When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
On a 1300 hundred mile trip I did the first 650 in Reg V4 mode with the A8 it was shifting continuosly and got 29.4 MPG. On the second 650 mile segment I used the Range V4 disabler and got 28.9 MPG, both segments were at 78 to 80 MPH, in my opinion the disabler is the only way to go.
Unless you do the same route in the same direction, you can't really compare the trips properly. I do a 225 mile trip frequently going from south NY State to north NY state. I always get 2-3 mpg better going north than going the same trip south regardless of which vehicle I use. The explanation for this is that I must do less uphill going north than I do going south. This is true even though I do not notice any differences in the direction of elevation, they are there none the less. On my C5 I have gotten 33 mpg going north and 30 mpg going south. On my C6 Z06 I have gotten 27 mpg going north and 24.5 going south. On my Toyota I have gotten 39 mpg going north and 36 mpg going south. In all cases I used the cruse control and used the same settings. The only real consistency was I always get better mileage going north than south on the same highways.
i'm at 400 miles now...didn't know there was 4 cyl operation before 300 miles, and didn't know anything was wrong until this thread. does anyone really read their owners manual the first day? my wife accused me of babying the car which makes me believe if was probably running on 4 cyl.
If it's important, then I'd assume the car wouldn't enable it before 500 miles. The thing about electronics is they can be smart. Like the adjusting Redline value on the RPM gauge.
If it's important, then I'd assume the car wouldn't enable it before 500 miles. The thing about electronics is they can be smart. Like the adjusting Redline value on the RPM gauge.
They might have had to leave it on to be considered for EPA certification, especially for the automatics. I tried it before the first 500 miles, but didn't use it for a long time until I hit 800 or so.
ok, i found the 4/8 on the dash readout. It spends a LOT of time in 4 cyl. i also found that paddle shifters are useless for me. the car shifts way better than i ever could!
For engine longevity you do not want it continually going from Firing on 8 cyl to 4 cyl. When I picked it up from the museum they told me to keep the A8 in manual so it would fire on all 8 cyl during the 500 mile break in.
It's not the best for the rings and Pistons in the 4 cylinders to not be under compression. These engines tend to use more oil after about 40,000 miles.
Google AFM (active fuel management) and GM engines problems you will find plenty of evidence of this. In fact my 2013 Avalance with 50,000 miles started using oil and had to have new rings and Pistons installed, I was lucky that it was still under warranty. You can sometime feel the engine vibrate as its going back to 8 cyl if you give it light throttle I put the Range AFM eliminator on the Avalanche after the rebuild and I also put one on my 2016 ZO6. If you aren't going to keep the car to that mileage then it's probably not worth doing anything.
All the talk about engine longevity is irrelevant. No one is going to run a Corvette motor for 300k miles. This isn't a Toyota pickup truck and 99.9% of corvettes will never even see 100k miles.
I have the Range AFM disabler in my 14 Z51 A6. When on extended highway stretches, I set it to Eco and turn off the disabler (AFM is enabled) to maximize the mpg. When around town, I am usually in sport/manual or touring with AFM disabled.
The only thing I don't like about V4 mode is the noise. The oil scavenging pump makes a funny running water sound, though that could be more a result of my dry sump and not entirely AFM related.
Anyway, I am a believer. I will take the 1.5 - 2 mpg benefit that I regularly see with AFM enabled.