Deleting the secondary cats question
#21
Corvette Enthusiast
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,343
Received 922 Likes
on
614 Posts
Are those actually cats or are they just resonators?
I call anything past the O2 sensor a resonator. With resonators that are near the exhaust tips, I use the word muffler. But in reality they are very similar in construction. They are there mostly to kill noise, not capture pollutants.
I call anything past the O2 sensor a resonator. With resonators that are near the exhaust tips, I use the word muffler. But in reality they are very similar in construction. They are there mostly to kill noise, not capture pollutants.
#22
Are those actually cats or are they just resonators?
I call anything past the O2 sensor a resonator. With resonators that are near the exhaust tips, I use the word muffler. But in reality they are very similar in construction. They are there mostly to kill noise, not capture pollutants.
I call anything past the O2 sensor a resonator. With resonators that are near the exhaust tips, I use the word muffler. But in reality they are very similar in construction. They are there mostly to kill noise, not capture pollutants.
The following users liked this post:
LT1 Z51 (02-14-2018)
#23
Borla Exhaust
I did the same thing, Bought X Pipe from Borla and then the Atak system around 2 grand
And was disappointed . What a shame took them off put stocks back on and much happier.
Very disappointed with the Borla Atak set up
Sounded better but what a waist. Very disappointed with wasting money for bad results
I did the same thing, Bought X Pipe from Borla and then the Atak system around 2 grand
And was disappointed . What a shame took them off put stocks back on and much happier.
Very disappointed with the Borla Atak set up
Sounded better but what a waist. Very disappointed with wasting money for bad results
#24
E-Ray, 3LZ, ZER, LIFT
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: NE South Carolina
Posts: 29,503
Received 9,626 Likes
on
6,630 Posts
Was looking at getting a x pipe and new mufflers. But the OEM x pipe flows good enough. the only reason i see the need for one is to remove the secondaries. Just to complement the after market mufflers. (sound)
I would rather save the money and just cut and weld pipe where the cats once where. I nor does anyone on the street care about what my car looks like underneath. So putting that aside.
It doesn't look like much room to cut on the one side. Can this be done ?
I would rather save the money and just cut and weld pipe where the cats once where. I nor does anyone on the street care about what my car looks like underneath. So putting that aside.
It doesn't look like much room to cut on the one side. Can this be done ?
OEM Pipes and crossover are better than some of the kits!
Last edited by JerryU; 02-14-2018 at 09:41 AM.
#25
Safety Car
Are those actually cats or are they just resonators?
I call anything past the O2 sensor a resonator. With resonators that are near the exhaust tips, I use the word muffler. But in reality they are very similar in construction. They are there mostly to kill noise, not capture pollutants.
I call anything past the O2 sensor a resonator. With resonators that are near the exhaust tips, I use the word muffler. But in reality they are very similar in construction. They are there mostly to kill noise, not capture pollutants.
#26
car is way louder with the secondary Cats.resonators removed, it was quite with them on the car, put on the Borla Attack mufflers with NPP first, didnt notice much of a differance in sound, then added on the Borla 60547 X pipe that eliminated the factory X pipe, and car is way louder. the dealer called them Resonators, some call them Cats, Either way, car lost torq with the new X pipe and mufflers.
Last edited by mark mc williams; 02-14-2018 at 01:18 PM.
#27
Team Owner
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,846
Received 1,762 Likes
on
1,529 Posts
car is way louder with the secondary Cats.resonators removed, it was quite with them on the car, put on the Borla Attack mufflers with NPP first, didnt notice much of a differance in sound, then added on the Borla 60547 X pipe that eliminated the factory X pipe, and car is way louder. the dealer called them Resonators, some call them Cats, Either way, car lost torq with the new X pipe and mufflers.
#28
i dint want to loose my factory warranty , cant re tune it,, but i will put my factory X pipe back on.
#29
Safety Car
The cars today are very sensitive to any changes. Removing secondary cats or even gutting them requires tuning the ECU to return the low end torque.
The following users liked this post:
zeprulz (02-21-2018)
#30
I would agree with that. If you are unwilling to tune the car, then you(everyone) should leave the car completely stock except for an axle back exhaust.
The cars today are very sensitive to any changes. Removing secondary cats or even gutting them requires tuning the ECU to return the low end torque.
The cars today are very sensitive to any changes. Removing secondary cats or even gutting them requires tuning the ECU to return the low end torque.
#31
Safety Car
Have thought the same thing! The OEM pipes with NPP are large and Vettes' have had crossovers for years.! The approach shown in the pic below would be even easier! If you had a small welder could do it as a DIY. Cut a large section from the topside of the CATS with a cut-off wheel (so inspection would not see it) then remove the internals and weld the cut top section back! Might even be able to sell the platinum etc to a scrape yard!!
OEM Pipes and crossover are better than some of the kits!
OEM Pipes and crossover are better than some of the kits!
PS: I think the factory X-pipe is about as good as an X-pipe can get.
Last edited by C7/Z06 Man; 02-14-2018 at 10:00 PM.
The following users liked this post:
bick333 (04-04-2021)
#32
Corvette Enthusiast
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,343
Received 922 Likes
on
614 Posts
So how is it keeping emissions compliance? The PCM/ECM needs to be aware of anything emissions related. This requires a closed-looped system.
Those devices are not within the closed loop, therefore they cannot LEGALLY be part of the emissions system.
Last edited by LT1 Z51; 02-14-2018 at 04:53 PM.
#33
Drifting
If I was going to do the above modification I would insert & tackweld in a piece of tubing of the proper dimensions for a smoother flow through the empty cats. Due to the exhaust 'not' really escaping to the outside atmosphere I don't think if would be a 'big deal' if the tubing is tacked in place.
PS: I think the factory X-pipe is about as good as an X-pipe can get.
PS: I think the factory X-pipe is about as good as an X-pipe can get.
The following 2 users liked this post by bigsapper:
bick333 (04-04-2021),
C7/Z06 Man (02-14-2018)
#34
Safety Car
Yes, also Borla needs to re evaluate there X pipe and mufflers for the New C7 z06's and mention Re Tune will be needed, or you loose bottom end TorQ. Borla told Me They dyno tested the pipes in 2015 only. very disapointed with loss of bottom end Torq now.on my 2017 C7 Z06.
If you get the Xpipe that retains the secondary cats then there is zero issue and you do not lose low end torque.
#35
Safety Car
There is no emissions checking device after the O2 Sensors.
So how is it keeping emissions compliance? The PCM/ECM needs to be aware of anything emissions related. This requires a closed-looped system.
Those devices are not within the closed loop, therefore they cannot LEGALLY be part of the emissions system.
So how is it keeping emissions compliance? The PCM/ECM needs to be aware of anything emissions related. This requires a closed-looped system.
Those devices are not within the closed loop, therefore they cannot LEGALLY be part of the emissions system.
#36
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: Northville Michigan
Posts: 3,074
Received 1,195 Likes
on
663 Posts
C7 of the Year - Unmodified Finalist 2021
Question: A stock C7 Grand Sport, if you add only Borla X-Pipe, remove secondary cats, What do you get besides a little louder/throatie/aggressive sound? Do you also loose low end torq?
If you have an AFE and are just adding Borla X-Pipe and moving secondary cats, should you just leave it stock x-pipe?
If you have an AFE and are just adding Borla X-Pipe and moving secondary cats, should you just leave it stock x-pipe?
#37
Corvette Enthusiast
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,343
Received 922 Likes
on
614 Posts
Care to provide proof? Based on what I know about emissions and FMVSS I don't see anything that agrees with you.
You've provided nothing to prove your point just telling us we are wrong. As the person making the DEFINITIVE claim, it is up to you to show proof.
Being that I said it's not a part of the closed look system (if it is, please explain how), and that legally the ECM/PCM has to know about all emissions (if it doesn't how can a simple OBD read pass an emissions test?) So far, nothing I've said is incorrect other than the argument over if it is a cat. I ask again (for a third time in this post). PROVE IT.
You've provided nothing to prove your point just telling us we are wrong. As the person making the DEFINITIVE claim, it is up to you to show proof.
Being that I said it's not a part of the closed look system (if it is, please explain how), and that legally the ECM/PCM has to know about all emissions (if it doesn't how can a simple OBD read pass an emissions test?) So far, nothing I've said is incorrect other than the argument over if it is a cat. I ask again (for a third time in this post). PROVE IT.
Last edited by LT1 Z51; 02-15-2018 at 12:57 PM.
#38
Safety Car
Care to provide proof? Based on what I know about emissions and FMVSS I don't see anything that agrees with you.
You've provided nothing to prove your point just telling us we are wrong. As the person making the DEFINITIVE claim, it is up to you to show proof.
Being that I said it's not a part of the closed look system (if it is, please explain how), and that legally the ECM/PCM has to know about all emissions (if it doesn't how can a simple OBD read pass an emissions test?) So far, nothing I've said is incorrect other than the argument over if it is a cat. I ask again (for a third time in this post). PROVE IT.
You've provided nothing to prove your point just telling us we are wrong. As the person making the DEFINITIVE claim, it is up to you to show proof.
Being that I said it's not a part of the closed look system (if it is, please explain how), and that legally the ECM/PCM has to know about all emissions (if it doesn't how can a simple OBD read pass an emissions test?) So far, nothing I've said is incorrect other than the argument over if it is a cat. I ask again (for a third time in this post). PROVE IT.
Last edited by Internets_Ninja; 02-15-2018 at 05:20 PM.
#39
Safety Car
Question: A stock C7 Grand Sport, if you add only Borla X-Pipe, remove secondary cats, What do you get besides a little louder/throatie/aggressive sound? Do you also loose low end torq?
If you have an AFE and are just adding Borla X-Pipe and moving secondary cats, should you just leave it stock x-pipe?
If you have an AFE and are just adding Borla X-Pipe and moving secondary cats, should you just leave it stock x-pipe?
If you add an AFE intake you will pick up some power due to the air fuel ratio leaning out. However, untuned you can lose efficiency and your MPG can drop a little. Also the AFE has no affect on the false knock from the secondary cat delete. So you will still run into this issue. But if you do both mods at the same time if may be less noticeable.
Which brings me back to the point that unless you plan to tune your car, I subjectively feel like any mods is a waste of time. Adding an AFE intake without a tune may get you a little bit of power but not enough to feel a difference. The car is going to change its long term fuel trims and eventually the gains are maybe 10hp, and fuel mileage will drop a little. If you do xpipe, catback, and AFE WITH a tune, you could potentially pick up 20 rwhp. If you want to keep MPG and drive ability like stock and you are willign to tune your ECU, I would recommend an Intake like AFE, a ported throttle body, ported intake manifold, Borla Xpipe with 2nd cat delete, and(optional) borla/cosra axle back. Anything short of this and you cannot feel the additional power regardless of what the forums say. (With exception to Z06's and aftermarket intakes. This is enough of a gain that you can feel)
Hope this makes sense.
Thanks
The following users liked this post:
KGrant (02-15-2018)
#40
Corvette Enthusiast
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,343
Received 922 Likes
on
614 Posts
Where is your proof to say I am wrong? How about you prove it. In 2012 GM added secondary cats to meet EPA regulations demanded by the US government. This obviously caused them an increased cost in production as cats are expensive. Do you think they just did it for fun? If a secondary cat fails, GM is responsible for fixing it under the 100,000 mile emissions warranty. The secondary cats do not trigger a CEL but it is still monitored by the ECU. Not sure why you think you're assumption is right. I'm so confident that I have no care or need to provide you proof. Continue thinking what you will. IDGAF
To monitor the exhaust, you'd have to have a sensor. Where is the sensor? If no MIL (that's the correct name BTW for the lamp in your cluster) is thrown then how do you know there is an error?
You're trying to brush me off because clearly you lack the technical knowledge and the ability to articulate your point with facts. I'm stating facts.
Emissions testing is done thru the monitoring of various sensors in the intake and exhaust systems. These sensors allow a closed loop monitoring function to operate (I don't think you understand controls, let along know what a closed loop system is at this point). When a monitoring function detects a problem it throws a DTC (that's a diagnostic Trouble Code) and raises the MIL light to notify the driver. If there are no DTCs and there is no MIL light there is no problem.
An emissions control device that has no sensor, no monitor, and no DTC/MIL notification is not a control device. That's engineering, something you clearly do not understand.
And I do give a ****, because I'm sick and tired of people who are ignorant spreading DISINFORMATION on the internet. You sir are a piece of work, swoop in, challenge my statements which I have backed up with sound logic and engineering knowledge and then claim you don't need to prove yourself. In the future what you should do is refrain from speaking.
The following 2 users liked this post by LT1 Z51:
burnedout (09-27-2023),
ssmith751827 (08-30-2019)