When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Well, I have seen two C6 rear wheel dyno graphs on this forum now from vendors I would trust with numbers. The horsepower number appears to be right on from GM for the LS2....However, the torque isn't there!!! I was one of the ones who was absolutely positive GM is underrating this motor and I have to say I am disappointed. Anyone want to take a stab at why the torque doesn't make the numbers, given the cam numbers, known head design and larger displacement? Anyone think GM has a much more intrusive torque managment program in the PCM doing the dirty work?
It will be interesting to watch the developments over the next several months from our forum vendors, of whom, LGM should have headers on one right now and graphs up soon.....
I agree. The numbers I've seen so far are a fair bitl off the 02-04 Z06 numbers, in spite of the HP graphs GM released. The numbers seem to be in the same range as what the 385/385 01 Z06's make. However, these cars are still very low mileage and I'm sure they'll free up once broken in. Still though, I did expect to see more after seeing the now famous LS2 vs. LS6 dyno graph.
Well, I have seen two C6 rear wheel dyno graphs on this forum now from vendors I would trust with numbers. The horsepower number appears to be right on from GM for the LS2....However, the torque isn't there!!!
Todd
Could you explain this for me. Not being a mechanic or engineer, I'm a bit ignorant on this. I thought horsepower was a calculated value (torque x rpm/5252). If the horsepower on the dyno is good, why isn't the torque?
I agree. The numbers I've seen so far are a fair bitl off the 02-04 Z06 numbers, in spite of the HP graphs GM released. The numbers seem to be in the same range as what the 385/385 01 Z06's make. However, these cars are still very low mileage and I'm sure they'll free up once broken in. Still though, I did expect to see more after seeing the now famous LS2 vs. LS6 dyno graph.
I agree and I need to add that even low milage 2001 Z06 dynos show the power that the new LS2 is making. I don't believe this is an issue with low milage, but that the LS2 is not making the torque I suspected it should. It has LS6 heads, higher compression than the LS6, the 2001 LS6 cam, better exhaust and more intake, but it doesn't make better numbers with more displacement.
DTE posted a dyno graph for a C6 a while back. It was low on torque as well.(using 15 to 17% loss, the torque is close, but less than 400 flywheel).
Oh, I want to add to that speculation that GM purposely is holding tuning back on the LS2 is very welcome. I believe that the new C6 should easily run with the last Z06, so maybe GM did this on purpose. Either way, our C6 is now at least 1 year down the road.
I think that the engine is stopped up with a restrictive exhaust and has an overly conservative tune. They don't want to outclass the C5 Z06 after all.
I think that you'll see some great gains from headers, exhaust and a tune once someone can tune the LS2.
I think that the engine is stopped up with a restrictive exhaust and has an overly conservative tune. They don't want to outclass the C5 Z06 after all.
I think that you'll see some great gains from headers, exhaust and a tune once someone can tune the LS2.
X
LGM has all ready installed their long tubes on a C6 and got some nice gains. However, those gains are similar to the C5 with the same headers. I don't think the LS2 suffers from a more restrictive exhaust(it should actually flow better with the cat back portion being much straighter).
It is nice to see a mod that was effective on the C5 as effective on the C6. We should see some nice power levels off of these first C6s by the end of the year.
Could you explain this for me. Not being a mechanic or engineer, I'm a bit ignorant on this. I thought horsepower was a calculated value (torque x rpm/5252). If the horsepower on the dyno is good, why isn't the torque?
TIA
Correct. The dyno measures torque and calculates horsepower. It's kinda silly to like the horsepower curve and hate the torque.
If the C6 has a better horsepower curve than the C5 then it also has a better torque curve. You can't have one without the other.