C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New c4 info??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2012, 03:12 PM
  #241  
Jinx
Le Mans Master
 
Jinx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2000
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 8,099
Received 398 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Let's hope 2014 isn't 1971 again.
Old 09-07-2012, 03:19 PM
  #242  
JockItch
Safety Car
 
JockItch's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Western Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 4,309
Received 5,336 Likes on 1,988 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jinx
Let's hope 2014 isn't 1971 again.
That's the scary part and part of the reason why I'm very much in favor of them raising the base price by providing a much improved quality and performance car. Sure, it will price certain people out of the market, but that may be needed if you want a significant performance jump and not some bastardized, neutered, fuel economy Corvette.

In this day of looming CAFE regulations, high performance V8's hopefully won't go away, they will just be more expensive and therefor lower volume cars (less of a effect of fleet averages).
Old 09-07-2012, 03:20 PM
  #243  
Paulchristian
Melting Slicks
 
Paulchristian's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,170
Received 174 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5
I understand that Jim, but when people expect the base car to equal or better the horsepower and performance of the outgoing high performance version, they're wrong in my opinion. The outgoing C1(1962) had 360 HP in the high performance version. The incoming C2 has 250 Hp in the base model. The out going C2 had 450+ HP(L88) and the incoming C3 had 300 HP, etc.

In your example, the outgoing high performance C4 had 405 HP(ZR-1), the base C4 had 300 HP, and the incoming C5 had 345 HP, not 405+ HP. Part of the performance inprovement of the C5 over the out going C4 was a reduction in weight of ~70 pounds.


Look at what the performance cost in a C5. A 2002 base coupe had a MSRP of $41,680. The 2002 Z06 had a MSRP of $50,430. $8750 for a 55 HP boost.

I expect there will be a slight horsepower jump in the base C7, but a large part of the performance increase will come from reduction of the car's weight(wouldn't surprize me to see a 150 pound drop). I expect the base C7 will out perform the Base C6 but to out perform a high performance C6 Z06 that costs 50% more then the base C6 isn't practical and shouldn't be expected. GM has to leave something on the table so it can offer a high performance version a couple of years later, to spur sales.

GM's performance numbers for the Z06 is 11.7 seconds for the 1/4 mile, and 11.3 seconds for the ZR1. People on this forum are expecting(wishing !!!!!!) that the base C7 will do 11.5 seconds in the 1/4 mile. I seriously doubt that from the base model.

A crate LS3 cost $6,200, a crate LS7 costs $13,550 and a crate LS9 costs $20,550. That extra 75 HP in the Z06 costs an extra $7350 and that extra 238 HP in the ZR1 cost an extra $14,350. Look at the MSRP of the various models and that extra cost is factored in.

To expect the outgoing C6 with either 505 or 638 Hp in the high performance modesl(Z06 & ZR1) to be the base horsepower of the C7 isn't going to happen or be expected.

Sure, if the additional cost of a high performance base C7 is amortized over the entire production run, the cost will be lower vs over a smaller limited production run, but that will also run up the cost of the base model. People are throwing out numbers like $60,000 for a base C7 that will perform better then the outgoing $80,000 Z06. You should know that increasing the cost of the entry level Corvette by 20% will eliminate a large number of buyers, thus decreasing sales, not increasing them. Then the production costs have to be spread over fewer cars being built/sold, further increasing the car's cost.
My arguement is this:

I tend to believe from the rumors we've heard, that there will only be a base car and one performance model (ZO6 or ZR1).

With a mid-level performer out of the line-up and all GS models out of the line up, isn't it pretty safe to assume that the base car will have to be a competitive performer out of the gate if there will be nothing between it and the one high performance model? I think so... If it doesn't hit the 500hp figure, I think it will be very close.

If a mid level performance model is produced, I take everything I said back. However, I don't think we will see one this time.
Old 09-07-2012, 04:03 PM
  #244  
Jinx
Le Mans Master
 
Jinx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2000
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 8,099
Received 398 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JockItch
That's the scary part and part of the reason why I'm very much in favor of them raising the base price by providing a much improved quality and performance car. Sure, it will price certain people out of the market, but that may be needed if you want a significant performance jump and not some bastardized, neutered, fuel economy Corvette.

In this day of looming CAFE regulations, high performance V8's hopefully won't go away, they will just be more expensive and therefor lower volume cars (less of a effect of fleet averages).
They don't need to make Corvette cost a lot more. They just need to quit putting V8s in cheap Camaros

Seriously, though, it's not an all-or-nothing thing. Remember that base Corvettes provide volume that make the platform viable for higher-performance small-volume versions. I hope we're not there yet, but the day may come when the base Corvette stays flat or even dials back in order to remain viable. Believe it or not there are people for whom a 400hp V8 would be plenty, especially if its competition has had wings clipped. If fuel economy mandates continue to rise, there will be a real and not insignificant price premium for more horsepower, and not every Corvette fan will want to pay full fare. In that scenario, better to keep it reasonable for most than risk losing it all.

Fingers crossed that we're not there for a while yet.
Old 09-07-2012, 04:14 PM
  #245  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,700 Likes on 1,214 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JockItch
That's the scary part and part of the reason why I'm very much in favor of them raising the base price by providing a much improved quality and performance car. Sure, it will price certain people out of the market, but that may be needed if you want a significant performance jump and not some bastardized, neutered, fuel economy Corvette.

In this day of looming CAFE regulations, high performance V8's hopefully won't go away, they will just be more expensive and therefor lower volume cars (less of a effect of fleet averages).
That's just fine and dandy, unless you are the person priced out of the marketplace.
Old 09-07-2012, 04:19 PM
  #246  
X25
Sr.Random input generator
Support Corvetteforum!
 
X25's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 6,789
Received 1,476 Likes on 1,028 Posts

Default

Porsche 911 is quite similar to Corvette in terms of brand history, and its evolution. 911 Carrera has also been steadily getting more HP for the base models, but the HP increase has been much less than what the special performance models got. Base 911 is still around 400HP.

I think it will be pretty much the same story for Corvette. So in my opinion, the base can easily get away with a slight bump in HP, say 450HP or so. I am sure there will be a performance option (similar to Z51) equipped with the third gen magnetic suspension and PTM for those who would like to go to track, and ZR1 could be the one pushing the extremes at a big cost for those who can afford it.
Old 09-07-2012, 04:30 PM
  #247  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,700 Likes on 1,214 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Paulchristian
My arguement is this:

I tend to believe from the rumors we've heard, that there will only be a base car and one performance model (ZO6 or ZR1).

With a mid-level performer out of the line-up and all GS models out of the line up, isn't it pretty safe to assume that the base car will have to be a competitive performer out of the gate if there will be nothing between it and the one high performance model? I think so... If it doesn't hit the 500hp figure, I think it will be very close.

If a mid level performance model is produced, I take everything I said back. However, I don't think we will see one this time.
Getting away from the internet rumors, how about a statement that was given to all the Chevrolet dealers in a printed brochure, that the C7 would not have the Grand Sport, the 427 Convertible, the Z06 or the ZR1 for quite a while. GM left the door open for the possiblity of a high performance C7 model in the future, but pretty much said not to expect one for the first or second year of production.

Based on what GM told the dealers, I wouldn't count on multiple C7 models being available for a while, if ever. Count on the 2014 to be just the base model; a coupe and a convertible. No one outside of GM knows what they are planing for 2015, 2016, 2017, etc. All we know is that there will not be a Grand Sport, a 427 Convertible, a Z06 or a ZR1 in 2014. Now GM might offer an option(but not a model) like the old Z51 RPO, for the high performance fans for 2014. We will just have to wait and see, won't we?

Best we take one year at a time, just as we have for the past 60 years of Corvettes.

Last edited by JoesC5; 09-07-2012 at 04:35 PM.
Old 09-07-2012, 04:53 PM
  #248  
John T
Melting Slicks
 
John T's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: lisbon ,md,usa
Posts: 2,152
Received 267 Likes on 145 Posts

Default

Hey Joe, One year at a time won't cut it in 2014.

Stay with me , I have a good argument :
the guys that will be quicker to trade up are the present day "Z" owners. They have more deposable income.
If the only C7 available for a year is a " mild " version the car, that will slow sales momentum .
Ox is always pushing for better marketing . Great product is the most cost effective way to market this car. The ONLY way to bring this car out of the hole is with a "good" motor, with exciting specs right from the beginning. Do an Eco version later.
Old 09-07-2012, 05:31 PM
  #249  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,700 Likes on 1,214 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by John T
Hey Joe, One year at a time won't cut it in 2014.

Stay with me , I have a good argument :
the guys that will be quicker to trade up are the present day "Z" owners. They have more deposable income.
If the only C7 available for a year is a " mild " version the car, that will slow sales momentum .
Ox is always pushing for better marketing . Great product is the most cost effective way to market this car. The ONLY way to bring this car out of the hole is with a "good" motor, with exciting specs right from the beginning. Do an Eco version later.
When I said take one year at a time, I meant that at the end of the 2014 MY, GM will let us know what the 2015 MY will be. and at the end of the 2015 MY, GM will let us know what the 2016 MY will be, That's the way it's always been, and I see no reason for it to change. Can you imagine what would happen if the auto compaines kept telling us what they were going to offer three, four or five years from now, in detail. Who would ever buy the current year's offering, if we knew what was coming the year after, or the year after that, etc?
Old 09-07-2012, 06:30 PM
  #250  
BlueOx
Race Director
 
BlueOx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,776
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John T
Ox is always pushing for better marketing . Great product is the most cost effective way to market this car. The ONLY way to bring this car out of the hole is with a "good" motor, with exciting specs right from the beginning. Do an Eco version later.
Great product is a given. No amount of marketing will effectively sell a crappy product that your audience doesn't like.

I believe the audience will generally be expecting a close-to-Z06 level performance, but you have to do that while keeping the price point close, like well under $60k. If it doesn't, a lot of people are going to be looking at good used Z06's.
Old 09-07-2012, 06:52 PM
  #251  
Paulchristian
Melting Slicks
 
Paulchristian's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,170
Received 174 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kappa
That's fine, but don't expect C6 Z06 performance out of the base car. Simple as that.

The C6 vs the C5Z was an exception. The C5 wasn't that close to the C4 ZR-1.

If you want the car that traps 125+mph, better to wait for the Z06 than hope for the base car to replicate that type of performance.
The C6 vs the C5Z was an exception? How do you know this? How do you know that it's not a new direction moving forward made possible by better engineering and a competitive environment that all but demands it?
Old 09-07-2012, 06:55 PM
  #252  
BlueOx
Race Director
 
BlueOx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,776
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paulchristian
The C6 vs the C5Z was an exception? How do you know this? How do you know that it's not a new direction moving forward made possible by better engineering and a competitive environment that all but demands it?
More like the new normal.
Old 09-07-2012, 06:58 PM
  #253  
Paulchristian
Melting Slicks
 
Paulchristian's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,170
Received 174 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5
Getting away from the internet rumors, how about a statement that was given to all the Chevrolet dealers in a printed brochure, that the C7 would not have the Grand Sport, the 427 Convertible, the Z06 or the ZR1 for quite a while. GM left the door open for the possiblity of a high performance C7 model in the future, but pretty much said not to expect one for the first or second year of production.

Based on what GM told the dealers, I wouldn't count on multiple C7 models being available for a while, if ever. Count on the 2014 to be just the base model; a coupe and a convertible. No one outside of GM knows what they are planing for 2015, 2016, 2017, etc. All we know is that there will not be a Grand Sport, a 427 Convertible, a Z06 or a ZR1 in 2014. Now GM might offer an option(but not a model) like the old Z51 RPO, for the high performance fans for 2014. We will just have to wait and see, won't we?

Best we take one year at a time, just as we have for the past 60 years of Corvettes.
Fair enough - good point. That said, I think we will be able to read between the lines and determine much better what the future may bring when we know the actual performance numbers of the base C7.
Old 09-07-2012, 07:35 PM
  #254  
racebum
Race Director
 
racebum's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: oregon
Posts: 15,978
Received 153 Likes on 146 Posts

Default

if the msrp of the c7 is around 50 there's no way they would be able to build a car that "easily handles" the c6z for that money.

i quit reading right there
Old 09-07-2012, 07:54 PM
  #255  
Kappa
Melting Slicks
 
Kappa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,826
Received 530 Likes on 234 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by racebum
if the msrp of the c7 is around 50 there's no way they would be able to build a car that "easily handles" the c6z for that money.

i quit reading right there
Exactly.

You'll get a car that does 0-60 in ~3.8-4.0 and runs the quarter in the high 11 bracket at around 120. Skidpad a little over 1g with the good tire option(if there is one), etc, etc.

Hoping for a base C7 that does 125+ in the quarter just doesn't seem realistic to me.

I think it will slot right in between C6 GS and C6 Z06 levels of performance while offering better fuel economy, emissions, lighter weight, and much more advanced features.

Last edited by Kappa; 09-07-2012 at 08:05 PM.
Old 09-07-2012, 08:03 PM
  #256  
Paulchristian
Melting Slicks
 
Paulchristian's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,170
Received 174 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kappa
Exactly.

You'll get a car that does 0-60 in ~3.8-4.0 and runs the quarter in the high 11 bracket at around 120. Skidpad a little over 1g with the good tire option(if there is one), etc, etc.

Hoping for a base C7 that does 125+ in the quarter just doesn't seem realistic to me.

I think it will slot right in between C6 GS and C6 Z06 levels of performance while offering better fuel economy, emissions, lighter weight, and much more advanced features.
which is exactly why I believe the base car will see a price increase - bringing the price closer to $60k, not low $50's. I think to help justify the premium, GM will offer a nice HP bump as well.
Old 09-07-2012, 10:09 PM
  #257  
BluegrassMotorsport
Melting Slicks
 
BluegrassMotorsport's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,290
Received 883 Likes on 478 Posts

Default

When I read that the ZR1 variant was testing as the 'second fastest car in the world,' I literally laughed out loud. I love the Corvette and love to see it succeed. But sub-three-second zero-to-sixty times? The best way to keep from being disappointed when the C7 is finally revealed is to keep your expectations in some realm of reality.

Get notified of new replies

To New c4 info??

Old 09-07-2012, 10:21 PM
  #258  
Paulchristian
Melting Slicks
 
Paulchristian's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,170
Received 174 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by redvette77
When I read that the ZR1 variant was testing as the 'second fastest car in the world,' I literally laughed out loud. I love the Corvette and love to see it succeed. But sub-three-second zero-to-sixty times? The best way to keep from being disappointed when the C7 is finally revealed is to keep your expectations in some realm of reality.
I agree with very little of the OP and am with you regarding the 2nd fastest car in the world comment, but lets not act like a sub three second 0-60 is impossible. Add DCT and you might be there. We won't see these numbers with the base car but who knows what the ZO6/ZR1 will bring to the table...

I won't mention AWD because I don't believe we will see it in the C7.
Old 09-07-2012, 10:23 PM
  #259  
John T
Melting Slicks
 
John T's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: lisbon ,md,usa
Posts: 2,152
Received 267 Likes on 145 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redvette77
When I read that the ZR1 variant was testing as the 'second fastest car in the world,' I literally laughed out loud. I love the Corvette and love to see it succeed. But sub-three-second zero-to-sixty times? The best way to keep from being disappointed when the C7 is finally revealed is to keep your expectations in some realm of reality.
I thought about this comment and I have a lot of experience explaining "fastest" to my 6 year old.

What does fastest mean?

Controlled drag strip?
Nurburgring?
60-90mph ?
Bonneville?

I am not trying to be a smart *** but "fastest" can mean a lot of things
Old 09-07-2012, 10:42 PM
  #260  
Jawnathin
Melting Slicks
 
Jawnathin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,437
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Paulchristian
but lets not act like a sub three second 0-60 is impossible. Add DCT and you might be there.

What difference will a DCT make when 0-60 is all done in first gear?


Quick Reply: New c4 info??



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 PM.