When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I think you are referring to a "dual mass flywheel". Although I've not read in a reliable source that C6 has such, a dual mass flywheel is a two piece design separated by a rubber ring - similar in construction to the a typical torsional damper at the front of the crankshaft.
A dual mass flywheel accomplishes the same thing - damps out torsional vibrations and theoretially makes the drivetrain smoother, but IMO represents a long term maintenance/repair issue as the rubber deteriorates.
not clutch.
Uses a spring loaded flywheel to absorb driveline
shocks.
Better than the c5's restrictive hydraulic lines that slowed
clutch engagement and fried clutches.
My understand was that they were going to use a dual mass, but are no longer doing so. This was the reason for the wheelbase increase (deeper bellhousing). But, my understanding is no it is a single clutch...
My understand was that they were going to use a dual mass, but are no longer doing so. This was the reason for the wheelbase increase (deeper bellhousing). But, my understanding is no it is a single clutch...
Actually, the longer wheelbase is for the XLR's 5-speed automatic.
Hmmmm, ok well, my understanding of things was bit different.... This come from a conversations someone had with powertrain engineers working on the C6. The question related to many of the driveline components.
Almost everything is identical (drivetrain wise). The exception is the bellhousing which is 1 inch longer for the dual mass flywheel which has now been abandoned. But, even though it has been abandoned, the wheel base remained. Otherwise my understanding is, the wheelbase would not have been stretched 1"...
No mention was made about XLR parts, etc in this decision...
I don't think "losing" the dual mass flywheel is any loss at all because they can represent a long term repair issue when the rubber disintegrates.
I recall a friend in the late seventies who bought a new 911. Porsche replaced the mechanical spring/damper assembly in the clutch disk with a big rubber bushing, and you can imagine what happened, Yep, it disintegrated after a few years and 20K miles or so (he did not drive it every day).
Porsche quickly abandoned what was a really STUPID idea!