Could this be it..
#261
Racer
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Weston Florida
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fantastic! I CAN DRIVE THE C7 ON SNOW!!
but really, way too close to jalopnik! although the rear bumper/decklid shape looks a little different.
Things I noticed:
-there is a seam across the roof above the b-pillar. that means there 'should' be a removable targa roof!-looks like LED taillights with clear lenses.
-ridiculously evolutionary.
but really, way too close to jalopnik! although the rear bumper/decklid shape looks a little different.
Things I noticed:
-there is a seam across the roof above the b-pillar. that means there 'should' be a removable targa roof!-looks like LED taillights with clear lenses.
-ridiculously evolutionary.
#262
I think the speculation towards AWD may actually be true. The car does not appear to be trans formative. If all of the engineering efforts were applied to AWD, it would be logical for a less radical body style.
If the top end Corvettes are going to go beyond the current horsepower, they will need AWD. That C7 in the snow may foreshadow that GM is ready to compete at the supercar level. You cannot get 0-60 in 2.9 without AWD. Look at the Ring times between the Z06 and Zr1. I dont see 638hp beating 500hp by less than 2 seconds unless most of the ZR1 extra hp is unusable. Going to 700 or better will not change physics. Traction coming from 4 wheels instead of 2 is the best way to get better Ring results. AWD just feels right to me, even though it would go against tradition.
If the top end Corvettes are going to go beyond the current horsepower, they will need AWD. That C7 in the snow may foreshadow that GM is ready to compete at the supercar level. You cannot get 0-60 in 2.9 without AWD. Look at the Ring times between the Z06 and Zr1. I dont see 638hp beating 500hp by less than 2 seconds unless most of the ZR1 extra hp is unusable. Going to 700 or better will not change physics. Traction coming from 4 wheels instead of 2 is the best way to get better Ring results. AWD just feels right to me, even though it would go against tradition.
#263
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: North Dallas 40 TX
Posts: 6,468
Received 4,383 Likes
on
2,070 Posts
Does anyone think there is a little more credibility to the add rumors that were initially floating around? Of course this could just be temperature testing, but there is a chance that the C7 will at least offer one performance model with awd to remain competitive amongst younger buyers.
#265
Racer
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Weston Florida
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the speculation towards AWD may actually be true. The car does not appear to be trans formative. If all of the engineering efforts were applied to AWD, it would be logical for a less radical body style.
If the top end Corvettes are going to go beyond the current horsepower, they will need AWD. That C7 in the snow may foreshadow that GM is ready to compete at the supercar level. You cannot get 0-60 in 2.9 without AWD. Look at the Ring times between the Z06 and Zr1. I dont see 638hp beating 500hp by less than 2 seconds unless most of the ZR1 extra hp is unusable. Going to 700 or better will not change physics. Traction coming from 4 wheels instead of 2 is the best way to get better Ring results. AWD just feels right to me, even though it would go against tradition.
If the top end Corvettes are going to go beyond the current horsepower, they will need AWD. That C7 in the snow may foreshadow that GM is ready to compete at the supercar level. You cannot get 0-60 in 2.9 without AWD. Look at the Ring times between the Z06 and Zr1. I dont see 638hp beating 500hp by less than 2 seconds unless most of the ZR1 extra hp is unusable. Going to 700 or better will not change physics. Traction coming from 4 wheels instead of 2 is the best way to get better Ring results. AWD just feels right to me, even though it would go against tradition.
With all due respect to the traditionalists that like to kick the rear end loose with their right foot, I'm ready for four-corner vectored steering and twice the contact patch for a big boost in launch acceleration and rain performance.
Lets put all the power down.
Last edited by Z06Doc; 02-05-2012 at 05:57 PM. Reason: typo
#267
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
I think the speculation towards AWD may actually be true. The car does not appear to be trans formative. If all of the engineering efforts were applied to AWD, it would be logical for a less radical body style.
If the top end Corvettes are going to go beyond the current horsepower, they will need AWD. That C7 in the snow may foreshadow that GM is ready to compete at the supercar level. You cannot get 0-60 in 2.9 without AWD. Look at the Ring times between the Z06 and Zr1. I dont see 638hp beating 500hp by less than 2 seconds unless most of the ZR1 extra hp is unusable. Going to 700 or better will not change physics. Traction coming from 4 wheels instead of 2 is the best way to get better Ring results. AWD just feels right to me, even though it would go against tradition.
If the top end Corvettes are going to go beyond the current horsepower, they will need AWD. That C7 in the snow may foreshadow that GM is ready to compete at the supercar level. You cannot get 0-60 in 2.9 without AWD. Look at the Ring times between the Z06 and Zr1. I dont see 638hp beating 500hp by less than 2 seconds unless most of the ZR1 extra hp is unusable. Going to 700 or better will not change physics. Traction coming from 4 wheels instead of 2 is the best way to get better Ring results. AWD just feels right to me, even though it would go against tradition.
What am I missing here? "GM is ready to compete at the supercar level"???
I seem to recall that the Corvette was ALREADY leading the supercars around by their noses. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the ZR1 putting a hurting on just about every single supercar out there? Didn't Lamborghini have to come up with the Aventador just to keep up with the Jones'? Hmmm... I think that qualifies as competing at supercar levels.
While I don't want to say whether or not AWD is better for racing performance, I will say that if you take a car like the Corvette and give it AWD, you have to remove something to fit it. In this case, you'll be removing the fun. Because there's no room for fun or skill and still keep the weight down after putting in AWD.
Seriously? If you keep putting b!tch controls in and STILL need AWD, you need to buy another car. The Active Handling system on the Corvette is amazing. Even pro drivers benefit from it. But there's really no need for AWD unless you simply do not know how to control your right foot.
#268
Um, what???
What am I missing here? "GM is ready to compete at the supercar level"???
I seem to recall that the Corvette was ALREADY leading the supercars around by their noses. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the ZR1 putting a hurting on just about every single supercar out there? Didn't Lamborghini have to come up with the Aventador just to keep up with the Jones'? Hmmm... I think that qualifies as competing at supercar levels.
While I don't want to say whether or not AWD is better for racing performance, I will say that if you take a car like the Corvette and give it AWD, you have to remove something to fit it. In this case, you'll be removing the fun. Because there's no room for fun or skill and still keep the weight down after putting in AWD.
Seriously? If you keep putting b!tch controls in and STILL need AWD, you need to buy another car. The Active Handling system on the Corvette is amazing. Even pro drivers benefit from it. But there's really no need for AWD unless you simply do not know how to control your right foot.
What am I missing here? "GM is ready to compete at the supercar level"???
I seem to recall that the Corvette was ALREADY leading the supercars around by their noses. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the ZR1 putting a hurting on just about every single supercar out there? Didn't Lamborghini have to come up with the Aventador just to keep up with the Jones'? Hmmm... I think that qualifies as competing at supercar levels.
While I don't want to say whether or not AWD is better for racing performance, I will say that if you take a car like the Corvette and give it AWD, you have to remove something to fit it. In this case, you'll be removing the fun. Because there's no room for fun or skill and still keep the weight down after putting in AWD.
Seriously? If you keep putting b!tch controls in and STILL need AWD, you need to buy another car. The Active Handling system on the Corvette is amazing. Even pro drivers benefit from it. But there's really no need for AWD unless you simply do not know how to control your right foot.
Look at the new Ferraris and the Acura NSX (soon to be delivered).
Those are wold class styles IMHO.
#269
Burning Brakes
Can I just say that I find it side-splittingly hysterical that Corvette owners will rag on 911 owners all day for buying a car that keeps trying to make a faulty, antiquated design work (rear engine), but when faced with the limitations of their own design (AWD is better than RWD, no bones about it), they start crying about tradition.
The only reason the Corvette is having any trouble at all showing up any super-car south of half a million dollars is its lack of grip. Read that article about the 2012 Centennial Carbon Z06 vs the 2013 GTR-the TIRES made the difference. Why? Because grip was all the Corvette needed to get the edge on a car it was already better than. If it had AWD, it could forgo having to equip ridiculous semi-slick r-compounds that fall off after 8,000 miles.
The only reason the Corvette is having any trouble at all showing up any super-car south of half a million dollars is its lack of grip. Read that article about the 2012 Centennial Carbon Z06 vs the 2013 GTR-the TIRES made the difference. Why? Because grip was all the Corvette needed to get the edge on a car it was already better than. If it had AWD, it could forgo having to equip ridiculous semi-slick r-compounds that fall off after 8,000 miles.
#270
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Charlotte Area NC
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Okay, I have to give my 2 cents on the C7 renderings and pictures. It is completely disproportionate! Notice the rear of the car compared to the front. It is 'heavy' looking from the bottom of the A pillars back. Looks wise, it does not do it for me. The 'spy pictures' from the side make the front end look like a beak! What is GM thinking at this point? If this looks anything like the real version, I think it will be a flop! I hope these pictures are just a 'fake' to get us all talking and then they will come out with something meaningful. What are the chances of that?
#272
Team Owner
Um, what???
What am I missing here? "GM is ready to compete at the supercar level"???
I seem to recall that the Corvette was ALREADY leading the supercars around by their noses. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the ZR1 putting a hurting on just about every single supercar out there? Didn't Lamborghini have to come up with the Aventador just to keep up with the Jones'? Hmmm... I think that qualifies as competing at supercar levels.
While I don't want to say whether or not AWD is better for racing performance, I will say that if you take a car like the Corvette and give it AWD, you have to remove something to fit it. In this case, you'll be removing the fun. Because there's no room for fun or skill and still keep the weight down after putting in AWD.
Seriously? If you keep putting b!tch controls in and STILL need AWD, you need to buy another car. The Active Handling system on the Corvette is amazing. Even pro drivers benefit from it. But there's really no need for AWD unless you simply do not know how to control your right foot.
What am I missing here? "GM is ready to compete at the supercar level"???
I seem to recall that the Corvette was ALREADY leading the supercars around by their noses. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the ZR1 putting a hurting on just about every single supercar out there? Didn't Lamborghini have to come up with the Aventador just to keep up with the Jones'? Hmmm... I think that qualifies as competing at supercar levels.
While I don't want to say whether or not AWD is better for racing performance, I will say that if you take a car like the Corvette and give it AWD, you have to remove something to fit it. In this case, you'll be removing the fun. Because there's no room for fun or skill and still keep the weight down after putting in AWD.
Seriously? If you keep putting b!tch controls in and STILL need AWD, you need to buy another car. The Active Handling system on the Corvette is amazing. Even pro drivers benefit from it. But there's really no need for AWD unless you simply do not know how to control your right foot.
But when the base Corvette costs as much as a Ferrari 458 then we can start pointing fingers at it's 'lack of competitive style' against other similarly priced (in this case, $250k+) cars.
But right now it costs only $50k give or take.
#273
Team Owner
Oh there are PLENTY of bones about.
With almost every radical change such as that there are upsides and there ARE downsides.
AWD can help acceleration, increase corner exit speeds and grip in wet/cold/icy conditions, that's all true.
But it does also add weight, adds complexity, adds cost, can negativity effect steering 'feel'/input/feedback, can hurt aerodynamics and can drastically alter a vehicles center of gravity and weight distribution, especially one that is so well balanced such as the current Corvette is.
Starting with a ground up/completely blank sheet of paper then yes, GM/Chevrolet/Team Corvette can work around some (not all) of those downsides and come up with a valid Nissan GTR or Porsche 911 Turbo fighter but it is going to COST.
It's NOT the total free lunch that you make it out to be.
Total BS. The Nissan has 'virtual race tires' on it as well. Even it's optional 'all season' style tire is a short life/limited longevity/low mileage tire and during any shootout type of test involving the Nissan, it's always wearing it's even better, super sticky summer tires.
I know your point was more about AWD's advantages and not about tires but I still find it so ironic that when the Corvette used to get beat on a road course (usually it was only by very minute margins anyway mind you) while wearing those old super hard compound Goodyear runflats against some import nameplate vehicle wearing race rubber almost no one (not the magazines nor the general internet public etc.) ever mentioned anything about it.
Now all of a sudden the Corvette Team equips it's top dogs with real tires and all of a suddenly it's some sort of 'unfair advantage'.
Gotta love the blatant irony and BIAS there.
With almost every radical change such as that there are upsides and there ARE downsides.
AWD can help acceleration, increase corner exit speeds and grip in wet/cold/icy conditions, that's all true.
But it does also add weight, adds complexity, adds cost, can negativity effect steering 'feel'/input/feedback, can hurt aerodynamics and can drastically alter a vehicles center of gravity and weight distribution, especially one that is so well balanced such as the current Corvette is.
Starting with a ground up/completely blank sheet of paper then yes, GM/Chevrolet/Team Corvette can work around some (not all) of those downsides and come up with a valid Nissan GTR or Porsche 911 Turbo fighter but it is going to COST.
It's NOT the total free lunch that you make it out to be.
The only reason the Corvette is having any trouble at all showing up any super-car south of half a million dollars is its lack of grip. Read that article about the 2012 Centennial Carbon Z06 vs the 2013 GTR-the TIRES made the difference. Why? Because grip was all the Corvette needed to get the edge on a car it was already better than. If it had AWD, it could forgo having to equip ridiculous semi-slick r-compounds that fall off after 8,000 miles.
I know your point was more about AWD's advantages and not about tires but I still find it so ironic that when the Corvette used to get beat on a road course (usually it was only by very minute margins anyway mind you) while wearing those old super hard compound Goodyear runflats against some import nameplate vehicle wearing race rubber almost no one (not the magazines nor the general internet public etc.) ever mentioned anything about it.
Now all of a sudden the Corvette Team equips it's top dogs with real tires and all of a suddenly it's some sort of 'unfair advantage'.
Gotta love the blatant irony and BIAS there.
#274
Team Owner
Ferrari, Porsche, Mercedes, McLaren etc have all done it (and still do in many cases: 458, GT2 etc).
#275
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: The Lost Borough, NYC
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As with anything there are pros and cons to both RWD and AWD. Yes with higher HP vehicles you will get a better launch almost all the time. RWD requires a higher level of skill and ability. I think if GM decided to use AWD on the vette I am sure they will balance out what needs to be balanced.
#276
Team Owner
But ya can't defy physics, if you take a front engined vehicle with a 52/48 weight distribution that (in these times of ever increasing crash/safety regulations and standards) is already struggling to decrease (or at the very least, maintain) it's 3200 pound curb weight and then add in another differential, drive axles, CV joints, a center transfer case along with all of the accompanying pieces, computers and electronics that go with them, what do ya have?
A far more expensive 3500+ pound sports car with a 55/45 weight distribution.
I want my Corvette to be a Corvette, not a $100k 3800+ pound Nissan.
#277
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
That may (or may not) be true, as styling and appearance is STRICTLY subjective/opinion, not measurable fact.
But when the base Corvette costs as much as a Ferrari 458 then we can start pointing fingers at it's 'lack of competitive style' against other similarly priced (in this case, $250k+) cars.
But right now it costs only $50k give or take.
But when the base Corvette costs as much as a Ferrari 458 then we can start pointing fingers at it's 'lack of competitive style' against other similarly priced (in this case, $250k+) cars.
But right now it costs only $50k give or take.
Yeah, style is subjective. Ferraris are not AWD, but have a great look. Porsches are AWD and (IMHO) don't look great. So as far as opinions go, a Porsche wouldn't be a supercar to me.
Lamborghini makes a gorgeous AWD car. But performance-wise it's still only on-par with the Corvette ZR1 for more than 3x the cost.
As far as performance goes, you simply cannot beat the Corvette, especially for the money. I personally LOVE the looks of the Corvette and it's the first thing that drew me towards the C5s when they first came out. I liked Vettes before the C5, but the C5 was the first time I saw a car that I said "I HAVE TO OWN THAT!"
While Lamborghinis have always looked good to me since the LP400, they've never really made me WANT them so much as a Corvette. And sadly, I've always felt the C4 and C5 interiors were always better than the Countach and Diablo interiors, respectively. Maybe not in materials, but certainly in design and layout.
#278
100%
That may (or may not) be true, as styling and appearance is STRICTLY subjective/opinion, not measurable fact.
But when the base Corvette costs as much as a Ferrari 458 then we can start pointing fingers at it's 'lack of competitive style' against other similarly priced (in this case, $250k+) cars.
But right now it costs only $50k give or take.
That may (or may not) be true, as styling and appearance is STRICTLY subjective/opinion, not measurable fact.
But when the base Corvette costs as much as a Ferrari 458 then we can start pointing fingers at it's 'lack of competitive style' against other similarly priced (in this case, $250k+) cars.
But right now it costs only $50k give or take.
Peace.
#279
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: North Dallas 40 TX
Posts: 6,468
Received 4,383 Likes
on
2,070 Posts
Can I just say that I find it side-splittingly hysterical that Corvette owners will rag on 911 owners all day for buying a car that keeps trying to make a faulty, antiquated design work (rear engine), but when faced with the limitations of their own design (AWD is better than RWD, no bones about it), they start crying about tradition.
The only reason the Corvette is having any trouble at all showing up any super-car south of half a million dollars is its lack of grip. Read that article about the 2012 Centennial Carbon Z06 vs the 2013 GTR-the TIRES made the difference. Why? Because grip was all the Corvette needed to get the edge on a car it was already better than. If it had AWD, it could forgo having to equip ridiculous semi-slick r-compounds that fall off after 8,000 miles.
The only reason the Corvette is having any trouble at all showing up any super-car south of half a million dollars is its lack of grip. Read that article about the 2012 Centennial Carbon Z06 vs the 2013 GTR-the TIRES made the difference. Why? Because grip was all the Corvette needed to get the edge on a car it was already better than. If it had AWD, it could forgo having to equip ridiculous semi-slick r-compounds that fall off after 8,000 miles.
If you understood the frition circle of tires you would know AWD is not optimum for handling. As has already been covered MANY times it adds weight and complexity, increases unsprung weight , rotational mass, and many other handling and performance damaging attributes.
So much for no bones about it. It is not better in all circumstances. And certainly not the ones I care about for a high performance sports car.
#280
Burning Brakes
But it does also add weight, adds complexity, adds cost, can negativity effect steering 'feel'/input/feedback, can hurt aerodynamics and can drastically alter a vehicles center of gravity and weight distribution, especially one that is so well balanced such as the current Corvette is.
If you understood the frition circle of tires you would know AWD is not optimum for handling. As has already been covered MANY times it adds weight and complexity, increases unsprung weight , rotational mass, and many other handling and performance damaging attributes.