A Device Connected To The DLC (OBD II) Port
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
A Device Connected To The DLC (OBD II) Port
My 2017 owners manual...in the "Add-On Electrical Equipment" section says that an after market device such as a driver-behavior tracking device...aka...an OBD II module...connected to the DLC (Data Link Connector) port...may interfere with the vehicles systems. Before loosing my 2005 to the hurricane Harvey flooding...I used several different OBD II devices...one of which was the ELM bluetooth module for an Android app called Torque.
Wondering if anyone has had any problems using such a device plugged into the DLC (OBD II) port under the dash? Any first hand 2017 knowledge on the subject would be welcome.
(If this is something more oriented to the C7 techies...I'll remove this post)
Thanks,
Clint
Wondering if anyone has had any problems using such a device plugged into the DLC (OBD II) port under the dash? Any first hand 2017 knowledge on the subject would be welcome.
(If this is something more oriented to the C7 techies...I'll remove this post)
Thanks,
Clint
Last edited by billybaloneey; 10-19-2017 at 07:24 PM. Reason: want to add additional comment
#2
Le Mans Master
I do not have a 2017, but I will tell you that many folks have reported OnStar diag reports stop working with some OBD2 modules, like the Range AFM disabler for example. Many threads here regarding the Range and the many problems (limp home mode) on the '17 model year.
I have one of the BT Code Readers that I use with Torque, but I only plug that in when I need to read or clear a code. I doubt that it will cause any issues as it does not insert stuff on the GM Bus normally.
I also have a Window Valet and never an issue with that I suspect because it only inserts when the engine is off and the bus in not busy.
One suggestion is to unplug all such modules before bringing the car for service.
I have one of the BT Code Readers that I use with Torque, but I only plug that in when I need to read or clear a code. I doubt that it will cause any issues as it does not insert stuff on the GM Bus normally.
I also have a Window Valet and never an issue with that I suspect because it only inserts when the engine is off and the bus in not busy.
One suggestion is to unplug all such modules before bringing the car for service.
The following users liked this post:
billybaloneey (10-19-2017)
#3
Moderator/Tech Contributor
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Jacksonville Florida BWO Dayton, Cincinnati, Bloomsbury NJ, Cincinnati
Posts: 18,244
Received 3,822 Likes
on
2,066 Posts
2015 C7 of the Year Finalist
I have a mods4cars convertible Smarttop control plugged into my DLC and has been for at least 6 months. I get my monthly OnStar reports and I have seen no hint of an issue with the product. The Range thing is an entirely different animal and I read it tosses DTC codes.
That's all I got on this.
Elmer
That's all I got on this.
Elmer
#4
Burning Brakes
I saw this issue in my 2012 Mustang with Ford Health reports. Devices that simply read data on Canbus will be no problem. But devices like Range are actually inserting a data stream onto the Canbus can definitely cause anomalies.
#5
Safety Car
I have a mods4cars convertible Smarttop control plugged into my DLC and has been for at least 6 months. I get my monthly OnStar reports and I have seen no hint of an issue with the product. The Range thing is an entirely different animal and I read it tosses DTC codes.
That's all I got on this.
Elmer
That's all I got on this.
Elmer
#6
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,096
Received 8,930 Likes
on
5,334 Posts
The key word is may. Some devices are better designed and built than others. You are plugging it into a systems bus and it is expected to obey the bus electrical and software data link rules. If you plug in one and it screws up the bus some systems may not work properly. Same is true for all cars with a data link not just the C7.
Bill
Bill
Last edited by Bill Dearborn; 10-19-2017 at 08:41 PM.
#7
Racer
I've had the occasional quirk with mine. I, too, use Torque with a OBDII bluetooth adapter. It works most of the time, but I occasionally get weird issues like a hunting idle, or even warning messages on the dash (last time was something relating to the suspension).
It's probably not advisable to have something plugged in all the time.
It's probably not advisable to have something plugged in all the time.
#8
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2013
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 25,365
Received 7,753 Likes
on
4,182 Posts
CORVETTE TODAY Host
St. Jude Donor'15
I have a Window Caddy in my port full time-nothing has ever happened with my C7.
#9
Burning Brakes
I bought my 2014 in October of last year with 8400 miles on it, and opted for limited OnStar service, which I've had ever since. I have yet to receive a diagnostic report. Are the diagnostic reports mileage driven? I've only put 3,000 miles on the car since I bought it.
Additionally, for the past month, I've had a Range (V-8.2) plugged into my OBDII port all the time. I've noticed NO anomalies with the Range plugged in. The car is on a battery tender every night so I also have no fear of the Range draining the battery.
Additionally, for the past month, I've had a Range (V-8.2) plugged into my OBDII port all the time. I've noticed NO anomalies with the Range plugged in. The car is on a battery tender every night so I also have no fear of the Range draining the battery.
#10
Corvette Enthusiast
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,343
Received 922 Likes
on
614 Posts
Depends on what the devices are doing?
Are they reading CAN Bus Messages? Are they sending CAN Bus Messages? Are they trying to "spoof" existing CAN Messages (this can cause Message collisions). Are they even on the CAN Bus? Are they always powered (and therefore causing battery drain)?
Speaking of these devices, once every OEM implements full Cyber Security measures they will be worthless. Every OEM is isolating the internal CAN Bus from the OBD-II Connector, only leaving a "diagnostic" CAN Bus to the first module (either a Gateway or BCM) which then "transfers" the messages to the real CAN Bus. Since that device can typically only forward back and forth the diagnostic range spoofing modules will no longer be possible thru the OBD-II port. Mercedes and Chrysler already do this today with some limited success.
Expect the CAN bus to no longer be accessible to non-OEM approved products in the near future. Well not without tapping into it some other way, assuming the message you are spoofing doesn't have CAN security on it (that's coming too).
Are they reading CAN Bus Messages? Are they sending CAN Bus Messages? Are they trying to "spoof" existing CAN Messages (this can cause Message collisions). Are they even on the CAN Bus? Are they always powered (and therefore causing battery drain)?
Speaking of these devices, once every OEM implements full Cyber Security measures they will be worthless. Every OEM is isolating the internal CAN Bus from the OBD-II Connector, only leaving a "diagnostic" CAN Bus to the first module (either a Gateway or BCM) which then "transfers" the messages to the real CAN Bus. Since that device can typically only forward back and forth the diagnostic range spoofing modules will no longer be possible thru the OBD-II port. Mercedes and Chrysler already do this today with some limited success.
Expect the CAN bus to no longer be accessible to non-OEM approved products in the near future. Well not without tapping into it some other way, assuming the message you are spoofing doesn't have CAN security on it (that's coming too).
#11
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
Posts: 23,940
Received 2,051 Likes
on
1,362 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
I've recently started using the Valentine radar detector "Savvy" connector which plugs into the OBD port on our 2017. It provides switched power for the detector, and it reads the vehicle speed so the Valentine will mute any warnings when driving below a speed I set. Supposedly it isn't sending any information "into" the car, just looking at the speed output and taking a little electricity from the port.
My most recent OnStar diagnostic report said they couldn't do the diagnostics and maybe I had something aftermarket plugged in, like those devices provided by insurance companies. Yep, kinda.
I am not bothered that OnStar can't read the car, if that's the only issue.
Valentine's website says:
SAVVY draws a small current from the car battery even with the ignition switched off. Use caution in vehicles with weak batteries, or that go for long periods without being driven.
• OnStar® cannot run its full diagnostic test if SAVVY or any other device is plugged into the OBD port. SAVVY does not interfere with any other OnStar function.
• Click here for a list of cars with SAVVY compatibility issues. (Note: No GM vehicles or Corvette on that list, except electric vehicles)
With the understanding that these devices may cause other problems, I'd be interested in more reports from members about what they have plugged in and what is or isn't going wrong.
Does it help to periodically unplug the device, either to prevent problems or remove problems that crop up?
If problems come up, what are they and what do you do to fix them?
I think the Range AFM disabler is more intrusive, because it's telling the car to do something instead of just "listening", and that something is different from what the car normally does.
Further comments about your actual experiences are appreciated...
My most recent OnStar diagnostic report said they couldn't do the diagnostics and maybe I had something aftermarket plugged in, like those devices provided by insurance companies. Yep, kinda.
I am not bothered that OnStar can't read the car, if that's the only issue.
Valentine's website says:
SAVVY draws a small current from the car battery even with the ignition switched off. Use caution in vehicles with weak batteries, or that go for long periods without being driven.
• OnStar® cannot run its full diagnostic test if SAVVY or any other device is plugged into the OBD port. SAVVY does not interfere with any other OnStar function.
• Click here for a list of cars with SAVVY compatibility issues. (Note: No GM vehicles or Corvette on that list, except electric vehicles)
With the understanding that these devices may cause other problems, I'd be interested in more reports from members about what they have plugged in and what is or isn't going wrong.
Does it help to periodically unplug the device, either to prevent problems or remove problems that crop up?
If problems come up, what are they and what do you do to fix them?
I think the Range AFM disabler is more intrusive, because it's telling the car to do something instead of just "listening", and that something is different from what the car normally does.
Further comments about your actual experiences are appreciated...
Last edited by Gearhead Jim; 10-25-2017 at 10:20 PM.
#13
Moderator
Valentine's website says:
SAVVY draws a small current from the car battery even with the ignition switched off. Use caution in vehicles with weak batteries, or that go for long periods without being driven.
• OnStar® cannot run its full diagnostic test if SAVVY or any other device is plugged into the OBD port. SAVVY does not interfere with any other OnStar function.
• Click here for a list of cars with SAVVY compatibility issues. (Note: No GM vehicles or Corvette on that list, except electric vehicles)
SAVVY draws a small current from the car battery even with the ignition switched off. Use caution in vehicles with weak batteries, or that go for long periods without being driven.
• OnStar® cannot run its full diagnostic test if SAVVY or any other device is plugged into the OBD port. SAVVY does not interfere with any other OnStar function.
• Click here for a list of cars with SAVVY compatibility issues. (Note: No GM vehicles or Corvette on that list, except electric vehicles)
#14
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
Posts: 23,940
Received 2,051 Likes
on
1,362 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
Well, I'd rather have them be too cautious with their warnings than too confident.
#15
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Nov 2015
Location: Lake Havasu City Arizona
Posts: 7,327
Received 3,439 Likes
on
2,059 Posts
I have that Torque app with my bluetooth diagnostics and no problems. You will notice they use the verbage "may" cause problems.
#16
Race Director
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Bonneville Salt Flats, 223mph Aug. '04
Posts: 17,439
Received 5,218 Likes
on
3,459 Posts
No loss with missing OnStar reports, in my opinion, if that's all you lose.