When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I scaled and overlayed my 2009 C6 LS3 dyno graph that was done at Superchips over the C7 one shown today by Lingenfelter. My car was stock with the NPP at the time of the dyno run using 93 octane.
Dyno comparisons across vehicles are never scientific but it's a rough idea for comparison.
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (performance mods)
C4 of Year Winner (performance mods) 2019
Originally Posted by Shurshot
Better to show broken lines versus subtle color differences when doing an overlay ......... just saying
Yeah I realized after I did it. That one's easy though, the C6 is the lower of the two. I also did one vs my C6 with just Z06 exhaust manifolds & H-pipe (stock tune & filter):
I did the C6 in red, but it's still not the easiest to make out. The upper end is very similar, but the C7 has a big TQ/HP bump down low.
very nice comparison ...now I would like to see the Lingenfelter LS3 525 package dyno sheet on their site versus the C7...and the 525 package does not use an upgraded exhaust manifold such as the LS7/ZR1 or new C7.
The C7 power increase over the C6 is minimal. Although the weight increase in the C7 is substantial when compared to a base C6. I am a corvette lover and I really like the C7, but the power could have been better.
Yeah I realized after I did it. That one's easy though, the C6 is the lower of the two. I also did one vs my C6 with just Z06 exhaust manifolds & H-pipe (stock tune & filter):
I did the C6 in red, but it's still not the easiest to make out. The upper end is very similar, but the C7 has a big TQ/HP bump down low.
You are comparing STD correction to SAE correction. This is not a valid comaprison. STD correction is always going to give you much higher numbers than SAE. You peak stock 401 hp STD = 382 hp SAE and your modded 414 hp STD = 395 hp SAE. You would see a much bigger difference in the graphs if you were comaparing apples to apples.
I would recommend taking your charts down since they will just confuse people.
You are comparing STD correction to SAE correction. This is not a valid comaprison.
I would recommend taking your charts down since they will just confuse people.
Especially since the graph is displayed in MPH instead of RPM.
You are comparing STD correction to SAE correction. This is not a valid comaprison. STD correction is always going to give you much higher numbers than SAE. You peak stock 401 hp STD = 382 hp SAE and your modded 414 hp STD = 395 hp SAE. You would see a much bigger difference in the graphs if you were comaparing apples to apples.
I would recommend taking your charts down since they will just confuse people.
Good catch.
I 'thought' the difference when corrected to STD was about 2.6%, but either way, the LS3 is not making close to the same power as the LT1 stock vs. stock. Lingenfelter posted overlays of an LT1, LS3 and LS7 here... http://forums.corvetteforum.com/1584989050-post54.html
Scaled the same, same smoothing, all SAE.
S.
Good catch.
I 'thought' the difference when corrected to STD was about 2.6%, but either way, the LS3 is not making close to the same power as the LT1 stock vs. stock. Lingenfelter posted overlays of an LT1, LS3 and LS7 here... http://forums.corvetteforum.com/1584989050-post54.html
Scaled the same, same smoothing, all SAE.
S.
Wow... that makes the LT1 look even stronger relative to the LS3 and effectively the same as the LS7 to 5,000 RPM
Good catch.
I 'thought' the difference when corrected to STD was about 2.6%, but either way, the LS3 is not making close to the same power as the LT1 stock vs. stock. Scaled the same, same smoothing, all SAE.
S.
The LT1 makes 29 horses more than the LS3, or 6% more power at these HP levels. That's not much. The torque here is the big story, and that is up by a lot.
Leveling to SAE won't make a ton of difference here. The numbers on the first graph are right where they should be for the respective engines. Peak power of 388 for the LS3 and 416 for the LT1.
The LT1 makes 29 horses more than the LS3, or 6% more power at these HP levels. That's not much. The torque here is the big story, and that is up by a lot.
IMO 29 rwhp is substantial base car vs. base car and should translate to 3-4 mph trap speed differences. Agree...huge torque increase.
Originally Posted by TTRotary
Leveling to SAE won't make a ton of difference here. The numbers on the first graph are right where they should be for the respective engines. Peak power of 388 for the LS3 and 416 for the LT1.
Correct...the first posted graph was SAE vs. SAE, the 2nd and 3rd were SAE vs. STD.
S.
The LT1 makes 29 horses more than the LS3, or 6% more power at these HP levels. That's not much. The torque here is the big story, and that is up by a lot.
LS7 > LT1 by 36.6HP at peak
LT1 > LS3 by 31.1HP at peak
But you are right... if you look at the torque increase of the LT1 across the RPM range and the extra area under the HP curve vs. the LS3, the differences are meaningful... very meaningful. What impresses me most is the LS7 and LT1 graphs to 5,000RPM... effectively identical. After 5,000RPM, the LS7 walks away (and it weighs less) but until then, the LT1 is impressive!!
LS7 > LT1 by 36.6HP at peak
LT1 > LS3 by 31.1HP at peak
But you are right... if you look at the torque increase of the LT1 across the RPM range and the extra area under the HP curve vs. the LS3, the differences are meaningful... very meaningful. What impresses me most is the LS7 and LT1 graphs to 5,000RPM... effectively identical.
Is there any doubt that C7's run in decent air at a well prepped track will be trapping well over 120 mph? I am guessing 121-122 for a 7-speed car and 119-120 for an automatic in great air.
S.