Front spoiler
Just nosy I suppose.
Then why was it removed from the Z51? It was initially intended to have one, like my Z51 C6 but it was said, "After final testing it was removed." Lots of speculation as to why but a recent video by Tadge about the Z06 as why it has no center section is very revealing. It reinforces comments made the the GM aerodynamicist John Bednarchick in a January 2014 article but makes his comment clear, John just said it provided better handling.
Tadge said at 150 mph the extra downforce provided by the center section made the car have a tendency to oversteer. He said it’s better to have slight understeer at high speeds! We old Corvair and the old Porsche folks know what high speed overstear is all about. Even with the recommended 16 psi in the front tires my modified Corvair had significant overstear. We had a saying that when you went to fast into a turn, "It’s better to go into the tree with the rear than the front!” But it happens very quickly and the normal reactions make it worse. However if too fast with an understeer car you’ll still hit the tree!
The comments about "It was removed to cool the rear brakes," (which it probably does but was that the main reason) IMO were marketing speak since they did not want to say the car was safer with it removed! The side air dams still push air around the tires and provide some reduced drag while not adding excess downforce.
Last edited by JerryU; Jun 9, 2015 at 06:07 PM.
My C6 Scrapped Skid Pad, Skid Pad Part, my C7 FANG Installed. That Sound, Which is Aluminum hitting Pavement is Much Worse Than Plastic on Pavement!
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Been following issue even before I received my C7 in October 2013. Lots of discussion and comments even from Chevy folks about why it was removed from the Z51. Prior to Tadge's statement I accepted the "aerodynamics are complex (which they are) and after the initial testing it was found "performance" was better with the center air dam removed.
I had added a rear spoiler and a large air dam to my 260Z, which improved the high speed stability as many were reporting it would. Then I hit a curb with the fiberglass air dam and had to remove it. While a waited for a new one to be delivered and painted the car was light even at 70 to 80 mph and got to a point of concern at higher speeds. You had to balance the added downforce of the rear spoiler with the air dam or it was worse than stock! With the air dam back on it was fine. Tadge just help define that they wanted less front downforce and that was achieved by removing the center section!
All cars are different and the C7 has an excellent shape to start, achieved with a lot of time in a wind tunnel.
I installed the splitter anyway, because in my opinion, it is a much more pleasing look, as the 2 front fangs by themselves just seem to look unfinished.
Now I have opened a claim number with GM Owner Assistance for the missing front splitter. Supposedly they are shipping one out to my local dealer for them to install !! Its funny GM said that the front splitter was not on the build sheet but the air dam was !! Go Figure !!
Last edited by lottavettes; Jun 4, 2015 at 08:10 PM.
On a Z51, does anybody know at what speeds the Z06 OEM splitter and side skirts become aerodynamically effective?
I think the front splitter also helps push more airflow up and through the grille. For those that have to run a front plate, it may help cooling.
Last edited by TEXHAWK0; Jun 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM.
The Chevy Volt has an air dam that is as low as the Corvette and GM says it extends the distance it can travel on batteries at highway speeds. Air dams are effective at reducing drag at highway speeds. Air dams also reduce front end lift but that is more an issue at high speeds (above highway speds.)
It was reported that the Z51 was to have a center air dam along with the two on the sides like the base car. In final testing it was removed.
GM's top aerodynamicist John Bednarchik was quoted as saying in an October 2, 2013 article about the 2014 C7: "Doing so required not only developing an aero-optimized grille and air dam, but also a removable center section for the Z51 performance option, to provide better stability at high rates of speed. Bednarchik points out that while shapes for improving fuel efficiency typically begin to have an effect at highway speeds, lift and drag components become critical from 150 mph to maximum velocity."
I wondered what he meant by "better stability." Then Tadge n a recent video said in essence, "We removed the center air dam to reduce front downforce so at high speeds the car understeers rather than oversteers. I provided a pic of understeer and oversteer if that is helpful.
Therefore I concluded that is the main reason the air dam was removed. For normal driving it would reduce drag but at high speeds it created more than the desired amount of downforce causing the possibility of the rear end getting loose first in a high speed turn. (Remember the Corvair, rear engine Porsches of that era, and the controversy started by Ralph Nader?) You can conclude what you wish but my Z51 did not come with a center air dam as most (if not all accept my mistake by a dealer.) I did not get mine in the hatch. My car was built in September 2013 so things could be different in regard to what is provided in the hatch but to my understanding all Z51's don't use a center air dam.
I'm just interpreting what I am reading and hearing.
If making a turn too fast you'll be off the road but with oversteer the rear of the car will hit a tree and with understeer you'll hit it head on!
Last edited by JerryU; Jun 5, 2015 at 09:02 PM.




At legal speeds the air dams, front splitters and rear spoilers do essentially nothing. Until you're way north of 100 mph they have no affect on handling.























