When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Well there we have it - the regular Z06 runs 3 sec faster than the new C7 Z51. Break out the popcorn and wait for the tears...
This was a surprise to anyone? The Z06 had more power, more rubber, and started at 75k. The C7 Z51 isn't meant to beat a C6Z06. It'd have been nice to have advanced that far, but really, nobody was expecting the world for nothing.
This was a surprise to anyone? The Z06 had more power, more rubber, and started at 75k. The C7 Z51 isn't meant to beat a C6Z06. It'd have been nice to have advanced that far, but really, nobody was expecting the world for nothing.
And in the link you provided Snorman, it shows the Fastest Lap of VIR in a Z06, a Z07 variant, at 2:53.50 - which is what I understood to be the fastest.
So I'm still stymied as to where the 2:49 lap of VIR in a Z06 is coming from?
Michelin Pilot Super Sport ZP
Put those tires on a c6 or c5 vette to see an honest comparison.
Really i think its the other way round with the c7's skinny tires. Put the z06 tires.....thats if it'll fit in the wheel wells of the c7 and run that lap again and see just how close it'll get to alleged z06 time
And in the link you provided Snorman, it shows the Fastest Lap of VIR in a Z06, a Z07 variant, at 2:53.50 - which is what I understood to be the fastest.
So I'm still stymied as to where the 2:49 lap of VIR in a Z06 is coming from?
Yes, I know.
Even The Bash video references a Z06 on "Goodyear Gen 2" tires running a 2:50.
I guess it's "Seize on a Typo and Run With It Day"?
S.
I guess at this point, you've suggested the most logical conclusion. A lap time 'typo'.
I wonder what tires the 'typos' run on
According to the video from The Bash, a ZR1 with PS2's went 2:48 and on Pilot Sport Cups one went 2:45.
But you know, this is the same bullsh*t being spread around about the C7's braking performance, where Motor Trend results are being compared to what GM has released. http://forums.corvetteforum.com/1584398273-post292.html
S.
Does the audio system have to be turned on for the Noise Cancelling System to work? I assume it will.
That's usually a background function, like bluetooth, so probably not...
Originally Posted by Rad22
Stop arguing and enjoy the pictures. Sheesh.
Me likey...
What's disappointing about this photo is how badly the car's nose is lifting...and it's not even getting any traction! I was hoping that GM had finally figured out anti-dive/anti-squat suspension geometry for this car. I've always been embarrassed by the way all of my Corvettes have taken on that "dog-squatting-to-pee" attitude whenever I've nailed the throttle...even at speed. Not only will a cop be able to spot this from a long way off...it has to wreak havoc with suspension geometry, aerodynamics, etc. Why is it so difficult for the car to retain attitude when accelerating? This is my first major let-down with the C7's dynamic characteristics. I am morose...
Last edited by 1analguy; Jul 18, 2013 at 03:55 AM.
Yes, I know.
Even The Bash video references a Z06 on "Goodyear Gen 2" tires running a 2:50.
I guess it's "Seize on a Typo and Run With It Day"?
S.
You must remember that Mero also said that the Z06 ran 1 second faster when equipped with the C7 tires. I think that was mentioned earlier in the same Bash video, when he was talking about tire development.
Hence, 2:50 minus 1 second = 2:49.
Pretty simple. No conspiracy or typo. This info was discussed way back when the C7 VIR laptime was revealed as well. Myself and a couple others were trying to determine comparable times using the Bash video and estimates of the tire performance variation. At the time we thought the C7 would be about 2.8 seconds slower than a Z06 and 1.8 seconds faster than a GS (if the GS were equipped with the C7 tires).
What's disappointing about this photo is how badly the car's nose is lifting...and it's not even getting any traction! I was hoping that GM had finally figured out anti-dive/anti-squat suspension geometry for this car. I've always been embarrassed by the way all of my Corvettes have taken on that "dog-squatting-to-pee" attitude whenever I've nailed the throttle...even at speed. Not only will a cop be able to spot this from a long way off...it has to wreak havoc with suspension geometry, aerodynamics, etc. Why is it so difficult for the car to retain attitude when accelerating? This is my first major let-down with the C7's dynamic characteristics. I am morose...
It's not geometry, it's shock damping. If you added more rebound to the front, it wouldn't come up nearly as much. However, this also aids traction. The C6 MSRC was programmed to do this when you used Launch Control. The front shocks would go completely soft to let the nose lift and then at the top of travel, stiffen to keep as much weight on the rear tires after the hit.
And aerodynamics are irrelevant to the conversation under 60mph. At 60mph, your car will not still be squatting like this, even at WOT.
That's usually a background function, like bluetooth, so probably not...
What's disappointing about this photo is how badly the car's nose is lifting...and it's not even getting any traction! I was hoping that GM had finally figured out anti-dive/anti-squat suspension geometry for this car. I've always been embarrassed by the way all of my Corvettes have taken on that "dog-squatting-to-pee" attitude whenever I've nailed the throttle...even at speed. Not only will a cop be able to spot this from a long way off...it has to wreak havoc with suspension geometry, aerodynamics, etc. Why is it so difficult for the car to retain attitude when accelerating? This is my first major let-down with the C7's dynamic characteristics. I am morose...
If you are concerned with it, just get wheelie bars like the pro dragsters use
You must remember that Mero also said that the Z06 ran 1 second faster when equipped with the C7 tires. I think that was mentioned earlier in the same Bash video, when he was talking about tire development.
Hence, 2:50 minus 1 second = 2:49.
Pretty simple. No conspiracy or typo. This info was discussed way back when the C7 VIR laptime was revealed as well. Myself and a couple others were trying to determine comparable times using the Bash video and estimates of the tire performance variation. At the time we thought the C7 would be about 2.8 seconds slower than a Z06 and 1.8 seconds faster than a GS (if the GS were equipped with the C7 tires).