Soler Performance – C7 Upgrades
Sounds like you nailed the install too — clean and hidden setups are always a win. If you ever need anything down the road or have questions about future upgrades, don’t hesitate to reach out.
Appreciate your support!
– Tiffany
The 91mm is best for stock to lightly modified vehicles—think CAI and some exhaust work. The 95mm is recommended for heavier modifications like a full bolt-on setup (built exhaust, CAI, upgraded manifold, headers, etc.). The 95mm will require an adapter if your manifold isn’t ported to at least 93mm.
You don’t have to tune or retune with our 91mm or 95mm, though it’s recommended if you want to make sure you’re getting the full potential out of the throttle body—it’s really a personal preference.
You can use code TIFF5OFF for a discount, and let us know if you need any help choosing the right setup.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Don't forget to use tiff5off at checkout to save on your order!
Don't forget to use tiff5off at checkout to save on your order!
Soler Performance DLX Throttle Controller Installation
The discount code tiff5off never expires, so when your wife is ready to order one for her 2013 GS, she can use it too.
* Must have aftermarket inlet duct/CAI or expandable coupler.
I am running a stock setup and do not plan to mod the car, can you point me in the right direction for a coupler?
In it, he explains airflow and shaft design, how air moves through our throttle body, and how design choices impact airflow.
You might be able to stretch the stock CAI coupler over the 95mm throttle body, but it would be very difficult to do so. If you don’t plan to modify your vehicle and want to keep it stock or lightly modded, we recommend the 91mm throttle body, which is perfect for stock to lightly modified setups. We typically recommend the 95mm throttle body for full bolt-on (FBO) vehicles.
Fluid Dynamic / Aerodynamic studies have these pretty well documented in countless test, textbooks, scientific journals and studies across a variety of industries / applications. "flow/laminar separation", "wake", "bluff object", etc...
Cheers!
The very first thing (gut feeling) that caught our attention about making TB's more efficient was the stream lining of these features you are talking about, and so we did, only to realize that no matter what you do to those areas (lip/ridge/...) did not affect the WOT flow. The WOT flow is 970+/-10 CFM no matter how well you round or streamline that lip/ridge or anything on the wall for that matter.
Why? B/c we are dealing with Mach numbers from ~0.1 at WOT to 1 when idling, there's no throttle position at which we get anything close to laminar flow, the minimum Reynolds number for the LT1/LT2 is nearly 250, 000, that is almost 10 times greater than what it needs to be to be considered transitional, let alone laminar. The consequences of that are:
1) Very turbulent flow at any throttle position, which is made even worse by the fact that the air comes from a bend in the upstream duct swirling in opposite directions. and that the throttle body is S-shaped (not a straight bore).
2) Unstable boundary layer, the TB is so short that the boundary layer never gets to develop or stabilize.
3) What matters is Area, area, and more area.
At this point we are convinced (against our gut) that every penny we spend on streamlining the wall is not going to pay off (at least in practice), but we know that customers can have the same gut feeling we had, and we still smooth and polish them out anyway, but we know it is a myth at this point.
Now the notch at 12 o'clock. What's the most effective and controllable way to get more flow area at low throttle? We could remove some of that ridge along the perimeter times a radial small gap distance; or we can have a slot of limited width for which we have better control of the larger radial gap. The latter is best as you can probably guess. The sharp corners it creates are parallel to the flow direction, yet we still smooth them out. But even if they were perpendicular to the flow and sharp, they would not matter.
Does that make sense?
Soler Performance LLC
support@solerengineering.com
www.solerengineering.com
(251) 468-9786

















