When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The current data is:
A) long tube heders sound better
B) long tube headers are not showing much gains (HP or TQ)
From this one would guess that short tube headers would neither sound much better nor make much HP or TQ.
Do a search on the forum. You will find that the mid length headers are producing about 15 - 20 HP at the rear wheel and slightly higher TQ numbers. You are giving up about 10 HP over the LT headers but you do not need to do a tune and possibly void some of your warranty. Also, the mid-length will greatly reduce the chance of getting a CEL light by running stock if you order them with the two CATS and run the factory two CATS that are currently on your car.
I think the bottom line is that on these cars bolt ons don't really do anything at all.
Intakes and headers and exhausts are not going to get you anything until you modify the internals (porting, cams, stroker, etc).
The external stuff is well optimized for the stock engine. I think it's a big reason we aren't seeing a ton of options out there. Of course the ones that are claim large gains......of course. I pulled my intake off yesterday and it has to be the most free flowing intake of any factory car I've had so far.
The biggest thing you can do on this car without getting into the motor is reducing under hood temps and reducing intake air charge temps. The fans blow right onto the intake and the car runs pretty hot (by design). That's where I would look first.
I think the bottom line is that on these cars bolt ons don't really do anything at all.
Intakes and headers and exhausts are not going to get you anything until you modify the internals (porting, cams, stroker, etc).
The external stuff is well optimized for the stock engine. I think it's a big reason we aren't seeing a ton of options out there. Of course the ones that are claim large gains......of course. I pulled my intake off yesterday and it has to be the most free flowing intake of any factory car I've had so far.
The biggest thing you can do on this car without getting into the motor is reducing under hood temps and reducing intake air charge temps. The fans blow right onto the intake and the car runs pretty hot (by design). That's where I would look first.
Mids do very little. Anyone who has been involved with these type of V8s knows that Long Tube Headers pay handsome dividends and even more with a tune. Sounds as if somebody has a lot to learn!
Mids do very little. Anyone who has been involved with these type of V8s knows that Long Tube Headers pay handsome dividends and even more with a tune. Sounds as if somebody has a lot to learn!
Long tubes pay "handsome" dividends on cars that have restrictive exhaust manifolds, like LS motors.
Welcome to the LTx world (again)....sounds like someone is living in the past.....
BTW, here is one of my previous cars. It had longtubes:
Over the in the Tech section, Vengeance Racing (forum vendor) has posted up two of their "VR500" builds which are essentially ARH catted mids and a Halltech CAI or Green filter. Gains have been +30 HP/TQ or more with no tune.
No affiliation on my part. Just some info to consider from what appears to be a well-sorted kit from a well-respected forum vendor. At least I'm considering it for mine...
Of course the ones that are claim large gains......of course.
Originally Posted by xp800
Gains have been +30 HP/TQ or more with no tune.
It's like a car company saying, "We make the best, fastest, most reliable, longest lasting car in the world!"
Do you believe them and buy only their car because their ad said so? I guess that's all it takes for some people.....
When you aren't a newbie you know what can be done with dynos, HP figures, etc. It has also been shown on this very website that an intake gains nothing, headers gain nothing, and that power gains come from the recalibration of the ECM...... people have installed the 30HP intakes and the 30HP headers and did not see gains.....I trust the people who spend the money, not the ones who sell the products (sorry to the vendors out there, but the responsibility of not spending my money stupidly is on me and it takes a lot more than internet claims).
When you aren't a newbie you know what can be done with dynos, HP figures, etc. It has also been shown on this very website that an intake gains nothing, headers gain nothing, and that power gains come from the recalibration of the ECM...... people have installed the 30HP intakes and the 30HP headers and did not see gains.....I trust the people who spend the money, not the ones who sell the products (sorry to the vendors out there, but the responsibility of not spending my money stupidly is on me and it takes a lot more than internet claims).
This is the key right here. Bolting anything onto a car without tuning the ECM will result in almost no gains. Only way to get more power out of anything is to simply tune the ECM. Back in the day even if you bolted a SC or Turbo kit you still had to install a chip or piggy back that tuned for you. A more plug and play but now a days when you install any part on to your engine in order to actually take advantage of it is to retune the car.
I trust the people who spend the money, not the ones who sell the products (sorry to the vendors out there, but the responsibility of not spending my money stupidly is on me and it takes a lot more than internet claims).
Originally Posted by MTI RACING
This is the key right here. Bolting anything onto a car without tuning the ECM will result in almost no gains. Only way to get more power out of anything is to simply tune the ECM. Back in the day even if you bolted a SC or Turbo kit you still had to install a chip or piggy back that tuned for you. A more plug and play but now a days when you install any part on to your engine in order to actually take advantage of it is to retune the car.
I get the skepticism. I tend to fall more in the 'prove it to me' category as well.
Where I struggle is discounting the dyno charts for both builds showing nearly the same outcome. Sure, data can be manipulated, etc. to show a desired result especially if one assumes bias or an agenda is involved. I get that. But should any quantitative data posted by a well-respected vendor be completely dismissed or assumed to be so biased as to be nearly useless?
I don't have anything resembling the experience and expertise of many folks here, and I'm really not trying to stir the pot. However at some point, and maybe it's naive on my part, I need to "accept" some of this data to be valid once I've considered its source. There have been repeatable results, and by more than one vendor who is respected.
My question is whether it's possible that the LT1 may be more 'enthusiastic' about mids (with no tune) than the LSx now that there is some population of data? And truly no pot-stirring intended; honest question.
I get the skepticism. I tend to fall more in the 'prove it to me' category as well.
Where I struggle is discounting the dyno charts for both builds showing nearly the same outcome. Sure, data can be manipulated, etc. to show a desired result especially if one assumes bias or an agenda is involved. I get that. But should any quantitative data posted by a well-respected vendor be completely dismissed or assumed to be so biased as to be nearly useless?
I don't have anything resembling the experience and expertise of many folks here, and I'm really not trying to stir the pot. However at some point, and maybe it's naive on my part, I need to "accept" some of this data to be valid once I've considered its source. There have been repeatable results, and by more than one vendor who is respected.
My question is whether it's possible that the LT1 may be more 'enthusiastic' about mids (with no tune) than the LSx now that there is some population of data? And truly no pot-stirring intended; honest question.
We have yet to test a set of Mid's. Once we do; however, I will be sure to post the results. As of yet all the C7's we have installed headers on have either been the Phaft long tubes or the American Racing long tubes.
It's like a car company saying, "We make the best, fastest, most reliable, longest lasting car in the world!"
Do you believe them and buy only their car because their ad said so? I guess that's all it takes for some people.....
When you aren't a newbie you know what can be done with dynos, HP figures, etc. It has also been shown on this very website that an intake gains nothing, headers gain nothing, and that power gains come from the recalibration of the ECM...... people have installed the 30HP intakes and the 30HP headers and did not see gains.....I trust the people who spend the money, not the ones who sell the products (sorry to the vendors out there, but the responsibility of not spending my money stupidly is on me and it takes a lot more than internet claims).
What ever you say Pal. Tell the guys at ARH, Kooks, Texas Speed, etc. that their LT Headers do absolutely nothing and that they are a total waste of money. Simply amazing nonsense. You really need to do some research or just stop assassinating the integrity of the sponsoring vendors here!
What ever you say Pal. Tell the guys at ARH, Kooks, Texas Speed, etc. that their LT Headers do absolutely nothing and that they are a total waste of money. Simply amazing nonsense. You really need to do some research or just stop assassinating the integrity of the sponsoring vendors here!
I am not saying headers and intake are not worth ANYthing.....I am saying that on a bone stock engine (LTx) you aren't going to get the gains you think you are going to get just by bolting them on.
Don't you find it even MILDLY interesting that the advertisements started stating "xxx gains WITH NO TUNE!!!" right at the same time manufacturers started specifically calling out tunes as potentially invalidating a warranty claim? Suddenly we don't need a tune to make the parts work right? Right......
Have some more respect for yourself. Think for yourself and trust your own mind.
There have been a lot of postings of dynos that show gains with mid and long headers...Wait let me rephrase that. There has been lots of postings of dynos by different shops of installs that they have completed that show gains with mid and long tube headers. I do think that without tuning, it is mostly likely not very much of a gain.
I have paraphrased below the VR installs linked in my previous post and the corresponding dynos.
For my benefit in understanding how to be a better critic and consumer of this sort of data, what would be the explanation for the results before and after and the gains published? For the sake of argument, let's assume what was done as far as the parts installed was accurate.