent; sad but true. This being the case pretty much everywhere here. You almost never see a traffic stop. While it's nice to see the country side, and play on the windy roads in central Ontario, you still need to get there.
I also plan to drive what's left of Rt 66 in the spring / summer, and it looks like there's some 'hot spots' to traverse there as well.
A direct fit rad will be limited in size and will increase cooling effefiency without a doubt but I do feel not as much as what I mentioned. We don`t have room to go all nuts on core side so a rad upgrade would likely be minimal.
Your 7c drive the other day you are correct it will take a bit longer, but I have pushed my car and seen oil temps quite a bit higher than the coolant temps. I think for what you are wanting to do, lower temps and worry less about traffic and busy highways for long periods of time, you need to make a small sacrifice to achieve your wants like everything else. Can`t have a very sticky tire that lasts forever.
At 20$ a thermostat is a easy swap at maybe 30min and a coolant top off. much less than a rad replacement with minimal results to an already efficient system. Here`s during a 4hr cruise to quebec city oil temps at 68c and coolant nice and low.





A direct fit rad will be limited in size and will increase cooling effefiency without a doubt but I do feel not as much as what I mentioned. We don`t have room to go all nuts on core side so a rad upgrade would likely be minimal.
Your 7c drive the other day you are correct it will take a bit longer, but I have pushed my car and seen oil temps quite a bit higher than the coolant temps. I think for what you are wanting to do, lower temps and worry less about traffic and busy highways for long periods of time, you need to make a small sacrifice to achieve your wants like everything else. Can`t have a very sticky tire that lasts forever.
At 20$ a thermostat is a easy swap at maybe 30min and a coolant top off. much less than a rad replacement with minimal results to an already efficient system. Here`s during a 4hr cruise to quebec city oil temps at 68c and coolant nice and low.
On the drive mentioned above, my oil temp stabilized at 104C, cruising at 120Kph (75 Mph). This to me was exactly right. When I slowed down a bit, the oil temp dropped. On the other hand, on your longer trip, your oil temp didn't exceed 68C, which to me may actually be doing your engine more harm then good, and probably dropping your fuel economy too. I'm sure that there's lots of debate around these issues. Right now, I'm just investigating to see if I'm going to need more cooling capacity based on where and how I plan to drive, and what to do about it if I do. I do appreciate your views, and those of others.





On the drive mentioned above, my oil temp stabilized at 104C, cruising at 120Kph (75 Mph). This to me was exactly right. When I slowed down a bit, the oil temp dropped. On the other hand, on your longer trip, your oil temp didn't exceed 68C, which to me may actually be doing your engine more harm then good, and probably dropping your fuel economy too. I'm sure that there's lots of debate around these issues. Right now, I'm just investigating to see if I'm going to need more cooling capacity based on where and how I plan to drive, and what to do about it if I do. I do appreciate your views, and those of others.
On another note, my car get its engine oil replaced often and sees the track plenty as its more of a weekend street&strip warrior than a daily commuter. So it gets put through its paces and sees heat and high rpm on the regular.
I purposely stay away from traffic with it but do take it to work from time to time. At the track we attempt to keep the engine oil warm but the coolant and intake cool.
I guess if you're thinking your temps are perfect, I don't understand why the need to upgrade. I am also curious if the C7 rad just fit right in.
For the money, I’d take the added capacity of the DeWitts. I’ll be adding that to mine. Things were a little toasty on track this summer. Coolant temp is far left...
Last edited by 96GS#007; Dec 3, 2017 at 07:28 PM.





On another note, my car get its engine oil replaced often and sees the track plenty as its more of a weekend street&strip warrior than a daily commuter. So it gets put through its paces and sees heat and high rpm on the regular.
I purposely stay away from traffic with it but do take it to work from time to time. At the track we attempt to keep the engine oil warm but the coolant and intake cool.
I guess if you're thinking your temps are perfect, I don't understand why the need to upgrade. I am also curious if the C7 rad just fit right in.












