At
GM said it will invest $204 million in that plant for production of a new eight-speed automatic transmission. The company didn't say what future vehicles would get the new transmission.
Above link is different than OP's. Says they are doing it to meet more stringent expected fuel economy standards, and mentions competitors BMW and Mercedes Benz, but I think MB is a 7 speed and the BMW is a 6-spd DCT.
There is no mention of DCT for the GM 8 speed, which probably means conventional design with lockup torque converter, as would thus be more similar to what Lexus offers in the LS and IS-F. The 8-spd transmission in the Lexus IS-F shifts nearly as quick as the DCT in the BMW or the PDQ in the Porsche, but without the weight and reliability concerns. So it sounds like a mass market approach, probably applicable to the C7 but unlikely to satisfy those looking for a dual clutch automatic like the GTR, Ferrari, Porsche or BMW.
If the C7 is truly going to be all new, will they abandon the front engine, rear transmission layout? Perhaps a mid engine coupe shares more commonality with a FWD transaxle design.
While I can't answer, I believe the major change in the $230M upgrade to the Bowling Green facility will be the death knell to the composite body panel structure, and herald in an aluminum body monocoque.
My $0.02
Above link is different than OP's. Says they are doing it to meet more stringent expected fuel economy standards, and mentions competitors BMW and Mercedes Benz, but I think MB is a 7 speed and the BMW is a 6-spd DCT.
There is no mention of DCT for the GM 8 speed, which probably means conventional design with lockup torque converter, as would thus be more similar to what Lexus offers in the LS and IS-F. The 8-spd transmission in the Lexus IS-F shifts nearly as quick as the DCT in the BMW or the PDQ in the Porsche, but without the weight and reliability concerns. So it sounds like a mass market approach, probably applicable to the C7 but unlikely to satisfy those looking for a dual clutch automatic like the GTR, Ferrari, Porsche or BMW.
If the C7 is truly going to be all new, will they abandon the front engine, rear transmission layout? Perhaps a mid engine coupe shares more commonality with a FWD transaxle design.
While I can't answer, I believe the major change in the $230M upgrade to the Bowling Green facility will be the death knell to the composite body panel structure, and herald in an aluminum body monocoque.
My $0.02
Above link is different than OP's. Says they are doing it to meet more stringent expected fuel economy standards, and mentions competitors BMW and Mercedes Benz, but I think MB is a 7 speed and the BMW is a 6-spd DCT.
There is no mention of DCT for the GM 8 speed, which probably means conventional design with lockup torque converter, as would thus be more similar to what Lexus offers in the LS and IS-F. The 8-spd transmission in the Lexus IS-F shifts nearly as quick as the DCT in the BMW or the PDQ in the Porsche, but without the weight and reliability concerns. So it sounds like a mass market approach, probably applicable to the C7 but unlikely to satisfy those looking for a dual clutch automatic like the GTR, Ferrari, Porsche or BMW.
If the C7 is truly going to be all new, will they abandon the front engine, rear transmission layout? Perhaps a mid engine coupe shares more commonality with a FWD transaxle design.
While I can't answer, I believe the major change in the $230M upgrade to the Bowling Green facility will be the death knell to the composite body panel structure, and herald in an aluminum body monocoque.
My $0.02
It is not used as a visible bare surface like CF is but IMO the all one color Z06 is a better looking car than the ZR1 is with its visible CF roof
The C7 would have to be a heck of a sport car to compete with either these worldclass cars. Both have DCT, AWD and turbo V8s. I do not think Chevrolet has gain the technology in the powertain, suspension and AWD to be able to compete with either of these brands. But they can take it one step at a time like they did with the CTS and begin showing results.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
The C7 would have to be a heck of a sport car to compete with either these worldclass cars. Both have DCT, AWD and turbo V8s. I do not think Chevrolet has gain the technology in the powertain, suspension and AWD to be able to compete with either of these brands. But they can take it one step at a time like they did with the CTS and begin showing results.
The challenge for GM is not to try and match Germany, Italy and Japan feature for feature, a task it will surely lose. The challenge is to not screw up what they already do well, which is give competitive performance at a lower price point using the traditional methods, and satisfy the existing segment.
If GM tries to match technologies in areas they don't do well, and abandon the conventional hot rodding that got the Corvette where it is, it will be over. We'll be stuck with camaros, mustangs, and maybe the viper takes the top spot as America's iconic sports car. The Viper by the way, is another car that throughout its history has out matched the German and Italians with basic low tech performance.
The challenge for GM is not to try and match Germany, Italy and Japan feature for feature, a task it will surely lose. The challenge is to not screw up what they already do well, which is give competitive performance at a lower price point using the traditional methods, and satisfy the existing segment.
If GM tries to match technologies in areas they don't do well, and abandon the conventional hot rodding that got the Corvette where it is, it will be over. We'll be stuck with camaros, mustangs, and maybe the viper takes the top spot as America's iconic sports car. The Viper by the way, is another car that throughout its history has out matched the German and Italians with basic low tech performance.
General Motors
"All roads are open," said Uwe Grebe, Executive Director, GM Powertrain Global Advanced Engineering. In addition to widespread use of transmissions with eight speeds or more, GM will continue with cylinder deactivation.
Company engineers will increase use of variable valve activation, engine downsizing and boosting—including two-stage turbocharging. It will also employ advanced combustion systems—particularly direct injection—for gasoline engines. Grebe did not exclude HCCI (homogeneous charge compression ignition), although other panelists said the light load region for this technology might be shrinking as a result of other changes.
Perhaps the GM vehicle technology introduction that garnered the most attention since the Chevrolet Volt has been the E-Assist for the 2012 Buick LaCrosse. Grebe explained it is a much higher-performance version of GM's BAS (belt alternator-starter) system, and said it increases fuel economy 25% over the conventional 2.4-L four-cylinder—from 19 mpg city/30 mpg highway to 25/37.
E-Assist has a 115-V lithium-ion battery pack (vs. 42-V nickel metal hydride for the previous BAS) and a 15-hp (11 kW)/79 lb·ft. (107 N·m) electric motor that provides increased acceleration assist and regenerative braking vs. the previous BAS. Because of the powerful motor, LaCrosse can use an aggressive deceleration-to-stop fuel cutoff strategy as well as idle stop-start.
GM also will deploy idle stop-start on conventional 12-V models, Grebe said.
Diesels are an important part of the picture for GM, Grebe noted. He said the company has advanced engineering programs under way for improvements in aftertreatment systems, fuel charging, and combustion—the latter including new fuel injectors, turbochargers, and exhaust gas recirculation.















