When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It was a slow night, so I pulled the wheels and lowered my car as much as the 4 adjusting bolts allow without removing or cutting the spacers. I don't know of any real value, but I figured since I will likely have some suspension work done this spring anyway, there is little risk. But now I am curious about the intended purpose and value of the OE adjustment. I don't imagine the engineers were sitting around trying to figure out what to do with a bunch of refrigerator feet, and decided to screw'em in Corvette springs! With the spring on top of the control arm, lowering it will, I guess, slightly lessen the tension on the control arm, which is the last thing the front suspension needs. Anyway, just curious if anyone has done any investigation, with folks who know, about these adjustments.
Ed
The "OE" adjustments are just for that....like camber, castor, toe.
The OE "screws" are for ride height.
All things being equal and perfect in the manufacturing process there would be no need for adjustments of ANY kind!
However...that's not the case.
It's cool, that GM - by using "transverse leaf springs", is able to accomodate such an adjustment. Otherwise you would need(discounting torsion bar suspension) "coil over shocks" to accomplish the same thing.
Racers use coil overs to adjust ride height and weight distriution. You COULD do the same in your vette, to a degree; that being the amount of adjustment available to you via the "screws".
Tis a good thing....thanks to The General for giving us the adjustment.
.
.
.
Last edited by natejohn; Jan 14, 2005 at 02:56 PM.
The factory settings on ride height and alignment embody a set of trade-offs designed for a 'typical customer' operating with typical street driving requirements. Thus, safety, cost, covenience and performance are all considered.
What does this all mean? For example, those trade-offs would go out the window if we wanted to race a C6 on a road race course wheel-to-wheel in VVC (Vette Viper Challenge) or T1. You would see the lowest practical ride height, spring rates would shoot up, camber would start a test session at -2 degrees static not -0.5 which is what the car shipped with, etc....
How to proceed? I think the vette is a great platform as shipped. Would I lower my street vette? Yes, especially on the C6 (it has more travel to begin with) and a lower Cg will help with handling. Would I dial in more aggressive alignment settings? Yup...
Since there are no free lunches in the world of Physics---just trade-offs...what is going to happen? Well tire wear will increase, you will not clear all the bumps in every parking lot, etc...
That's the quick version of what we get into when we make these changes...
Is there enough adjustment in the suspension to accommodate the maximum amount of lowering one can achieve through the adjustments at the springs and still bring it into factory street specs upon realignment(I would assume the car would need realigned)?