Corvette Engineers are a Joke
#1
Corvette Engineers are a Joke
Corvette engineers really are stupid. They must not have realized that the average IQ of a Corvette owner is 50. They obviously wasted too much time and resources on things like body structure, steering, chassis tuning, suspension, interior quality, weight distribution, seats, and electronic gizmos when EVERYONE knows that the true merit of a car can only be measured ONLY by hp. If all that matters in a sports car is the horsepower, why did they waste hundreds of millions (if not billions) of dollars on the development of features that have nothing to do with what merits a sports car and that's horsepower? Who the freak cares how fast it can lap the Nurburgring, Laguna Seca, or VIR? All sports cars are suppose to do is drag race. If they really wanted to advance the Corvette, they should have taken the body of a C3 or C4, thrown in a small block V8 with twin turbochargers and gotten 1000 hp out of it. If they had done that, most Corvette fans would not have p_ssed on the C7 in hundreds of threads. It's Corvette Engineers fault for being so stupid.
Last edited by OHV4LIFE; 05-26-2013 at 11:42 AM.
#2
Pardon my English but I believe you are the one who is stupid. We all heard from the beginning that the C7 would have at least 450 hp. That is what they delivered and that is where GM will get the most bang for their buck. Go ahead and sit on the sidelines grousing about what could have been while GM sells out the C7. Your not participating will provide an opportunity for another person to order a C7.
#3
Team Owner
hmmm.....should I close this one now before it goes really bad or.....
#4
Pardon my English but I believe you are the one who is stupid. We all heard from the beginning that the C7 would have at least 450 hp. That is what they delivered and that is where GM will get the most bang for their buck. Go ahead and sit on the sidelines grousing about what could have been while GM sells out the C7. Your not participating will provide an opportunity for another person to order a C7.
#5
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,657
Received 4,116 Likes
on
1,470 Posts
2020 C8 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
#6
Melting Slicks
Have you heard of tongue in cheek humor?
A good one! A breath of fresh air in this otherwise depressing forum. He makes a great point (in an odd joking way...) that I personally agree with.
A good one! A breath of fresh air in this otherwise depressing forum. He makes a great point (in an odd joking way...) that I personally agree with.
Last edited by RussM05; 05-26-2013 at 12:02 PM.
#7
I appreciate his sarcasm and agree. Unfortunately focusing upon one simple statistic goes far beyond just the "Corvette issue" and is symptomatic of people looking for simple descriptions and answers to complex situations and issues.
On a lighter note, here is a good resource to a long list of "non-sports car" Corvettes since all apparently are light on horsepower and those zero to 60 times are really embarrassing
Seriously it is sort of fun to take a stroll down memory lane of Corvette brochures of the past and keep in mind that HP rating methods changed so the earlier HP ratings would be far less in the more realistic modern era:
http://www.oldcarbrochures.com/stati.../dirindex.html
On a lighter note, here is a good resource to a long list of "non-sports car" Corvettes since all apparently are light on horsepower and those zero to 60 times are really embarrassing
Seriously it is sort of fun to take a stroll down memory lane of Corvette brochures of the past and keep in mind that HP rating methods changed so the earlier HP ratings would be far less in the more realistic modern era:
http://www.oldcarbrochures.com/stati.../dirindex.html
#8
Intermediate
Member Since: May 2013
Location: Englewood Cliffs New Jersey
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Enough already!!!
The numbers are:
465 HP
448-450 TQ
This was covered in the SAE graph publication earlier this month. End of discussion.
Thanks.
The numbers are:
465 HP
448-450 TQ
This was covered in the SAE graph publication earlier this month. End of discussion.
Thanks.
#9
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Mechanicsburg Pennsylvania
Posts: 5,535
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
11 Posts
A little smiley face icon at the end of the OP's post would have assured his rant is tongue in cheek humor - which I am taking for granted it is.
I do feel good that my IQ is above 50, so I'm above average
I do feel good that my IQ is above 50, so I'm above average
#13
Le Mans Master
It really wasnt obvious...lol...several people WILL post some sh*t on here saying that basic message. Many here dont care about true performance it seems...they care about hp number they can tell their friends at the local sunday doo wop meet, where everyone who builds their old musclecar says it has 500hp, or 600hp, yet doesnt have the first dyno sheet to prove it.
#14
Racer
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: American in Germany 1 Hour to the ring fast
Posts: 476
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes but I think you're being to Kind
If they saved went to a solid real axle, they might compete with the Mustang, a Rear engine and they could out-do the 911
Corvette engineers really are stupid. They must not have realized that the average IQ of a Corvette owner is 50. They obviously wasted too much time and resources on things like body structure, steering, chassis tuning, suspension, interior quality, weight distribution, seats, and electronic gizmos when EVERYONE knows that the true merit of a car can only be measured ONLY by hp. If all that matters in a sports car is the horsepower, why did they waste hundreds of millions (if not billions) of dollars on the development of features that have nothing to do with what merits a sports car and that's horsepower? Who the freak cares how fast it can lap the Nurburgring, Laguna Seca, or VIR? All sports cars are suppose to do is drag race. If they really wanted to advance the Corvette, they should have taken the body of a C3 or C4, thrown in a small block V8 with twin turbochargers and gotten 1000 hp out of it. If they had done that, most Corvette fans would not have p_ssed on the C7 in hundreds of threads. It's Corvette Engineers fault for being so stupid.
#15
Race Director
Corvette engineers really are stupid. They must not have realized that the average IQ of a Corvette owner is 50. They obviously wasted too much time and resources on things like body structure, steering, chassis tuning, suspension, interior quality, weight distribution, seats, and electronic gizmos when EVERYONE knows that the true merit of a car can only be measured ONLY by hp. If all that matters in a sports car is the horsepower, why did they waste hundreds of millions (if not billions) of dollars on the development of features that have nothing to do with what merits a sports car and that's horsepower? Who the freak cares how fast it can lap the Nurburgring, Laguna Seca, or VIR? All sports cars are suppose to do is drag race. If they really wanted to advance the Corvette, they should have taken the body of a C3 or C4, thrown in a small block V8 with twin turbochargers and gotten 1000 hp out of it. If they had done that, most Corvette fans would not have p_ssed on the C7 in hundreds of threads. It's Corvette Engineers fault for being so stupid.
#16
Pardon my English but I believe you are the one who is stupid. We all heard from the beginning that the C7 would have at least 450 hp. That is what they delivered and that is where GM will get the most bang for their buck. Go ahead and sit on the sidelines grousing about what could have been while GM sells out the C7. Your not participating will provide an opportunity for another person to order a C7.
#18
Melting Slicks
#20
Safety Car