When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
460 HP is not likely to have a perfect smooth idle, I am amazed the cars today with the power they have is amazing they idle as smooth as they do. I can tell from your comments you never had a high horsepower car from the 70's. They would idle at maybe 1000 rpms & shake the ground they were sitting. It is normal for it to have a little bump at idle. You need to sit a new Z06, they even have more of a idle bump.
Even at 460 HP they would idle smooth if not programmed otherwise. It's a design feature to give the illusion that it has a "lope" like a radical cam creates. Apparently GM decided that's what Corvette drivers like, but I could live without it as it always seems something is wrong to me!
460 HP is not likely to have a perfect smooth idle, I am amazed the cars today with the power they have is amazing they idle as smooth as they do. I can tell from your comments you never had a high horsepower car from the 70's. They would idle at maybe 1000 rpms & shake the ground they were sitting. It is normal for it to have a little bump at idle. You need to sit a new Z06, they even have more of a idle bump.
Actually, I've owned and restored a 1964 Chevelle SS, a 1966 Buick GS vert, a 1966 Buick GS hard top, and a 1972 Mercedes 300SEL 6.3. All ran smoother at idle than my 2017 GS. My 1996 C4 and 2007 C6 both feel smoother at idle than my 2017 C7 GS. A car this sophisticated and expensive I expected to be a bit smoother at idle. As a design feature, I get it, but it just kinda feels to me like it has a miss. I'm glad it's not.
My 306HP 3.5L V6 engine (87HP/L compared to the C7 at only 74HP/L) idles as smoothly as my Caiso wrist watch. I'm sure the variable valve timing helps, though.
Comes with 460 hp and keeping pollution low at idle! I'm surprised it's as good as it is! A Duntov cam in a 300 hp '50's/'60's small block Chevy was much loopier!
Actually, I've owned and restored a 1964 Chevelle SS, a 1966 Buick GS vert, a 1966 Buick GS hard top, and a 1972 Mercedes 300SEL 6.3. All ran smoother at idle than my 2017 GS. My 1996 C4 and 2007 C6 both feel smoother at idle than my 2017 C7 GS. A car this sophisticated and expensive I expected to be a bit smoother at idle. As a design feature, I get it, but it just kinda feels to me like it has a miss. I'm glad it's not.
The small block Chevy V8s with hydraulic lifters were quite docile at idle, and you likely recall that the more radical hotrodders back in the day installed a Duntov "30-30" cam (for the .030 inch valve lash on both intake and exhaust) with solid lifters that would barely idle below 1000 RPM, loped like a pony and sounded like a threshing machine...
In general most direct injected engines seem to have a little rougher idle than their port injected counterparts. Lexus uses combined port plus direct injection in some configurations and this provides a smooth idle for them. I haven't looked that closely at the new ZR-1 powerplant to see if its port injection is active at low RPM/low load conditions or if port injection is only used at higher load to supply the needed fuel but I expect GM will be using this combination on future luxury engines before the internal combustion engine comes to the end of the road.
The smoothest idling vehicle I currently own is a GMC Sierra pickup with a 6.6L turbo diesel and its idle is much smoother than the 3.6L DI in my Cadillac ATS and the LT-4 in my Z06.
I like a little lope in the idle of an American sports / muscle car. In my opinion, it's a distinctly American sound in the same way that a turbo whistle is to a Japanese car or a flat plane crank scream in an Italian car. It tells the driver and people nearby that this car has some power!