When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
That part is true. I wear a Timex Ironman and make fun of the Rolex folks. You have to take a look at the MGW and the stock parts side by side to understand why there is such a dramatic difference in the feel.
That part is true. I wear a Timex Ironman and make fun of the Rolex folks. You have to take a look at the MGW and the stock parts side by side to understand why there is such a dramatic difference in the feel.
If you took the time to look at the components used to make a Rolex as compared to your Timex, how they are manufactured, the time spent hand-finishing / fitting, quality of materials used, etc., then you would understand why there is such a dramatic difference between the two. Same logic applies from your statement of the MGW. It's all a matter of perspective. Both watches tell time just as both shifters will move you from gear to gear, but I can tell you which ones I'd rather have.
Last edited by MeHeartCorvettes; Dec 6, 2016 at 09:37 AM.
That's kinda what I was thinking. I think the OEM shifter is already short-throw and don't find it to be "imprecise" at all. I'm not sure I want "bolt-action" on my shifter either, but I'd like to compare them side-by-side, which I should have a chance to do in the not-too-distant future.
Have installed aftermarket shifters in other cars and in my S10 truck. Did not feel it was needed in my C6 or C7.
However I did change the shift ****, which I think is a significant improvement. I installed the large cue ball size **** that is available from the aftermarket. First, it sits lower on the shift arm so provides about a 12% shorter shift. As important, IMO is the help with the 1st to 2nd and my often used 4th to 7th shift. Inexpensive easy mod.
Great ****, reduces shift stroke ~12% and makes 1st to 2nd and side control better.