When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm not an expert but I do own an A8 and believe it does work with an auto. Try using the paddles to downshift from say 4th to 2nd quickly, you will hear and feel the car revmatch. But be prepared to be surprised and jolted as the gears kick in. I could be wrong about this and what I have experienced could very well be called something else in the A8 toolbox!
also, on an M7 car it is my understanding that the car can determine from where you are moving the shifter, up or down, it will determine the correct Rev Match to apply.
That is the torque converter - There is no rev match with an automatic.
You are correct - you are not an expert nor an engineer!
Your belief does not make it a reality.
If you don't believe me - Ask Tadge !
When all else fails - read the manual
1-16
Active Rev Match (Manual
Transmission)
Vehicles equipped with a manual
transmission have Active Rev Match
(ARM).
Read - MANUAL TRANSMISSIONS !
Last edited by Stangslayer; Sep 12, 2016 at 06:47 AM.
You most certainly DO still having "engine braking" w/ rev-match.
Once you've made a downshift, lifting the throttle and being in lower gear, by definition, is going to slow you down quicker than lifting the throttle in higher gear. I think the person who complained about that was perceiving the absence of the forward, head-snapping jolt to be a lack of engine-braking.
I've been rev-matching manually for smooth downshifts for years and for the purpose of engine-braking, without the forward jolt. Rev-matching, whether doing it yourself, or using auto-rev match is also a good way to prolong the life of your clutch.
You most certainly DO still having "engine braking" w/ rev-match.
Once you've made a downshift, lifting the throttle and being in lower gear, by definition, is going to slow you down quicker than lifting the throttle in higher gear. I think the person who complained about that was perceiving the absence of the forward, head-snapping jolt to be a lack of engine-braking.
I've been rev-matching manually for smooth downshifts for years and for the purpose of engine-braking, without the forward jolt. Rev-matching, whether doing it yourself, or using auto-rev match is also a good way to prolong the life of your clutch.
As you say the key is to downshift smoothly without the "jolt." That jolt not only is hard on the drivetrain but also "jerks" the rear. That is great if you want to get the rear to side out (oversteer) like trail braking etc. But not good when you don't and are trying to achieve max cornering!
I'm reminded of my understeering, front wheel drive Dodge Colt Turbo. [Side Bar: Had to buy it to replace my CJ5 when I moved to CT. When we could only buy gas every other day the CJ could not make it to Lagurdia Airport and back on a tank of gas!] To get the Colt rear to come around and the car pointed in the right direction after a turn, held the button on the emergency brake and modulated the rear brakes to load those tires. As the rear slide out it felt like my old Corvair in a controlled oversteer!
A professional driver testing the C7 at Road Atlanta said he found rev match allowed him to concentrate on his braking spot and not having to make a perfect match to be sure he did not upset the car!
The only thing I don't like about rev matching is I like the engine braking when downshifting instead of using my brakes-hence the reason I do not use rev match full time. other than that it is really a fun thing to play with.
Uh, you still have engine braking with rev-matching. Read the two posts directly above yours. You must just enjoy the "jolt," but your car doesn't.
If you are downshifting to slow down without rev-matching, you should be aware that brake pads are pocket change compared to the big dollar cost of replacing a clutch-pressure plate.
Uh, you still have engine braking with rev-matching. Read the two posts directly above yours. You must just enjoy the "jolt," but your car doesn't.
If you are downshifting to slow down without rev-matching, you should be aware that brake pads are pocket change compared to the big dollar cost of replacing a clutch-pressure plate.
This. Jesus, please don't downshift without rev matching
The only thing I don't like about rev matching is I like the engine braking when downshifting instead of using my brakes-hence the reason I do not use rev match full time. other than that it is really a fun thing to play with.
That is more like "clutch-braking", and "clutch-wearing", and possibly "rear-wheel locking". Please don't do this in the rain.
Rev match almost got my *** beat in a Wal Mart parking lot the other day...I was pulling into the parking lot and I downshifted while these 2 people (guy and girl with kid in tow) were crossing the parking lot in front of me (pretty far in front of me I might add). So I downshifted and touched the brake and the engine revved a little bit. This guy thought I was revving my engine to his wife and got all irate and threatened to smash the windows if I parked it and told me several times to get out of the car. I tried explaining the rev match to this dirtbag but he was not hearing it...so I went to another Wal Mart. In my younger days things would have been much different. So now I turn off rev match in parking lots.
Uh, you still have engine braking with rev-matching. Read the two posts directly above yours. You must just enjoy the "jolt," but your car doesn't.
If you are downshifting to slow down without rev-matching, you should be aware that brake pads are pocket change compared to the big dollar cost of replacing a clutch-pressure plate.
Not pushing anyone to use Rev Match, their car do as they wish. However wonder if they may be shifting too slow??
One of my best examples where I tried with my C6 and heel-toe and only half the time it was perfect (the other 1/2 OK but not perfect) is my transition from a 4 lane 60 mph limit divided highway near my house to the single, narrow, 25 mph limit lane, one way road a large fountain where I live. I go from 5th and for fun often hit the brakes hard and downshift directly to 3rd before turning in! Lots of engine braking BUT it has to be done quickly.
If that was the Andrette hairpin at Laguna Seca and I was coming into it at ~150 mph, I'd go thru 4th first but at 65 mph, ~2200 rpm and going to only ~4000 the 5th to 3rd is fine!
Rev match almost got my *** beat in a Wal Mart parking lot the other day...I was pulling into the parking lot and I downshifted while these 2 people (guy and girl with kid in tow) were crossing the parking lot in front of me (pretty far in front of me I might add). So I downshifted and touched the brake and the engine revved a little bit. This guy thought I was revving my engine to his wife and got all irate and threatened to smash the windows if I parked it and told me several times to get out of the car. I tried explaining the rev match to this dirtbag but he was not hearing it...so I went to another Wal Mart. In my younger days things would have been much different. So now I turn off rev match in parking lots.
Hint: Rev match isn't what almost got your *** beat... A douchebag who thinks the world revolves around himself (and his wife) is who almost got your *** beat. Trust me, if it wasn't a rev, it would have been something else. If not you, somebody else.
Last edited by joemosfet; Sep 12, 2016 at 12:25 PM.
I could construct several very different mental images of what actually happened using the same words, and at least one of them would have made be angry if walking in a parking lot with my wife and child.
At acceptable parking lot speeds, I can't imagine auto rev-match even being audible to a pedestrian. As for me, in a parking lot, I'm crawling at about idle in 1st gear because too many bad things can happen there.
Rev-match in this car is ill-conceived. Always sounds like it over-revs and I can do a better job myself.
My take is that it works perfectly if you shift properly, and suspect you're either under-revving when you match manually or shifting too slowly w/ auto rev match.
I could construct several very different mental images of what actually happened using the same words, and at least one of them would have made be angry if walking in a parking lot with my wife and child.
At acceptable parking lot speeds, I can't imagine auto rev-match even being audible to a pedestrian. As for me, in a parking lot, I'm crawling at about idle in 1st gear because too many bad things can happen there.
Eh, I've had my exhaust in sport mode (or open with W2M on C6) and people yell at me to slow down when I'm going well below the speed limit (IE: 20 in a residential zone or just normal speed in a parking lot) when I'm in first gear. If you've ever owned a sport bike and ridden down a residential street in first gear, you know what I mean. This is double true if you live on a street with tight/tall walls.
I had a construction worker scream at me because I went 4-3-2 pulling up to a tight construction zone.
Looks fast, sounds fast, must be fast.
Originally Posted by motomanvette
Rev-match in this car is ill-conceived. Always sounds like it over-revs and I can do a better job myself.
It's damn near perfect for me. I don't even think about rev matching anymore.
I describe rev match with 3 words - No engine braking. People with manual trannys know that if you downshift into a gear it can slow you down if the RPMs are below the RPMs needed to maintain the current speed. That's called engine braking. With RM there is no engine braking because the computer matches the RPMs needed to be traveling at this speed as you are going into the gear the computer sensed you are selecting.
Engine braking is just letting your foot of the gas and happens any time you're in gear and RPMs are above idle.
I only have a C6, but my understanding of the Rev Match function in the C7s was that it just blips the throttle for you during a shift. After you engage the gear there is no automatic acceleration control at that point, so you would engine brake as usual.