When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Any thoughts on how compatible the new LS2 motor will be for existing 6.0 SUV's and replacing LS1/LS6 motors in cars.
I've been through an LS6 install and other than the oil pan / some custom gaskets to protect the aluminum block and some program gremlins, it worked out nice.
I would bet you could recoup the cost differential from the iron block high output 6.0 just in improved gas milage alone over the life of the motor. Because I can honestly say that the LS6 powered Yukon is much more fuel efficient than our Silvarado SS.
Re: LS2/LS7 crate assemblies for swaps / replacements (cokeman)
I agree that this would be a "fun" swap, i.e. "fun to drive" but I seriously doubt that you could ever recoup the money, and I know you would never recoup it on a net present value basis.
Re: LS2/LS7 crate assemblies for swaps / replacements (Timmy's C5)
I was just wondering if everyone thinks that motor mounts and bolt pattens and accessaries will be consistent with the current 6.0.
On the gas milage thing:
Well the vehicles are similar in weights but the Yukon came in about 170 pounds less with the LS6/no cat. (4480)
Both trucks are 4wd/4.10's but the SS has the higher rated '65' trans. and bigger tires and no bed cover. I really needed to put a converter and exhaust on the Yukon but I ran out of cash and figured I would do it later. The SS gets about 12-13/17 mpg and Yukon gets 14/21 mpg. The Yukon is faster too.
Honestly, I hope the LS2 is a more efficient engine than the current HO 6.0(not just more powerful) becuase I feel guilty putting gas in ALL the time(not as guilty as some of my friends who ride around empty all the time in their cummings/duramax monsters). Oh well, such is america i guess.