Clutch Hydraulics
with sticky clutch pedal issue all GM 6 speed manual cars suffer from this issue, i hope they just do it right this time
can't imagine this would be expensive to upgrade. But, nine C6 model yrs later and it's still not fixed...





The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Went through three master cylinders on mine. Never heard of the Tick, can you tell me more?Problems occur at quick shifts near red line. I think those not having problems either don't rev that high or shift pretty slow.
That said, GM stated that there are only 2 parts carried over from the C6 and the clutch hydraulics were not one of them. So to answer your question, NO, they are not using the C6 hydraulic system on the C7!
That said, GM stated that there are only 2 parts carried over from the C6 and the clutch hydraulics were not one of them. So to answer your question, NO, they are not using the C6 hydraulic system on the C7!
That said, GM stated that there are only 2 parts carried over from the C6 and the clutch hydraulics were not one of them. So to answer your question, NO, they are not using the C6 hydraulic system on the C7!
That said, GM stated that there are only 2 parts carried over from the C6 and the clutch hydraulics were not one of them. So to answer your question, NO, they are not using the C6 hydraulic system on the C7!
IMO it is a very reasonable question to see if they have improved things on the C7. Pretty annoying when you grab 2nd aggressively and then the clutch pedal sticks to the floor so you're stuck until you pull the pedal up with your foot and wait for the hydraulics to function again.
The 2 carry over parts bit is interesting, though. They said cabin air filter and the rear targa latches. They also said the LT1 only had a few carry over parts, starter bolts and other fasteners iirc. So since the LT1 will be in the C7, it seems like the drivetrain was not being considered in the initial statement.
As someone else said, they can technically make only minor changes to a part and assign a new PN, and it is a "new" part.
I don't really have a problem with that claim though, because the changes they've made are likely to effect interchangeability, so it really is new. You couldn't substitute the C6 version. Considering the main loads and constraints are all similar (front engine, rear transmission, rwd), it's not really bad to have the parts be an improved version of a proven design, IMO.















