When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The mid-engine market is fairly crowded, with most of these manufacturers (Ferrari, lambo, audi, etc...) having lots of experience in this set up.
I would make the argument that Corvette owns the front engine sports car design. I don't think any manufacturer has gotten close to the engineering excellence that GM has with the Corvette.
Other than the benefits of making AWD easier, I'm not sure what's gained here except very little market share. It will subsequently hurt the perceived value of any front engine vettes. (one of the great things about Z06 and ZR1 is they maintain the same profile as the base model, both of these vehicles increased the perceived value of all corvettes in its generation.)
So my question is...why does GM feel they need to enter this market?
The mid-engine market is fairly crowded, with most of these manufacturers (Ferrari, lambo, audi, etc...) having lots of experience in this set up.
So my question is...why does GM feel they need to enter this market?
To keep pace with (or better) the fastest and most exotic cars in the world.
Certainly the current Corvette is remaining competitive with others using the front engine V8 Corvette design, but to make the jump past them, GM will have to break that paradigm. IMO.
I think Gm believes they can produce a car at $150K that will match or beat a car costing $1Mil.
To keep pace with (or better) the fastest and most exotic cars in the world.
Certainly the current Corvette is remaining competitive with others using the front engine V8 Corvette design, but to make the jump past them, GM will have to break that paradigm. IMO.
I think Gm believes they can produce a car at $150K that will match or beat a car costing $1Mil.
After owning a C7, I believe they can
Everyone has a different idea of what a mid-engine GM car should or would be.
Some want an affordable mid-engine Corvette similar to the C7 while others want something more exotic like a Ferrari or Lamborghini. Who knows what GM thinks, but a car with technology similar to the C7 won't be an exotic.
Everyone has a different idea of what a mid-engine GM car should or would be.
Some want an affordable mid-engine Corvette similar to the C7 while others want something more exotic like a Ferrari or Lamborghini. Who knows what GM thinks, but a car with technology similar to the C7 won't be an exotic.
Just curious, what technology do think they would need to change to make a mid-engine Corvette an exotic?
No bones about it here ... I hope GM does NOT EVER build a mid engined Corvette! Not a fan of the "cab forward" look necessitated by midship engines, ... and that name, 'Zora", oh my goodness!!!
Technically, our Vettes are already mid engine, since the engine is behind the front axle centers. The C6 engine pretty much lines up with the axle line, but they increased the setback with the C7. Still, most folks think of "mid engine" as behind the seats.
My concern is that many of us would be priced out of Vettes. According to the Black Book, they sold 37,238 in 2014. How many would they sell at 120 to 150K?
Also, many of us have always had manual trannies (my 2015 on order is, however, my first auto) and I agree with Bob Lutz (a pretty safe thing to do) that they would have to drop the manual.
I still feel more comfortable on the highway knowing that on the outside chance I hit something, that big engine gets there ahead of me, rather than trying to sandwich me in the middle.
There's no reason both couldn't be built on the same line if the same technology is deployed. Sure, it would take some plant rework but it's quite doable. There's also no reason to discontinue the current C7 to build a Zora variant. All it takes is money and a will by management to fund the project.
And at $120k they could probably sell 7500 per year. Increase Z06 allocation, go to 2 8 hour shifts in BG and you could possibly see 45000 - 50000 corvettes coming out of BG.
Tadge (Top Corvette Engineer) basically said in a statement recently that GM left everything on the table with the new Z06, and indicated there is no plan for a C7 ZR1 or mid engine corvette.
I think people are getting thier hopes up for nothing.
There's no reason both couldn't be built on the same line if the same technology is deployed. Sure, it would take some plant rework but it's quite doable.
From: Hamilton Square NJ, Ocean City N. J. Key Biscayne Fla.
Originally Posted by Stew24
No bones about it here ... I hope GM does NOT EVER build a mid engined Corvette! Not a fan of the "cab forward" look necessitated by midship engines, ... and that name, 'Zora", oh my goodness!!!
X 1,000. Not a fan of the long rear end look. The Vette, in every trim, has cornered the market on the longish hood, short deck look. I realize it is traction limited. But, how many of us really need every ounce of grip/acceleration? I could see a more "exotic" version, rear engine, ultra performance model being built next to the "lower" performance, current lay out. Which will still have killer street/track performance. And, GM should make the base a widebody w/ more HP.
No bones about it here ... I hope GM does NOT EVER build a mid engined Corvette! Not a fan of the "cab forward" look necessitated by midship engines, ... and that name, 'Zora", oh my goodness!!!
Nah - Zora is a great name for it if they build it, IMO. Everyone in the sports car world, domestic and foreign greatly respected Duntov, and he pushed early and often for a rear/mid-engine platform for the vette (which the bean counters always nixed).
From: KADS- If it has wings or an engine, I can break it. Dallas TX
New GT looks great.... and they are going to race it.
A mid engine vette would be a great battle.
I would welcome a mid engine vette. I think the the 458 and Ford GT are great looking cars. If GM could do something sexy, with top notch performance. It would be great boost.
I know this is the corvette forum, the old ways die hard. around here. I remember the months long threads about the C7 not having round taillights. and the C6 not having pop up headlights........ some guys on here never want to change.... which is fine. just buy and old vette and drive it till you die.
Just curious, what technology do think they would need to change to make a mid-engine Corvette an exotic?
Is a mid-engine car inherently more expensive to build than a front engine car? In other words, can GM build a mid-engine car like the C7 at the same price point as the C7? A car with ~500 hp, a lightweight aluminum frame, a little carbon fiber, a pretty nice interior and excellent handling?
If so, technology might not drive the cost of the car, but GM might decide to price the product in the $200-250K range and feel compelled to add some technology like a carbon fiber frame or body, four wheel steering, or a new V12 engine to sell it.
For all its excellence, the C7 is not exotic in the way a Ford GT is exotic.
Yes, I read the article and in the end both front engine cars lost out to the Porsche as the preferred sports car. Considering both the Corvette and the Ferrari beat it in most if not all measurable categories.
Yea, and ford has had over 50 years of experience with the ford gt.
GM is diving into uncharted, that it has limited experience in.
Lets be honest with ourselves here, you have a person who can afford a mid engine super car. Which will they buy? A 150k Mid Engine Vette or a 150k NSX or R8?
So the gain of selling a mid engine vette is ??? Meanwhile the risk is rather huge.