Torn Between 1LT and 2LT...Dating Technology
I love the idea of having the HUD and yes even the heated AND cooled seats.
But does anyone else feel it is excessive?
As a follow on question to this...does anyone fear how this technology will look dated in just 5-7 years? IMO, it's one thing for the styling of a car to look older, but it's another for all the infotainment and technological features to look dated. This is one reason why I would never spring the money for a Navigation system. The HUD and Nav systems on the C6 already look dated.
Sometimes I feel if you go simple, like the simple analog gauges and technology seen in earlier Corvettes, Porsches, or just cars in general, they have a simplistic beauty to them that is unmatched and never seem to have the "old look." Or, do these techno gizmos just add to the charm of the vehicle as the car ages, reflections of the era they were made? The bar graph speedometer look of the early C4 models for instance, yes, some may laugh, but to some they appear unique.
I love the idea of having the HUD and yes even the heated AND cooled seats.
But does anyone else feel it is excessive?
As a follow on question to this...does anyone fear how this technology will look dated in just 5-7 years? IMO, it's one thing for the styling of a car to look older, but it's another for all the infotainment and technological features to look dated. This is one reason why I would never spring the money for a Navigation system. The HUD and Nav systems on the C6 already look dated.
Sometimes I feel if you go simple, like the simple analog gauges and technology seen in earlier Corvettes, Porsches, or just cars in general, they have a simplistic beauty to them that is unmatched and never seem to have the "old look." Or, do these techno gizmos just add to the charm of the vehicle as the car ages, reflections of the era they were made? The bar graph speedometer look of the early C4 models for instance, yes, some may laugh, but to some they appear unique.
A good example is GMs digital displays of the early 90s, horrible contrast and refresh rates just didn't accomplish a gauges primary purpose.
Also, as someone who has a now-nearly-seven-year-old nav system in his current car, I can say with confidence that there is nothing about the system looking "dated" or "old" that ever bothers me.
Last edited by RocketGuy3; Aug 6, 2013 at 04:00 PM.
Also, as someone who has a now-nearly-seven-year-old nav system in his current car, I can say with confidence that there is nothing about the system looking "dated" or "old" that ever bothers me.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
My response to the other question is, I guess more largely, how well do you think Corvettes age? I've owned my share and have kept them up well. I've gotten glances of my older cars going down the road even though they are older models. I'd think you'd be silly to say that you are not at least partially buying this car for the lines it offers and styling.
Where do you think the Corvettes (the C6 or C7) will be in 40 or 50 years? Will they be appreciated and admired like the C2 or C3s, old Porsche 356s or 911s at your local car show? Or has that era of cars come and gone? Will everything look dated from this 2000 millenia and nothing will be able to touch or come close to that classic 1960s era? Perhaps it's all in the "eye of the beholder" and I'm just biased.
I'll admit, cars from the 1960s have grown on me more as I've gotten older. I'd rather stare at a Porsche 356B coupe or Speedster than a new 911 Turbo.
I love the idea of having the HUD and yes even the heated AND cooled seats.
But does anyone else feel it is excessive?
As a follow on question to this...does anyone fear how this technology will look dated in just 5-7 years? IMO, it's one thing for the styling of a car to look older, but it's another for all the infotainment and technological features to look dated. This is one reason why I would never spring the money for a Navigation system. The HUD and Nav systems on the C6 already look dated.
Sometimes I feel if you go simple, like the simple analog gauges and technology seen in earlier Corvettes, Porsches, or just cars in general, they have a simplistic beauty to them that is unmatched and never seem to have the "old look." Or, do these techno gizmos just add to the charm of the vehicle as the car ages, reflections of the era they were made? The bar graph speedometer look of the early C4 models for instance, yes, some may laugh, but to some they appear unique.



While the 1LT car is nicely equipped and will be fine for many, I chose the 2LT. My use for this car will be 90% cruising, touring, vacationing and 10% performance driving, tracking.
Looking at the 2LT the addition of the added color features in the interior, the lumbar and bolster adjustment, heated /cooled seats, auto dimming mirror, memory package, and the luggage shade and net were worth the price of admission for me.
I'm not so sure that your reasoning and thoughts about dated technology work with the Stingray honestly. At least with respect to 1LT vs. 2LT. If you don't want the HUD, turn it off. Regarding the rest of the technology, you get it with all equipment groups including the MyLink, dual touch screens and digital instrument panel. If you are worried about technology this car has it without regard for the trim level.
I used and enjoyed the HUD and the touch screen navigation system in my C6 up until the day the car drove away with it's new owner. Never bothered me in the least. With regard to future owners, odds are they are coming from a different vehicle platform or older generation of Corvette and whatever you have may just be new to them.
The system in the Corvette is much more configurable and open source which will allow for future upgrade and as long as the trend favors this technology has less chance of obsolesence.



Insofar as the other goodies in the 2LT option package.....I can live without the extra features. I think the 2LT option package is not worth the money. Upon resale, you rarely get any of the extra cost back.
So, IMO, save your $$$, and get a base 1LT. I think the base 1LT is one heck of a deal with lots of standard features.
Having said this about saving $$$, I ordered the new NAV system. It is a real bargain and enhances the technology of the car for less than $800.
My response to the other question is, I guess more largely, how well do you think Corvettes age? I've owned my share and have kept them up well. I've gotten glances of my older cars going down the road even though they are older models. I'd think you'd be silly to say that you are not at least partially buying this car for the lines it offers and styling.
Where do you think the Corvettes (the C6 or C7) will be in 40 or 50 years? Will they be appreciated and admired .
I know where I'll be in 40 or 50 years!
Six feet under
I love the idea of having the HUD and yes even the heated AND cooled seats.
But does anyone else feel it is excessive?
As a follow on question to this...does anyone fear how this technology will look dated in just 5-7 years? IMO, it's one thing for the styling of a car to look older, but it's another for all the infotainment and technological features to look dated. This is one reason why I would never spring the money for a Navigation system. The HUD and Nav systems on the C6 already look dated.
Sometimes I feel if you go simple, like the simple analog gauges and technology seen in earlier Corvettes, Porsches, or just cars in general, they have a simplistic beauty to them that is unmatched and never seem to have the "old look." Or, do these techno gizmos just add to the charm of the vehicle as the car ages, reflections of the era they were made? The bar graph speedometer look of the early C4 models for instance, yes, some may laugh, but to some they appear unique.
I love the idea of having the HUD and yes even the heated AND cooled seats.
But does anyone else feel it is excessive?
As a follow on question to this...does anyone fear how this technology will look dated in just 5-7 years? IMO, it's one thing for the styling of a car to look older, but it's another for all the infotainment and technological features to look dated. This is one reason why I would never spring the money for a Navigation system. The HUD and Nav systems on the C6 already look dated.
Sometimes I feel if you go simple, like the simple analog gauges and technology seen in earlier Corvettes, Porsches, or just cars in general, they have a simplistic beauty to them that is unmatched and never seem to have the "old look." Or, do these techno gizmos just add to the charm of the vehicle as the car ages, reflections of the era they were made? The bar graph speedometer look of the early C4 models for instance, yes, some may laugh, but to some they appear unique.
Okay, really? Worried about things getting dated in 5-7 years?
Just buy the damn car and enjoy it.























