When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My DD is a 09 C6 w/Z51, love it. 75 mile round trip commute daily plus I drive it all weekend too
The C7 Stingray w/Z51 should be fine as far as ride quality.
You got the NPP
Sounds like you got the car you wanted.
I hope its the best color: Velocity Yellowwhich is also the easiest to keep clean.
It all depends what you want to do with it, and you stated you will not race it. To be honest if you are no going to exercise the car, why get Z51? Maybe resale value or bigger tires?
As far as mag ride...... when its on track you dont want to drive on the street. If you not racing or maybe you not driving in the snow.......why would you need this?
And on my 13 GS with bigger tires and Z51....... It rides better then my C5 with $400 Michelin tires...... so no the Z51 is NOT harsh!!!!
Now if this is your dream car......maybe go ahead with it. But if you intend to keep it 20 years better factor in replacing the mag shocks.......... you'll be shocked at the price.
this is the truth the man speaks. Im not going to get the z51 package myself, I will never track my car, and I use it as a DD with an average 20k miles a year. I don't want to replace tires that often as the z51 is riding on some beef jerky strips that just cant last. I had the mag ride on my C6, I enjoyed it, until one of the shocks started to leak a little and I started inquiring about repair/replacement costs
I like the z51 wheels and spoilers, but as said, plenty of options out there. Since its not an option for me, I haven't given the mag ride option a lot of thought. I'd probably get it again as I enjoyed the ride, and just set $100 a month aside like a tuition fund for the eventual replacement cost. One could argue the same if I bought the z51 and was burning through tires, but I have to draw a line somewhere
I don't have it on my GS, & didn't order it on my Z51. I have never driven or rode in a C6 with it so obviously can't compare the ride. That being said, I'm of retirement age and live in Illinois where we are known for corrupt government, not smooth roads, and I drive mine regularly. The ride has never been an issue for me.
We too are AARP folks and live in Illinois. We bought our 2009 Z51 without MSR because that combination wasn't available. This is our third Z51 Corvette, but after a couple of years I replaced the Z51 shocks with base model shocks. 15,000 miles per year on those Z51 shocks was just too annoying for us.
This is guesswork until somebody does a back-to-back road test of Z51 C7s with and without magnetic shocks. If they're _close_ when driving in the various sport modes, I'd spare myself the complexity and order the passive suspension.
This is guesswork until somebody does a back-to-back road test of Z51 C7s with and without magnetic shocks. If they're _close_ when driving in the various sport modes, I'd spare myself the complexity and order the passive suspension.
Since everyone is giving opinions (and no one has driven the two cars, base and Z51-MSRC)....I'd agree w. the above. And that to me is the key: no one has done a back-to-back comparison, not even writers who double as car magazine drivers.
However, I've been told that this is a more advanced MSRC than in prior generations. I don't doubt it since "adjustable shocks" mechanical or computer/electrical have been around for quite a few years, even on Corvettes. Therefore, it may very well be excellent and highly recommended. But, at this point, who really knows?
I'm not sure I'd get it. Only on the worst of roads do I think the Z51 suspension on my car is harsh. And I mean really bad roads which would make you think you need an alignment after you get past it.
It may be a good thing to have, and probably won't hurt resale values if you ever go to sell the car. But as far as a must-have, I don't agree especially if it's a budget-buster.
The new shocks are "dual coil" in that they have two electromagnetic coils instead of one. This widens the performance envelope and increases response times even further. In layman's terms the track mode is "trackier" and the touring mode is more compliant than ever. Reading everything about the car and listening to the engineering seminars from the bash, it appears the MSRC is more about making the Z51 softer and more capable as a tourer vs. making it that much more capable on track. Jim Mero basically said if you're getting Z51 you ened to get MSRC as it makes the car. They say the Z51 with MSRC in touring mode is the best riding configuration available, better than the base car. So if it's going to be a DD get the base car or spend the money to get the MSRC with the Z51.
I'm not sure I'd get it. Only on the worst of roads do I think the Z51 suspension on my car is harsh. And I mean really bad roads which would make you think you need an alignment after you get past it.
I wouldn't be interested in magnetic ride for a smoother ride on bumpy roads (the old Z51 ride was fine), but I would consider it if it made a dramatic handling difference.
I wouldn't be interested in magnetic ride for a smoother ride on bumpy roads (the old Z51 ride was fine), but I would consider it if it made a dramatic handling difference.
Not being picky but a handling difference can take on a couple of meanings, at least to me. Forget ride comfort for a moment and just think that a road is so relatively bumpy that the handling deteriorates. It does happen and that can cause a feeling of "discomfort," different from ride comfort. And then there is ride comfort, too, which is a separate issue altogether and more one of "perception" or "individual feel."
But I do understand what you mean by handling difference which is that the car actually handles better under most situations than a car without the added MSRC.
Mag ride is a great suspension, please understand that it is NOT a comfort suspension, however. In a C6, Mag ride (F55 back then) calms the mid corner bump nervousness that plagues C6's.
I understand that FE4 will available on the base suspension C7 in 2015.
I couldn't tell any difference in the C6 models, but if you don't like the sports car type of ride, I don't understand why a person would want to buy a a high-performance car like this and then pay all that extra money to allegedly get a softer ride.??
My 2006 Z51 Coupe is a daily driver as well. It is the smoothest riding sports car I've ever owned even without MSRC. I test drove a non Z51 coupe in 2005 and it was way too cushy for my taste. I love to drive and want to feel the road . I suspect the C7 Z51 w/o MSRC will be fine but if you like a softer ride while maintaining grip MSRC would be the way to go. MSRC probably does improve lap times if you race the car and would improve lap times for those who track the car (tracking and racing being very different) and want the comfort of knowing the computer will further reduce the chances of losing it in the turns.
Do keep in mind a Z51 shock costs about $110 each and the current MSRC shocks are about $1040 each for fronts and $850 each for the rears. The new gen MSRC shocks will probably be more. For those who don't drive the cars that much (I've never understood this, reread sentence four) replacement cost is not an issue. If it's a DD repair cost may be a consideration.
Last edited by 66dreams; Jul 26, 2013 at 02:23 PM.
I couldn't tell any difference in the C6 models, but if you don't like the sports car type of ride, I don't understand why a person would want to buy a a high-performance car like this and then pay all that extra money to allegedly get a softer ride.??
Again, FE4/F55 is NOT a comfort suspension. The mag ride shocks tame the jittery behavior when mid corner bumps are encountered that plague the C6. But if someone is expecting to put the shocks in "Tour" mode and have a Cadillac ride, that does NOT happen. Firmness is function of spring rate much more so than shock damping. The best ride offered in the C6 (and I assume the C7) will be the base setup, because of softer springs.
Thanks everyone for their responses. I just drove a friend's '05 Z51 convert without MSR and didn't think it was too harsh - I think it will be safe to assume that the C7 won't be any stiffer.
I'll stick with my original plan of Z51 without MSR - I like the upgraded brakes and other technical upgrades, but it doesn't sound like the MSR will make much of a difference to someone who doesn't plan to race the car. I do plan to keep the car for a long time, so the replacement cost of the mag shocks is an excellent point. Thanks again!
I couldn't tell any difference in the C6 models, but if you don't like the sports car type of ride, I don't understand why a person would want to buy a a high-performance car like this and then pay all that extra money to allegedly get a softer ride.??
Why pay for heated seats if you drive in winter?
Why pay for a good sound system?
Etc.
If you only use the car for track time, or as a weekend toy; who needs that stuff. But we drive 15k-20k miles per year, all over the U.S., and on some pretty nasty roads. For us, the MSR would make sense.
The new shocks are "dual coil" in that they have two electromagnetic coils instead of one. This widens the performance envelope and increases response times even further. In layman's terms the track mode is "trackier" and the touring mode is more compliant than ever. Reading everything about the car and listening to the engineering seminars from the bash, it appears the MSRC is more about making the Z51 softer and more capable as a tourer vs. making it that much more capable on track. Jim Mero basically said if you're getting Z51 you ened to get MSRC as it makes the car. They say the Z51 with MSRC in touring mode is the best riding configuration available, better than the base car. So if it's going to be a DD get the base car or spend the money to get the MSRC with the Z51.
All good thoughts, I completely agree & and I will not order my C7 without it. As to the great rationalizers, no amount of info like you've mentioned, will sway their need to save a few bucks and convince themselves they are better off without it. We'll enjoy the huge benefits of the MRSC & they'll enjoy bouncing all over the countryside on all but mainly smooth roads. A win/win for everyone.
Was useless for me on the C6, and was swapped out within a few thousand miles for Pfadts. The C7 will be no different. The one that ends up in my driveway will immediately go on a set of coilovers and proper sway bars.
For me, a tightly sprung car is ride quality. I prefer the feedback, and don't require plush motoring. I'd buy a Cadillac otherwise.
The C7 will be no different. The one that ends up in my driveway will immediately go on a set of coilovers...
Might want to take a close look at the Edmunds suspension article. The new frame has completely redesigned upper shock mounts. There is no more beefy upper mount. The top of the shock is bolted with the botls in shear. I'm not so sure you'll be able to ditch the leafs w/o some welding.
There's no need for bulky reinforced towers up high when the spring sits down low, and the shock loads are directed right into the side of the frame itself.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.