C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LT1 runs 87 octane?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 01:03 PM
  #41  
LDB's Avatar
LDB
Drifting
Conversation Starter
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 5
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 1,325
From: Houston Tx
Default

Originally Posted by JerryU
Respect your opinion. Sam's high test probably has some additive but since it is probably not consistent, understand why it's not labeled Top Tier. I used to fill my Street Rod (8.2 L BB) up in a small independent near where I lived. One day the owner showed me the gas deliveries he received and they were from all major brands! However that station was purchased and now also has crazy hi test pricing!
Was thinking I would use the GM additive twice a year in the C7 since I typically only put enough miles on for a once a year oil change. Would using Top Tier every 4th fill be worth the effort?
That’s about $100 per year at the prices you are quoting, making it another non-obvious answer. One of my uncertainties is that I saw very little data on direct injection engines before retiring 5 years ago. Directionally, top tier makes less difference for those engines since the detergent is less able to get at the intake valve stems. I don’t buy the extreme positions of some like COSpeed who say additives are totally worthless on DI valve stems, as there’s too much talk from reputable sources about pulsed injection cycles (meaning that at low to medium power settings, a brief pulse of fuel gets injected before the intake valve closes, and with its high pressure, some of it can penetrate against the incoming air and get as far as the valve stem). But it’s also clear that additives aren’t the total cleanliness answer for DI engines like they were for PFI engines. So unfortunately, you’re left having to make a choice on the basis of what feels right to you rather than what you can prove or be at least reasonably certain about.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 01:26 PM
  #42  
JerryU's Avatar
JerryU
E-Ray, 3LZ, ZER, LIFT
Supporting Lifetime Gold
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 34,840
Likes: 12,281
From: NE South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by LDB
That’s about $100 per year at the prices you are quoting, making it another non-obvious answer. One of my uncertainties is that I saw very little data on direct injection engines before retiring 5 years ago. Directionally, top tier makes less difference for those engines since the detergent is less able to get at the intake valve stems. I don’t buy the extreme positions of some like COSpeed who say additives are totally worthless on DI valve stems, as there’s too much talk from reputable sources about pulsed injection cycles (meaning that at low to medium power settings, a brief pulse of fuel gets injected before the intake valve closes, and with its high pressure, some of it can penetrate against the incoming air and get as far as the valve stem). But it’s also clear that additives aren’t the total cleanliness answer for DI engines like they were for PFI engines. So unfortunately, you’re left having to make a choice on the basis of what feels right to you rather than what you can prove or be at least reasonably certain about.
Thanks for the feedback. Think I'll look around for a Top Tier station with more reasonable hi test premium prices.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 01:28 PM
  #43  
gurneyeagle's Avatar
gurneyeagle
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 928
Likes: 633
Default

It's interesting to read about the various price spreads between regular and premium around the country. Here in the area of Houston where I live - The Museum District - the spread is around $0.40, sometimes higher.


Last week, I was in FL travelling on I-95 just south of St. Augustine. I needed to fill-up, and chose a Mobil station. When pulling in, I noted the regular price of $1.899. While filling up with premium, I realized they were charging $2.999 for the privilege!!!


I realize that was an anomaly of a "tourist trap" exit station, but the difference was surprising. For the remainder of the trip, I saw a spread from $0.30 to $0.60 per gallon of premium.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 02:01 PM
  #44  
tuned's Avatar
tuned
Advanced
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LDB
There’s a bit more to octane than that. Octane refers to a gasoline’s anti-knock characteristics. A rating of 100 was assigned to the specific compound 2,2,4 tri-methyl pentane. It was chosen because it makes up a major part of a blend component called alkylate, developed during WW2, which was one of the earliest high octane blend components. It’s also where the test’s name “octane” came from, because that compound has 8 carbon atoms, and is hence one of many octane isomers. The specific compound n-heptane was assigned an octane rating of zero. To determine the octane rating of any other material, you run it in a test engine to see where it’s anti-knock characteristics fall in relation to those two specific compounds. So for example, 93 octane would behave the same in the octane test engine as a blend of 93% 2,2,4 tri-methyl pentane and 7% n-heptane.

As a minor side issue, as others in this thread have noted, there are two different octane test methods, R and M. The difference is that in the test engine, you vary either compression ratio or spark advance, with the former giving an R octane rating and the latter an M octane rating. R numbers average about 10 higher than M. There are also some special rating methods for aviation gas involving rich mixtures and supercharging, that give numbers about 30 higher than R.

Temperature does have a modest effect on how much octane an engine requires, but it’s hard to determine the quantitative effect because there are offsetting issues. Higher temperature by itself increases the octane need, but reduces air density which reduces octane need (unless the engine is supercharged). The exact way those offset depends on the engine’s cooling system and computer control algorithms. Most of the numbers I’ve seen suggest that it takes an ambient temperature drop of at least 25 degrees and probably more to reduce octane need by one number. So since I don’t think Florida temperatures are all that much cooler during winter, if you’re using lower octane gas in the winter, it may simply be a case that your engine’s knock sensors are just cutting more timing when you’re using lower octane during the winter.

And finally, while I suppose it’s a minor point, it’s not so much that higher octane gas is harder to ignite, it’s that it’s less prone to detonate. All gas is very easily ignited by the spark plug. But the gas is supposed to burn rapidly once ignited, not explode. Sort of like going “phhhht” in a very rapid burning front across the combustion chamber, not “bang” throughout the whole combustion chamber all at once. It’s kind of like the difference between dropping a 5 pound steel ball versus a 5 pound rubber ball on your foot. They both deliver a 5 pound impact, but the rubber ball doesn’t hurt your foot as much.
I agree with u that it probably takes a -25 degree situation to take effect. My cooling fans did not come on til 225deg with stock. Now I run at 160 deg operating temp all the time. I don't agree that higher octane is not harder to ignite,cuz it is. It burns longer,and cooler during that burn too. Pre ignition is the cause of detonation. U could have the same engine with same octane, at 210deg it pre ignites. At 160deg it may not. Temperature is everything with how an engine runs,why it runs,and how it runs. Higher compression engines make more heat that is harder to dissipate. Anything above 11to1 probably is the cutoff. Go out to the yard with 2 gas cans premium/regular. Light a stick on fire and put it in both puddles for an experiment on the pavement. Depending on how hot or how cold it is outside will make the fuels burn the same,or burn different. I'm only referring to my tuned port injection 9.5to1 naturally aspirated motor. This is what I have seen driving this car and putting 225k on odometer. Not all vehicles will perform the same in different environments. I drive to the track,run consistent u.7 in 1/8mile. Been doing some rebuilding. I expect to be in lower 8's here in a month. Not bad for a poor man's toy who races 40,000$ cars and beats them by a fender

Last edited by tuned; Dec 31, 2015 at 02:08 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 04:22 PM
  #45  
LDB's Avatar
LDB
Drifting
Conversation Starter
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 5
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 1,325
From: Houston Tx
Default

Originally Posted by tuned
I agree with u that it probably takes a -25 degree situation to take effect. My cooling fans did not come on til 225deg with stock. Now I run at 160 deg operating temp all the time. I don't agree that higher octane is not harder to ignite,cuz it is. It burns longer,and cooler during that burn too. Pre ignition is the cause of detonation. U could have the same engine with same octane, at 210deg it pre ignites. At 160deg it may not. Temperature is everything with how an engine runs,why it runs,and how it runs. Higher compression engines make more heat that is harder to dissipate. Anything above 11to1 probably is the cutoff. Go out to the yard with 2 gas cans premium/regular. Light a stick on fire and put it in both puddles for an experiment on the pavement. Depending on how hot or how cold it is outside will make the fuels burn the same,or burn different. I'm only referring to my tuned port injection 9.5to1 naturally aspirated motor. This is what I have seen driving this car and putting 225k on odometer. Not all vehicles will perform the same in different environments. I drive to the track,run consistent u.7 in 1/8mile. Been doing some rebuilding. I expect to be in lower 8's here in a month. Not bad for a poor man's toy who races 40,000$ cars and beats them by a fender
Pre-ignition and knocking are two different things. I was describing knocking, which is the more common of the two in street engines. In knocking, nothing starts burning before the spark plug fires. Once the plug fires, combustion starts, which in turn causes a rapid pressure rise. That is supposed to happen in the “phhht” manner I described, but if octane rating is not high enough, the mixture can go “bang”, igniting at several places at once due to the pressure wave from the initial burning. In pre-ignition, combustion starts before the plug fires. It can be caused by a hot spot in the combustion chamber such as from deposits, or if the compression ratio is high enough, it can self-ignite like in a diesel. Pre-ignition is less common than knocking, and usually occurs only in highly modified, ultra high output motors, or in engines running very lean to maximize mileage. Detonation can result from either source. While I described it as happening from knocking after the spark plug fired, it can also happen from pre-ignition. Either way, it is harmful, and either way, higher octane fuel will prevent it.

As far as your burning experiment, it sounds to me more like you are describing a vapor pressure effect. On a hot day, the gas will evaporate much more quickly than on a cold day, so once you pour it on the ground, there is a bigger vapor cloud around it, so it is easier to ignite because of the vapor, and also burns faster because of the vapor. That has nothing to do with high or low octane. And if your high octane gas burns different from the low octane gas with both at the same temperature on the same day, odds are that the one that is burning slower or poorer has lower vapor pressure, probably because it has been in the can longer and the lighter components have weathered away. Another possibility if you were doing the experiment in fall or spring is that you got caught in the seasonal transition and your poor burning sample was lower vapor pressure summer gas, while the better burning sample was higher vapor pressure winter gas. Octane shouldn’t have a significant effect on the way gas burns when poured on the ground. Only vapor pressure and temperature should affect that.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 04:25 PM
  #46  
meyerweb's Avatar
meyerweb
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,941
Likes: 499
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Thanks LDB. Your explanation is much better than mine would have been. I'll only add that pouring gas on the ground and lighting it has about as much relationship to what goes on inside the cylinder of our engines as does lighting a candle.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 05:03 PM
  #47  
alamo1974's Avatar
alamo1974
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 83
From: boerne texas
Default

Originally Posted by Vetteman Jack
In a pinch it can run on regular, but I would put the recommended premium fuel in it.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 05:48 PM
  #48  
LDB's Avatar
LDB
Drifting
Conversation Starter
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 5
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 1,325
From: Houston Tx
Default

Originally Posted by meyerweb
Thanks LDB. Your explanation is much better than mine would have been. I'll only add that pouring gas on the ground and lighting it has about as much relationship to what goes on inside the cylinder of our engines as does lighting a candle.
You’re right on that. I thought about making that point, but figured I had said enough already. By the way, vapor pressure does impact how easily a cold engine will start, which is why vapor pressure specs are higher in winter. But once running, vapor pressure has essentially no effect. Even with that said, I don’t want to be too hard on Tuned. He apparently is doing well in competition, and has it right in that higher temperatures do present problems, particularly with highly modded racing engines. It’s just that the issues he’s trying to describe don’t have much relevance to a stock Vette engine, so I wouldn’t want people out there chasing or worrying about things that can’t help or hurt them.

I also thought of one other possible explanation for Tuned’s observations about high octane gas being more difficult to burn. If his high octane gas is a racing fuel rather than pump premium, racing fuels normally have ultra-low vapor pressure. That’s both to prevent vapor lock at high under-hood temps, and because lower vapor pressure normally means higher liquid density which means more energy per gallon or miles per gallon. So racing fuel would be difficult to light and would burn slower in Tuned’s experiment, but it would be because of the very low vapor pressure of racing fuel, not because of its high octane.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 1, 2016 | 10:32 AM
  #49  
thrilled's Avatar
thrilled
Safety Car
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 668
From: Kilmarnock Va
Default

Originally Posted by rkhegler
You guys are lucky. In our state, Nebraska, there is about an $0.80-$0.90 difference between mid-grade and premium fuel.
http://www.gasbuddy.com/Station/17244

Makes one think hard about using mid-grade. In some cases that means $17-$18 per fill up. Twice a month that comes to $36.00 or $432.00 annually. That is almost my annual insurance payment.
You have to pay to play.$432 is small money.I've left tips at restaurants more than that.Just joking.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2016 | 10:52 AM
  #50  
lex737's Avatar
lex737
Intermediate
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Default

I would like to thank MEYERWEB for his clear answer regarding the European vs US fuel ratings ! Very clear ! Much Appreciated !
Alex
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2016 | 11:06 AM
  #51  
CorvetteKing_Tony's Avatar
CorvetteKing_Tony
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,674
Likes: 142
From: Aubrey Texas
Default

I would not use 87 octane. I did it in my Escalade with a 6.2L and it would not run or pick up speed. They had to take gas out.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:00 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-1
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE
story-8
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

Slideshow: 5 most and least popular Corvette model years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 13:25:01


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette buyer's guide

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-17 16:41:08


VIEW MORE