C7 throttle response
#1
Team Owner
Thread Starter
C7 throttle response
Wanted to post my impression of this mod as the search didn't bring up much wrt the C7.
I have owned 2 C5's since 2001, a 2002 A4 (bought used and sold) and a 2002 M6 coupe (bought new and still have). The throttle response on those was always disappointing - I did somewhat remedy it on the M6 which I tuned myself with EFI Live after adding intake/heads/cam/headers/gears. However, the 4.10 diff I added was easily the closest thing to a throttle response cure and best performance bang-for-buck. I swapped in an intake, Yank converter, 3.42 diff and headers on the A4 and those with a little tuning helped to improve the response on that car. Neither approach was a panacea, though.
The 2014 Z51 M7 I recently picked up continued the GM tradition of built-in throttle lag so, needless to say, I was once again in search of a fix. Several C7 and many more C6 owners here have touted the Vitesse Throttle Controller as a plug-n-play solution to sluggish throttle response. Normally, I would have chalked this up to hype but I heavily swayed by the overall enthusiasm of those using it on this board and the low investment required. At 179 bones, not much of a risk if it was a bunch of hoo-ha. So I ordered one . . .
I installed it last week but, due to some other considerations that arose (including the SoCal version of a hurricane ), I wasn't able to road test it until this morning. Installation is simple and straightforward and definitely PnP. Simply remove the plug over the one screw holding the go-pedal down, pull the pedal away from the floorboard, unplug the throttle harness, plug the Vitesse harness in between the stock connectors then replace the go-pedal. I unplugged the user interface box from the controller and ran the harness next to the right side steering column to the center stack and reconnected it to the controller box which I tucked behind the top of the carpet that runs along the side of the tunnel next to the center stack after wrapping the harness with high-temp insulation to protect it from the tunnel heat. I mounted the user box with the supplied adhesive foam next to the steering column on the right side low on the dash but will probably move it a bit higher for better access and to keep my right knee from accidentally hitting it when getting in/out. I made sure the harness next to the go-pedal was securely in place to prevent it becoming disconnected accidentally. Easy install.
So - my performance impressions: I was impressed - I mean, really impressed. You can set the throttle response from ultra-molasses-and-much-slower-than-stock to instantly-sling-the-tires-off-the-rear-wheels-while-you-launch-the-car-into-orbit just by repeatedly pressing one of the appropriate buttons on the user box. Setting A (Economy mode button) decreases the throttle response - it opens the throttle blade to "help you save gas", according to the instructions. EC7 is the most economical mode. Setting B (Sport mode button) increases the throttle response, SP0 being stock all the way to SP9 which the highest setting. You press the button repeatedly to sequentially advance through the mode until it cycles back to SP0.
The change in throttle response is dramatic - I was able to feel a significant difference, even at SP2 and SP3, but at SP5 it was a visceral change to the feel of the car. I drove it at SP7 for most of the 2 hours of driving I did but I did move it up and down to appreciate the range of adjustment. I got used to the new feel quickly but some discretion is definitely called for in colder-temp launches (it's in the 50's here in SoCal ). Even with the new rear MPSS 295's I have, the risk of spinning is multiplied. And the effect is linear and consistent, regardless of the gear or speed. Frankly, it's addictive - there's no going back for me. IMO, this is how GM should deliver the Corvette to it's customers. This is something that can probably be accomplished with tuning software but the extra advantage is that you can effect real-time changes rather than to have to upload new tunes whenever you feel the need for a change. Also, you can retard the response to the point it acts as a sort of mild valet mode.
Anyway, I like it. It's an effective mod almost anyone can apply in a few minutes for not a lot of scratch and it's totally reversible - you can yank with 10 minutes notice if the need arises.
As always, just my $.02
I have owned 2 C5's since 2001, a 2002 A4 (bought used and sold) and a 2002 M6 coupe (bought new and still have). The throttle response on those was always disappointing - I did somewhat remedy it on the M6 which I tuned myself with EFI Live after adding intake/heads/cam/headers/gears. However, the 4.10 diff I added was easily the closest thing to a throttle response cure and best performance bang-for-buck. I swapped in an intake, Yank converter, 3.42 diff and headers on the A4 and those with a little tuning helped to improve the response on that car. Neither approach was a panacea, though.
The 2014 Z51 M7 I recently picked up continued the GM tradition of built-in throttle lag so, needless to say, I was once again in search of a fix. Several C7 and many more C6 owners here have touted the Vitesse Throttle Controller as a plug-n-play solution to sluggish throttle response. Normally, I would have chalked this up to hype but I heavily swayed by the overall enthusiasm of those using it on this board and the low investment required. At 179 bones, not much of a risk if it was a bunch of hoo-ha. So I ordered one . . .
I installed it last week but, due to some other considerations that arose (including the SoCal version of a hurricane ), I wasn't able to road test it until this morning. Installation is simple and straightforward and definitely PnP. Simply remove the plug over the one screw holding the go-pedal down, pull the pedal away from the floorboard, unplug the throttle harness, plug the Vitesse harness in between the stock connectors then replace the go-pedal. I unplugged the user interface box from the controller and ran the harness next to the right side steering column to the center stack and reconnected it to the controller box which I tucked behind the top of the carpet that runs along the side of the tunnel next to the center stack after wrapping the harness with high-temp insulation to protect it from the tunnel heat. I mounted the user box with the supplied adhesive foam next to the steering column on the right side low on the dash but will probably move it a bit higher for better access and to keep my right knee from accidentally hitting it when getting in/out. I made sure the harness next to the go-pedal was securely in place to prevent it becoming disconnected accidentally. Easy install.
So - my performance impressions: I was impressed - I mean, really impressed. You can set the throttle response from ultra-molasses-and-much-slower-than-stock to instantly-sling-the-tires-off-the-rear-wheels-while-you-launch-the-car-into-orbit just by repeatedly pressing one of the appropriate buttons on the user box. Setting A (Economy mode button) decreases the throttle response - it opens the throttle blade to "help you save gas", according to the instructions. EC7 is the most economical mode. Setting B (Sport mode button) increases the throttle response, SP0 being stock all the way to SP9 which the highest setting. You press the button repeatedly to sequentially advance through the mode until it cycles back to SP0.
The change in throttle response is dramatic - I was able to feel a significant difference, even at SP2 and SP3, but at SP5 it was a visceral change to the feel of the car. I drove it at SP7 for most of the 2 hours of driving I did but I did move it up and down to appreciate the range of adjustment. I got used to the new feel quickly but some discretion is definitely called for in colder-temp launches (it's in the 50's here in SoCal ). Even with the new rear MPSS 295's I have, the risk of spinning is multiplied. And the effect is linear and consistent, regardless of the gear or speed. Frankly, it's addictive - there's no going back for me. IMO, this is how GM should deliver the Corvette to it's customers. This is something that can probably be accomplished with tuning software but the extra advantage is that you can effect real-time changes rather than to have to upload new tunes whenever you feel the need for a change. Also, you can retard the response to the point it acts as a sort of mild valet mode.
Anyway, I like it. It's an effective mod almost anyone can apply in a few minutes for not a lot of scratch and it's totally reversible - you can yank with 10 minutes notice if the need arises.
As always, just my $.02
The following 10 users liked this post by Patches:
2FAST4U (05-31-2016),
axr6 (12-28-2015),
BenCasey (12-28-2015),
Enderscz (01-04-2016),
Flyingscot (01-01-2016),
and 5 others liked this post.
#2
Moderator
I don't see a throttle controller for the C7 on their website.
#3
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Big Bend Country, TX
Posts: 29,114
Received 2,186 Likes
on
1,337 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15- '16-'17-‘18-‘19-'20-'21
NCM Lifetime Member
It's there. Have to hit the little scroll arrow on the right of the first page. Took my old eyes a moment to find it. It's that light in color. http://www.vitesse-motorsports.com/t...orvette-c7.htm
The following users liked this post:
2FAST4U (05-28-2016)
#4
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Big Bend Country, TX
Posts: 29,114
Received 2,186 Likes
on
1,337 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15- '16-'17-‘18-‘19-'20-'21
NCM Lifetime Member
Their disclaimer .........
CAUTION:
Engine-related Performance Parts are intended for the experienced driver only. Our Throttle Controllers must not be used on public roads and in some cases may be restricted to closed course competition or Off Road use only.
Engine-related Performance Parts are intended for the experienced driver only. Our Throttle Controllers must not be used on public roads and in some cases may be restricted to closed course competition or Off Road use only.
The following users liked this post:
itaylorm (05-11-2017)
#5
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Big Bend Country, TX
Posts: 29,114
Received 2,186 Likes
on
1,337 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15- '16-'17-‘18-‘19-'20-'21
NCM Lifetime Member
The bigger question is, will the ecm be capable of capturing a snapshot per se of the modules use ? If so, it doesn't matter how removable from the system the part is should a issue arise.
#6
Moderator
It's there. Have to hit the little scroll arrow on the right of the first page. Took my old eyes a moment to find it. It's that light in color. http://www.vitesse-motorsports.com/t...orvette-c7.htm
I saw that. They obviously have legal counsel.
#7
Team Owner
very interesting and informative read, thank you. I installed a company's software that promises up a 20 bhp bump, quicker throttle response and skip shift, well let's just say that the skip shift is the only difference that I noticed.
As MikeyTX said, will it be traceable and if it isn't will it void any part of the factory warranty?
Again, great write up, perhaps a few pics of your install process.
As MikeyTX said, will it be traceable and if it isn't will it void any part of the factory warranty?
Again, great write up, perhaps a few pics of your install process.
Last edited by themonk; 12-28-2015 at 10:27 PM.
#8
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Big Bend Country, TX
Posts: 29,114
Received 2,186 Likes
on
1,337 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15- '16-'17-‘18-‘19-'20-'21
NCM Lifetime Member
monk, you nailed it ! That is my concern. Their disclaimer is a massive red flag imho.
#9
Team Owner
#10
Le Mans Master
Good write-up. Thanks for sharing...
#11
Team Owner
Thread Starter
Good question about traceability and it's healthy to question it
First of all, I never recommend anyone to mod/tamper with their car if they're uncomfortble with the possibility of a warranty claim being denied if the mod os found to have caused th failure (Magnuson-Moss Act). Second, virtually every vendor offering performance or other enhancements has disclaimers placing the burden of proof on the buyer/installer.
My understanding is that this product cannot be detected if it is not present on the vehicle at the time of inspection. This may or may not be true but , in the various threads, especially C6 threads, I read, there wasn't a single mention of failure of or failure caused by the Vitesse Controller, nor was there a recounting of a service incident where recorded evidence of the controller use on the car was revealed by a dealer inspection of PCM data.
That said, I will make the disclaimer I should have prefaced my frst post with: I'm not endorsing the use or clams of this product or its manufacturer and in no way recommend the use of this product on/in your vehicle. I am not liable for any damages/losses you may incur due to the installation or use of this product. The descriptions I have provided with respect to this product are purely for entertainment purposes.
I have been pretty heavily modding my Vettes for many years - the C5 I currently have I had torn apart with less than 3k miles on it. So, maybe I'm not the one to ask about warranty risks. However, as mods go, this is one of the least invasive and probably innocuous when compared to the benefit it delivers and to it's detectability when not present.
Also, it'd probably be a good idea to email the vendor and inquire about warranty implications, although, I'm sure you'll get the the "offroad use only" response if the vendor knows what's what.
First of all, I never recommend anyone to mod/tamper with their car if they're uncomfortble with the possibility of a warranty claim being denied if the mod os found to have caused th failure (Magnuson-Moss Act). Second, virtually every vendor offering performance or other enhancements has disclaimers placing the burden of proof on the buyer/installer.
My understanding is that this product cannot be detected if it is not present on the vehicle at the time of inspection. This may or may not be true but , in the various threads, especially C6 threads, I read, there wasn't a single mention of failure of or failure caused by the Vitesse Controller, nor was there a recounting of a service incident where recorded evidence of the controller use on the car was revealed by a dealer inspection of PCM data.
That said, I will make the disclaimer I should have prefaced my frst post with: I'm not endorsing the use or clams of this product or its manufacturer and in no way recommend the use of this product on/in your vehicle. I am not liable for any damages/losses you may incur due to the installation or use of this product. The descriptions I have provided with respect to this product are purely for entertainment purposes.
I have been pretty heavily modding my Vettes for many years - the C5 I currently have I had torn apart with less than 3k miles on it. So, maybe I'm not the one to ask about warranty risks. However, as mods go, this is one of the least invasive and probably innocuous when compared to the benefit it delivers and to it's detectability when not present.
Also, it'd probably be a good idea to email the vendor and inquire about warranty implications, although, I'm sure you'll get the the "offroad use only" response if the vendor knows what's what.
Last edited by Patches; 12-28-2015 at 11:00 PM.
#12
Drifting
Patches.........Please, post some pictures of where you installed the throttle controller. Is it possible to install the controller inside the center counsel glove box? I bought a Vitesse Throttle Controller, but will have to wait till spring to install it. The C6 section is full of people raving about the throttle controller.
#16
Team Owner
Thread Starter
To me, this improves the entire C7 driving experience because it makes the driver feel like he/she has better control of the vehicle. It ups the quality of the driving experience, even if you're just commuting or taking a drive on a country road.
Yes
#17
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2015
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,223
Received 1,694 Likes
on
1,240 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
I've seen this and the c6 guys loving it, and was curious about it. Have you done anything else to your ride besides this?
Nice write up, thanks!
Nice write up, thanks!
#18
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Big Bend Country, TX
Posts: 29,114
Received 2,186 Likes
on
1,337 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15- '16-'17-‘18-‘19-'20-'21
NCM Lifetime Member
Good question about traceability and it's healthy to question it
First of all, I never recommend anyone to mod/tamper with their car if they're uncomfortble with the possibility of a warranty claim being denied if the mod os found to have caused th failure (Magnuson-Moss Act). Second, virtually every vendor offering performance or other enhancements has disclaimers placing the burden of proof on the buyer/installer.
My understanding is that this product cannot be detected if it is not present on the vehicle at the time of inspection. This may or may not be true but , in the various threads, especially C6 threads, I read, there wasn't a single mention of failure of or failure caused by the Vitesse Controller, nor was there a recounting of a service incident where recorded evidence of the controller use on the car was revealed by a dealer inspection of PCM data.
That said, I will make the disclaimer I should have prefaced my frst post with: I'm not endorsing the use or clams of this product or its manufacturer and in no way recommend the use of this product on/in your vehicle. I am not liable for any damages/losses you may incur due to the installation or use of this product. The descriptions I have provided with respect to this product are purely for entertainment purposes.
I have been pretty heavily modding my Vettes for many years - the C5 I currently have I had torn apart with less than 3k miles on it. So, maybe I'm not the one to ask about warranty risks. However, as mods go, this is one of the least invasive and probably innocuous when compared to the benefit it delivers and to it's detectability when not present.
Also, it'd probably be a good idea to email the vendor and inquire about warranty implications, although, I'm sure you'll get the the "offroad use only" response if the vendor knows what's what.
First of all, I never recommend anyone to mod/tamper with their car if they're uncomfortble with the possibility of a warranty claim being denied if the mod os found to have caused th failure (Magnuson-Moss Act). Second, virtually every vendor offering performance or other enhancements has disclaimers placing the burden of proof on the buyer/installer.
My understanding is that this product cannot be detected if it is not present on the vehicle at the time of inspection. This may or may not be true but , in the various threads, especially C6 threads, I read, there wasn't a single mention of failure of or failure caused by the Vitesse Controller, nor was there a recounting of a service incident where recorded evidence of the controller use on the car was revealed by a dealer inspection of PCM data.
That said, I will make the disclaimer I should have prefaced my frst post with: I'm not endorsing the use or clams of this product or its manufacturer and in no way recommend the use of this product on/in your vehicle. I am not liable for any damages/losses you may incur due to the installation or use of this product. The descriptions I have provided with respect to this product are purely for entertainment purposes.
I have been pretty heavily modding my Vettes for many years - the C5 I currently have I had torn apart with less than 3k miles on it. So, maybe I'm not the one to ask about warranty risks. However, as mods go, this is one of the least invasive and probably innocuous when compared to the benefit it delivers and to it's detectability when not present.
Also, it'd probably be a good idea to email the vendor and inquire about warranty implications, although, I'm sure you'll get the the "offroad use only" response if the vendor knows what's what.
#19
Team Owner
Thread Starter
Understood, Mike, and my other posts above have warned off those not willing to risk it. Every mod has it's risks, whether it adds minimal or greater possibility of contributing to the failure of another component/system and, as I wrote above, every owner contemplating any mod needs to be informed and consenting to those risks. As I mentioned, I personally decimated my current C5 warranty months after taking delivery back in 2002 with full knowledge that, if the drivetrain blew up when I first started it after installing heads/cam, the onus was on me - and only me - to foot the bill to fix it. I do the same with my C7, as do many of the other C7 owners here - whether they realize it and acknowledge it is another story.
It's also up to each individual owner to own up to their responsibility if something does go wrong as a result of a mod they installed/had installed and they then request repair under warranty. I have read posts here over the years where someone has alluded to removing a mod which was potentially a contributor of a failure to try and mask the source during the service tech's root-cause investigation - this is entirely possible with many pure mechanical or other non-registering type mods. This has been a controversial debate issue here and rages on to this day. However, if the mod is left in place and the dealer identifies it as the cause for failure prematurely without due process, the owner has recourse to request independent review.
Think about many of the mods we take for granted here and consider well within the scope of impunity from warranty failure indictment. Floor mats - what could possibly go wrong? Ask Toyota. A CF engine cover? What if the engine overheated and the service tech identified the CF cover as the source due to insufficient airflow caused by out-of-spec material, shape, thickness, etc. And the examples are almost without limit.
I didn't plan on making this a thread about the warranty implications of the product - everyone here SHOULD be an informed consumer so it's up to each person to decide if they're willing to take on the burden of responsibility. That goes for every single mod ever mentioned on this board. I'm not going to debate the MLM Warranty law application subtleties as I'm not an attorney. Bottom line is, make the decision for yourself. I think we've adequately exposed the potential risk associated with this product now so I'd suggest starting a new thread on the warranty implications of aftermarket/non-sanctioned modifications to covered vehicles if you'd like to expand on the discussion.
It's also up to each individual owner to own up to their responsibility if something does go wrong as a result of a mod they installed/had installed and they then request repair under warranty. I have read posts here over the years where someone has alluded to removing a mod which was potentially a contributor of a failure to try and mask the source during the service tech's root-cause investigation - this is entirely possible with many pure mechanical or other non-registering type mods. This has been a controversial debate issue here and rages on to this day. However, if the mod is left in place and the dealer identifies it as the cause for failure prematurely without due process, the owner has recourse to request independent review.
Think about many of the mods we take for granted here and consider well within the scope of impunity from warranty failure indictment. Floor mats - what could possibly go wrong? Ask Toyota. A CF engine cover? What if the engine overheated and the service tech identified the CF cover as the source due to insufficient airflow caused by out-of-spec material, shape, thickness, etc. And the examples are almost without limit.
I didn't plan on making this a thread about the warranty implications of the product - everyone here SHOULD be an informed consumer so it's up to each person to decide if they're willing to take on the burden of responsibility. That goes for every single mod ever mentioned on this board. I'm not going to debate the MLM Warranty law application subtleties as I'm not an attorney. Bottom line is, make the decision for yourself. I think we've adequately exposed the potential risk associated with this product now so I'd suggest starting a new thread on the warranty implications of aftermarket/non-sanctioned modifications to covered vehicles if you'd like to expand on the discussion.
The following users liked this post:
Bill17601 (12-29-2015)
#20
Team Owner
Thread Starter
Only had the car for a couple of months so the only additions to date are a Blendmount V1 mirror mount and an MGW shifter, both quality mods for a dd. Oh, I did have replace the rear tires almost immediately as the PO had driven the car the way it was meant to be driven.