When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
With all the extreme focus on 1/4 mile ets, I have a
quiz I'd like to pose.
1. Which would you rather have: a vette which runs
consistent 12.5s @ 111 mph or a vette which runs
consistent 12.9s @ 117 mph? Assume same tires,
track, car weight, etc.
From: I was a young troubadour when I rode in on a song, and I'll be an old troubadour when I'm gone.
St. Jude Donor '08
117 is faster than 111.
12.5 is quicker than 12.9.
Quick and fast are two different things.
That being said, I would think that as close as those numbers are, you would notice little, if any, difference in seat of the pants feeling at a track.
Trap speed is typically a better indicator of horsepower than is E.T.
True, but that full FOUR TENTHS of a second difference is a far bigger indicator of a true kick in the *** from a dead dig...I'll take the 12.5s thank you.
The truth is, as alluded to above, a 117 mph trap speed is easily an 11 second car with some tires under it.
117. The truth is, damn few people run for ultimate acceleration from a dead stop on the street. The 117 would indicate that the car is significanlty faster once rolling.
If drag racing is your thing, the lower et wins every time. But if street driving is your thing, the higher trap speed is a better indicator of how the car will really run in typical driving. BTW, I'm not above an impromtu run against someone esle on the street if conditions permit, and I can say that 98% of the time is while already rolling - not from a dead stop.
117 is faster than 111.
12.5 is quicker than 12.9.
Quick and fast are two different things.
That being said, I would think that as close as those numbers are, you would notice little, if any, difference in seat of the pants feeling at a track.
The difference between 111 and 117 is huge. You damn sure would feel that!
The difference between 111 and 117 is huge. You damn sure would feel that!
You'd feel it for sure. And going down the track it would look different from behind the wheel too. 6mph difference in trap speed represents a big difference in horsepower. I would also consider new tires to take advantage of that kind of power.
It only took 12.5 sec to reach 111 mph for the first car in the 1/4 mile while it took 12.9sec for the second car to reach 117 in the same distance.
How much faster is the first car going in that same 12.9 sec. I bet a lot faster than 117mph.
I'll take the first.
Bye Bye.
You think the first car is going to go from 111 MPH to [a lot faster than] 117 MPH in 0.4 seconds? That's one helluva car! Pulling .64 G's of acceleration at 110 MPH. Now THAT'S a car!
This one is pretty simple:
12.5 @ 111: car that is set up well and getting good traction
Yes, the higher mph car is the one which "pulls"
harder. 117mph in the 1/4 means the car is pulling
significantly harder than the 111mph car.
Think of it this way: low ets are a function of how hard
the car launches. Trap speeds are the best indicator of
the power to weight ratio of the car.
Imagine sitting at a christmas tree. The light goes green.
You sit there for 2 seconds then launch. That same 12.9
car will now be running a 14.9 et but will still hit 117mph.
This is analogous to what happens when your wheels spin
at the launch. You are essentially "wasting" time at the
start but it won't significantly affect your trap speed.
Or look at it another way: if you spin your tire like crazy
for the first 30 feet then hook up, you are basically only
accelerating at max potential for 1320-30 feet. You lose
30 feet of track. How will that affect the trap speed? Well,
how much mph gain do you expect over the final 30 feet
at the end of the 1/4 mile? Remember you're travelling
over 115 mph. Even if you weren't accelerating any more,
you'd cover than space in 0.17 seconds. You aren't going
to add to your trap speed in 0.17 seconds when you're
already doing 115mph.
I'd take the 117mph car. It will pull much harder.
Take into consideration the 60'. My '95 six speed is faster, but my '93 auto is quicker. The difference? How about 3 tenths in the 60'. We're talking nearly yanking the front wheels off the ground.
Your et's can vary, this past weekend, I had 5 runs, 4 were 12.50 one was 12.60, the MPH were all 107.75 with one run at 108.
The difference is that the 111 MPH car "slammed" hard off the line for the first few yards (maybe 10 yards). For the rest of the ride (over 4 football fields), the 117 MPH car pulled harder. So which will you notice more? Depends on what you are looking for. The 111 MPH car pulled harder for the first 1.5 seconds of the ride while the 117 MPH car pulled harder for the last 11 seconds. Would you prefer the initial 1.5 second jolt, or the sustained 11 seconds after that where the 117 MPH car is accelerating faster?
Another way to look at it... if you do a rolling start where both cars are already going 25 MPH (or more), the 117 MPH car wins every time.
The difference is that the 111 MPH car "slammed" hard off the line for the first few yards (maybe 10 yards). For the rest of the ride (over 4 football fields), the 117 MPH car pulled harder. So which will you notice more? Depends on what you are looking for. The 111 MPH car pulled harder for the first 1.5 seconds of the ride while the 117 MPH car pulled harder for the last 11 seconds. Would you prefer the initial 1.5 second jolt, or the sustained 11 seconds after that where the 117 MPH car is accelerating faster?
Another way to look at it... if you do a rolling start where both cars are already going 25 MPH (or more), the 117 MPH car wins every time.
True.
But regardless of all that, in the end, who won the drag race?
You think the first car is going to go from 111 MPH to [a lot faster than] 117 MPH in 0.4 seconds? That's one helluva car! Pulling .64 G's of acceleration at 110 MPH. Now THAT'S a car!
This one is pretty simple:
12.5 @ 111: car that is set up well and getting good traction
12.9 @ 117: car with more power that needs tires.
Mike
I can't argue with that, I went on a test run this morning to test your theory and it is appearently true.
In the additional .4-.5 sec the car continued accelerating to 115-116 mph. Top speed timed run 12.9 sec 115-116 mph.
So is the difference appears to be 1 mph at the same et 12.9 sec.
The distance covered would be 1,406ft for the first car or 85 feet further in the same elapsed time.
Last edited by bangbgC6; Nov 19, 2004 at 01:48 PM.