C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Valves are pretty clean

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2019, 05:48 PM
  #1  
Dcasole
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
Dcasole's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 7,879
Received 2,245 Likes on 1,637 Posts
Default Valves are pretty clean

While installing my ported intake manifold I wanted to be sure I checked all the valves to see if they were getting gummed up with oil because if they were I was buying a catch can

They all looked pretty clean and there was hardly any oil in the intake manifold either . The "white " you are seeing is the light from my LED flashlight reflecting back


Dave


Last edited by Dcasole; 03-17-2019 at 06:04 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Dcasole:
mammoth713 (03-20-2019), Rebel Yell (03-18-2019)
Old 03-17-2019, 05:57 PM
  #2  
owc6
Team Owner
 
owc6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Posts: 24,550
Received 4,186 Likes on 2,679 Posts

Default

Good to see!

How many miles?
Old 03-17-2019, 06:01 PM
  #3  
Dcasole
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
Dcasole's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 7,879
Received 2,245 Likes on 1,637 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by owc6
Good to see!

How many miles?
Around 10,000 , this is my new motor that they installed after I dropped the valve . I was really anxious to see if I needed to go out and buy a catch can but after seeing this ... it can wait a few thousand more miles

Inside the old manifold was hardly any trace of oil ....

Dave
Old 03-17-2019, 09:16 PM
  #4  
PatternDayTrader
Race Director
 
PatternDayTrader's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Lansing MI
Posts: 17,982
Received 1,056 Likes on 769 Posts

Default

Yeah looks good.
Old 03-17-2019, 09:22 PM
  #5  
Kingtal0n
Melting Slicks
 
Kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,247
Received 723 Likes on 497 Posts

Default

right, catch cans are only for engines with oil induction issues. Either because the pcv system has failed somehow, or was installed incorrectly, or was engineered poorly, etc..



A healthy motor with proper pcv should never use a catch can. Even if just to keep others from thinking there was something wrong with it... (I Would never run one visibly because I know what they are for and it isn't something I want others to know about) i.e. its a hygiene issue for the engine and the motor is embarrassed about the problem
Old 03-18-2019, 09:00 AM
  #6  
subieworx
Pro
 
subieworx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2016
Posts: 624
Received 130 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kingtal0n
right, catch cans are only for engines with oil induction issues. Either because the pcv system has failed somehow, or was installed incorrectly, or was engineered poorly, etc..



A healthy motor with proper pcv should never use a catch can. Even if just to keep others from thinking there was something wrong with it... (I Would never run one visibly because I know what they are for and it isn't something I want others to know about) i.e. its a hygiene issue for the engine and the motor is embarrassed about the problem
A properly operating PCV system will still allow ingestion of oil into the intake tract from the crank case. I would argue the exact opposite point and say that all engines should have some kind of Air oil separator to keep these oily vapors from entering the engine. The system I use collects on average 6oz of oil from the PCV line per 5000 miles. I wouldn't want that going back into the engine at all as it would only serve to dilute the quality of the fuel can get stuck to the valves.

That being said these engines due better than some other engines in terms of accumulation of crap on the valves over time. I removed my intake at 33000 miles and had so little gunk on them I didn't bother cleaning them.

Last edited by subieworx; 03-18-2019 at 12:26 PM.
The following users liked this post:
USCG (03-18-2019)
Old 03-18-2019, 11:16 AM
  #7  
Dcasole
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
Dcasole's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 7,879
Received 2,245 Likes on 1,637 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by subieworx
A properly operating PCV system will still allow ingestion of oil into the intake tract from the crank case. I would argue the exact opposite point and say that all engines should have some kind of Air oil separator to keep these oily vapors from entering the engine. The system I use collects on average 6oz of oil from the PCV line per 5000 miles. I wouldn't want that going back into the engine at all as it would oil serve to dilute the quality of the fuel can get stuck to the
I agree , i think all motors are going to have some oil vapor blow by , that's the main reason for a PVC system on all engines . I am going to install a catch can because I to want to pull my manifold at 30,000 and see the same thing as I see today. Without the benefit of the gas washing over the valves to clean them I am sure that having a catch can on a DI motor is important

Dave
The following users liked this post:
JerryU (03-18-2019)
Old 03-18-2019, 11:20 AM
  #8  
RapidC84B
Team Owner
 
RapidC84B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2013
Posts: 20,222
Received 13,170 Likes on 5,991 Posts

Default

While I'm not running a catch can on my C7, I wouldn't call 10K miles enough use to really evaluate. I have 57K on my car now. There are folks with nearly 200K on these motors and nobody has mentioned needing a decarb procedure like some of the German cars need.
Old 03-18-2019, 11:21 AM
  #9  
REDBULLIT
Instructor
 
REDBULLIT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2015
Location: FL
Posts: 238
Received 46 Likes on 23 Posts
Default


they look cleaner thn mine at 6k with oil separator.
Old 03-18-2019, 11:34 AM
  #10  
Dcasole
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
Dcasole's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 7,879
Received 2,245 Likes on 1,637 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tool Hoarder
While I'm not running a catch can on my C7, I wouldn't call 10K miles enough use to really evaluate. I have 57K on my car now. There are folks with nearly 200K on these motors and nobody has mentioned needing a decarb procedure like some of the German cars need.
Tool Hoarder ... I get it .. not the reason for my post , the reason is I read all the horror stories and was worried what I would find ...which I was pleasantly surprised , which leads me to believe that I will buy a catch can but I will not be in a rush to get it as my motor is running clean

Dave
Old 03-18-2019, 12:14 PM
  #11  
Patman
Race Director
 
Patman's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 15,072
Received 1,920 Likes on 1,192 Posts

Default

I wish we would see more pictures like this, a lot of other car forums (for other makes with direct injection) have tons of posts with pictures of their intake valves (and most of them look pretty horrendous, check out a Subaru WRX forum for instance) I'm pretty confident that the LT1 doesn't suffer from any problems with excessive carbon buildup on the backs of the intake valves, but seeing more pictures would still be nice (I'd love to see the intake valves on an LT1 with over 100k and no catch can for instance)
The following users liked this post:
Dcasole (03-18-2019)
Old 03-18-2019, 12:28 PM
  #12  
subieworx
Pro
 
subieworx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2016
Posts: 624
Received 130 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

The BMW N54 engine is the worst I have ever seen. It has to be cleaned every 30-40k miles.

The 15+ wrx is pretty bad as well.
Old 03-18-2019, 01:25 PM
  #13  
RapidC84B
Team Owner
 
RapidC84B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2013
Posts: 20,222
Received 13,170 Likes on 5,991 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Patman
I wish we would see more pictures like this, a lot of other car forums (for other makes with direct injection) have tons of posts with pictures of their intake valves (and most of them look pretty horrendous, check out a Subaru WRX forum for instance) I'm pretty confident that the LT1 doesn't suffer from any problems with excessive carbon buildup on the backs of the intake valves, but seeing more pictures would still be nice (I'd love to see the intake valves on an LT1 with over 100k and no catch can for instance)
When the LT1 came out GM stated it had one of the most extensive oil vapor separators ever mass produced. The valve covers have all those lumps on them for a reason. I have never removed one, but apparently the underside has a very extensive chamber system to remove oil vapor from the crank gasses. I had catch cans on all my C5s. I do not choose to run one on my C7 and have 57K miles on it now with track use 4-5X a year. No issues as of yet.
Old 03-18-2019, 01:40 PM
  #14  
subieworx
Pro
 
subieworx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2016
Posts: 624
Received 130 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

How would you know if you had an issue or not?

All LS/T valve covers have had separators built into them. The problem is that is not where most of the oil comes from that gets into the intake. It comes from the PCV.
The following users liked this post:
Dcasole (03-18-2019)
Old 03-18-2019, 01:56 PM
  #15  
RapidC84B
Team Owner
 
RapidC84B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2013
Posts: 20,222
Received 13,170 Likes on 5,991 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by subieworx
How would you know if you had an issue or not?

All LS/T valve covers have had separators built into them. The problem is that is not where most of the oil comes from that gets into the intake. It comes from the PCV.
No LS had separators like the LT has. I owned 4 C5s with one being a full road-race car. I'm familiar with the LS systems. The "PCV" is a system consisting of the valley cover (also with an oil/air separator) and the valve covers. It allows crank vapors to leave the motor and be re-ingested and burnt up while letting fresh air flow in. It's not the valve covers and then "the PCV".

You'd know if the car started to run poorly or was down on power from reduced airflow.
Old 03-18-2019, 02:00 PM
  #16  
robert miller
Team Owner
 
robert miller's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,846
Received 1,762 Likes on 1,529 Posts

Default ttt

Originally Posted by REDBULLIT


they look cleaner thn mine at 6k with oil separator.
yes with only 6,k miles your set up may be really bad for performance wise after 30,k miles for sure. That stuff starts getting on the valves & your hp will drop for sure... Robert
Old 03-18-2019, 03:10 PM
  #17  
jones238
Intermediate
 
jones238's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2017
Location: St Petersburg Florida
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default Icky Valves

NICE!!! Thanks for the info and pics
The following users liked this post:
Dcasole (03-18-2019)

Get notified of new replies

To Valves are pretty clean

Old 03-18-2019, 03:12 PM
  #18  
subieworx
Pro
 
subieworx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2016
Posts: 624
Received 130 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tool Hoarder
No LS had separators like the LT has. I owned 4 C5s with one being a full road-race car. I'm familiar with the LS systems. The "PCV" is a system consisting of the valley cover (also with an oil/air separator) and the valve covers. It allows crank vapors to leave the motor and be re-ingested and burnt up while letting fresh air flow in. It's not the valve covers and then "the PCV".

You'd know if the car started to run poorly or was down on power from reduced airflow.
I didn't say they were the same, just that they had baffles in the valve covers and always have. And that most of the oil that gets sucked up into the intake comes from the valley cover/PCV not the valve covers. I have done quite a lot of endurance road racing with LS engines and am very familiar with how much oil they can suck up out of the crackcase and what ports it comes from.

The point is to take care of the problem before the effects are noticed not to wait until there is a problem. Keep it clean now and keep the oil out of the combustion process and the car will run better for longer with fewer issues.
Old 03-18-2019, 03:17 PM
  #19  
RapidC84B
Team Owner
 
RapidC84B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2013
Posts: 20,222
Received 13,170 Likes on 5,991 Posts

Default

The baffles on the LT engines are far more elaborate than on any LS engine. That was my point.
Old 03-18-2019, 03:21 PM
  #20  
cv67
Team Owner
 
cv67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes on 2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05

Default

Originally Posted by Dcasole
Around 10,000 , this is my new motor that they installed after I dropped the valve . I was really anxious to see if I needed to go out and buy a catch can but after seeing this ... it can wait a few thousand more miles

Inside the old manifold was hardly any trace of oil ....

Dave
It will probably never need one, lots of monkey see monkey do with that product.


Quick Reply: Valves are pretty clean



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 PM.