When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
With rev match I used to always run down the gears when slowing or coming to a stop. Lately I’ve been going to neutral and using the brake. I still downshift for sharp curves but I’m wondering what most forum members do?
Not sure how true it is anymore but it was said "A engine used for braking will break". Not so sure if that applies anymore. That article was written by sportbike coach Keith Code.
I would think the potential to break an engine on downshift would depend on the driver - in that if the downshift occurs at an RPM range that is too high, and the engine redlines in the lower gear, and you do that too many times, then yes, you can break the engine. Or perhaps another error, like popping the clutch after the downshift, instead of a smooth release...
In normal driving, even at interstate speed, our cars turn what, maybe 2000rpm?
What’s the redline speed for each gear?
Unless you are cruising at 65 in 2nd gear, any single gear downshift is not going to bring the car anywhere near redline.
For them matter, most cases, even a 2 gear downshift isn’t going to approach 6500rpm.
Miss the shift or pop the clutch, yea, that might cause a problem
But that would be driver error.
To the OPs question, I engine brake regularly.
But I don’t go to neutral until the car has stopped. And because most of my driving is in traffic, I don’t use rev matching very often.
35 years driving a clutch, and have not broken an engine, trans, or clutch (yet.)
I rev match and downshift to have the engine operating at the proper RPM if I need to add power to avoid a situation that develops unexpectedly. Having the transmission in neutral, 3rd or 4th gear decelerating below 20 mph removes instantaneous acceleration as an option.
Car in neutral, foot off the clutch (I'm OCD about the throw-out bearing), brake to a stop. If I suddenly need acceleration, drop it into 2nd and there's plenty of power. I rarely need to stop from a significant speed. It's usually a string of stop lights where you never get out of second anyway.
For normal driving use the normal level of engine braking that occurs with the engine in gear but don't shift into much lower gears at higher speed unless you really need engine braking (as in descending a steep mountain grade) or expect to use sudden acceleration as noted by a previous poster.
Probably the #1 "danger" for someone used to driving an automatic but using their auto in manual mode is forgetting to downshift when maximum acceleration is needed in an emergency situation.
For normal braking I agree that brakes are cheaper than using the engine as a substitute for friction brakes but on the other hand I wouldn't shift into neutral forcing the friction brakes to also accept the load that would have been normally born via some engine braking.
Been downshifting to slow car down without an issue for the last 35 yrs as I only drive sticks and never had a clutch or engine issue. I always thought that was one of the advantages of a stick- less brake wear.
If downshifting to make a turn, even in town going from ~45 mph in 5th to 3rd for the turn, use both. Downshift and brake prior to the turn, then ready to accelerate after turning.
In everyday driving, downshifting to slow down is unnecessarily wearing out all the expensive parts. Brakes pads are cheap and easy to replace. And getting hard on the brakes once in a while is good for them.
If downshifting to make a turn, even in town going from ~45 mph in 5th to 3rd for the turn, use both. Downshift and brake prior to the turn, then ready to accelerate after turning.
If coming to a light, just brakes.
I do this also.
Why put wear on the clutch to slow down. Brakes are cheaper.
The only time I've EVER "coasted" to a stop in neutral was when the parachute failed at Bonneville! NEVER on the street. There I'm always in the appropriate gear for the next anticipated action.
Hardly ever use rev match. I use both my trans and brakes to come to a stop. There's no harm as long as you remember to give it a little gas when you downshift and don't do something stupid like downshifting from 5th to 2nd.
In 46 yrs of driving a stick, I only went through 1 clutch and that was on a Datsun 310 that I beat the crap out of, and that was after 65000 miles of NYC driving.
Rev match is decent when passing at high speeds.
Engine braking is perfectly fine for these cars. The engine, drive train, and brakes in the C7 are very stout and can handle this with ease. I typically downshift to 3rd and use that gear until the speeds drop to around 15 mph then Neutral and brake until a complete stop.
Not sure how true it is anymore but it was said "A engine used for braking will break". Not so sure if that applies anymore. That article was written by sportbike coach Keith Code.
For as long as I have been driving, 39 years, I down shift to slow car when coming to a stop. I do the same with my motorcycles. Never had an issue with the engine or clutch doing this.
Originally Posted by juanvaldez
Engines are for accelerating, brakes are for decelerating.
Have you ever driven out west or in the mountains? Signs tell you to down shift to low gear to save your brakes. I down shift in my manual cars, trucks and bikes to slow.
Originally Posted by Corgidog1
Been downshifting to slow car down without an issue for the last 35 yrs as I only drive sticks and never had a clutch or engine issue. I always thought that was one of the advantages of a stick- less brake wear.
Plus it ensures your in the proper gear should you need to accelerate rather than trying to find the correct gear.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.