When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Anyone have any experience with the Range AFM disabler?
How does it work?
Any issues with warning liters, glitches etc.?
I'm interested too. $200 is an expensive "option"!
My concern is that they mention some glitches and codes may show up. I emailed them and it sounds like they are still gathering data to provide a fix if it is needed. If it guaranteed no codes, I'd probably go for it. It would be nice if there was a switch on it so it could easily be turned on (No AFM) or off (AFM) without removing the module.
I like the AFM except when it impacts the NPP sound which is way to often on an automatic.
I'm interested too. $200 is an expensive "option"!
My concern is that they mention some glitches and codes may show up. I emailed them and it sounds like they are still gathering data to provide a fix if it is needed. If it guaranteed no codes, I'd probably go for it. It would be nice if there was a switch on it so it could easily be turned on (No AFM) or off (AFM) without removing the module.
I like the AFM except when it impacts the NPP sound which is way to often on an automatic.
Ed
I agree. I have read about long term engine reliability also. The idea of AFM makes me nervous.
I will operate my new C7 for a month or two 100% factory stock and see how I like/feel about the AFM. Then hopefully by the time I need to make a decision we'll have more real world usage info.
I know Camaro and GM pick up owners have been using this accessory for sometime now. Those forums could be a good place to start asking questions.
active fuel management has been around a long time under the name "displacement on demand."
you have a 100000 mile warranty. why on earth would you be nervous? just drive the car and if you want to modify it, do it right but understand there will be warranty implications. if you don't want to modify it and don't like something about it so much that it makes you unhappy, sell the damn car and buy something else.
I'm interested too. $200 is an expensive "option"!
My concern is that they mention some glitches and codes may show up. I emailed them and it sounds like they are still gathering data to provide a fix if it is needed. If it guaranteed no codes, I'd probably go for it. It would be nice if there was a switch on it so it could easily be turned on (No AFM) or off (AFM) without removing the module.
I like the AFM except when it impacts the NPP sound which is way to often on an automatic.
Ed
My feelings exactly. I too read about some cars throwing codes, and have some concern about that. I wish the A6 cars only had AFM active in "E"co mode like the M7's.
S.
active fuel management has been around a long time under the name "displacement on demand."
you have a 100000 mile warranty. why on earth would you be nervous? just drive the car and if you want to modify it, do it right but understand there will be warranty implications. if you don't want to modify it and don't like something about it so much that it makes you unhappy, sell the damn car and buy something else.
It's just a conversation. I have not even taken delivery yet. I am prompting this conversation because, when you search AFM on the internet, there are negative articles out there.
My feelings exactly. I too read about some cars throwing codes, and have some concern about that. I wish the A6 cars only had AFM active in "E"co mode like the M7's.
S.
I have one on my 2012 Silverado. Some ( a small percentage) of AFM vehicle owners are having fuel consumption issues. On the Silverados if/when the oil consumption is over there threshold they are replacing rings. Personally I DO NOT like AFM and wish I could disable it without warrantee concerns. The unit just plugs into the OBD port and is easily removed and installed and leaves no traces like a tune. I got mine for $149 on sale through a forum where autoanything was doing a 20% off special.
There may be issues with the one for the vette but I would not hesitate to use one based on my experience. Also on my Silverado I have a 6 speed auto transmission that when place in M5 does not go into V4 mode. So before the Range device I would have to drive in M5 on the highway or allow AFM to kick in.
If the range thing worked I'd spend the 200. My cars sounds like crap, almost like a header leak, if you give it just enough throttle in V4 at a certain speed/RPM with the roof off or windows open it sounds pretty bad. Once V8 kicks back in the noise stops.
I tried two other auto c7s and they both did the same thing, dont think its really hurting anything but it sounds like poo. I'm sure you can get a manual car to do it too but since 99.9% of people with a manual dont drive with it in ECO mode I doubt they notice.
Can't you guys just turn it off in the tune like everybody else can? Why does everybody want to add all these things to trick the car into not doing things (CAGS bypass, AFM bypass, etc) when there are options in the tune to do it, often for less money?
Can't you guys just turn it off in the tune like everybody else can? Why does everybody want to add all these things to trick the car into not doing things (CAGS bypass, AFM bypass, etc) when there are options in the tune to do it, often for less money?
I imagine hacking the AFM wouldn't go over well on a warranty claim either
lots of people feel plugging in a device and then removing it for service is safer and different from actually doing it right and modifying the ECM programming. it's less scary.
we really don't know what gm can or can't see if they are looking. if afm fails or a device sets a code, just because it gets removed doesn't make the car work properly or the code go away. even if the cel goes back off the code stays logged.
products of dubious value have been available since money dick was a minnow.
lots of people feel plugging in a device and then removing it for service is safer and different from actually doing it right and modifying the ECM programming. it's less scary.
we really don't know what gm can or can't see if they are looking. if afm fails or a device sets a code, just because it gets removed doesn't make the car work properly or the code go away. even if the cel goes back off the code stays logged.
products of dubious value have been available since money dick was a minnow.
Exactly
Plus, I think a tune altering ONLY the AFM or CAGS programming wouldn't even be noticed at all, since that stuff is not something that typically gets checked for when GM is investigating warranty claims in the first place
Plus, I think a tune altering ONLY the AFM or CAGS programming wouldn't even be noticed at all, since that stuff is not something that typically gets checked for when GM is investigating warranty claims in the first place
to be fair, a real tune/flash trips the counter even if all you change is one thing, even tire size. the only one that appears to not trip the traditional counter is the diablotune handheld device but that's not the best option, good for most people near stock, but not the best, and if you make any mods past a cai to your car, you need a real tune and your counter will be clicked.
to be fair, a real tune/flash trips the counter even if all you change is one thing, even tire size. the only one that appears to not trip the traditional counter is the diablotune handheld device but that's not the best option, good for most people near stock, but not the best, and if you make any mods past a cai to your car, you need a real tune and your counter will be clicked.
Uhh...bingo. For some people who want to retain their warranty with no-questions-asked, putting a tune on the car to eliminate AFM isn't exactly a wise thing to do.
I think you'd have a helluva' lot better chance of explaining away an "unknown accessory" plugged into the OBD port than why the ECM has been flashed.
S.