MGW Shifter
I just had the MGW shifter installed in my Z51 Corvette. My dealer did the install. I would have tried it myself, but I am living in the city with no access to tools or a garage.
From my brief time in the car, I can tell you that shifts are far more positive and throws are shorter. Its a worthwhile investment.
If you have hesitated on this purchase, you shouldn't. Just do it!
CB


Can you please comment on any additional shift effort required, that is typically associated with short shifters ??
I love the idea of a more positive & precise feel, but I've already got enough issue 'forcing' the shifter into 5th or 7th gears as it is, and don't need MORE effort to get into these upper gears... especially when I'm in a rush.
In theory, MGW has fairly eliminated this issue with their current design, that includes a complete lower 'shift box' where the extra leverage is needed because lesser short shifters typically alter the shift lever geometry only, and leave the OEM lower receiver & mount areas unchanged.
THANKS for the info !!
.
Last edited by EvilBoffin; Sep 16, 2015 at 10:03 AM.
Can you please comment on any additional shift effort required, that is typically associated with short shifters ??
I love the idea of a more positive & precise feel, but I've already got enough issue 'forcing' the shifter into 5th or 7th gears as it is, and don't need MORE effort to get into these upper gears... especially when I'm in a rush.
In theory, MGW has fairly eliminated this issue with their current design, that includes a complete lower 'shift box' where the extra leverage is needed because lesser short shifters typically alter the shift lever geometry only, and leave the OEM lower receiver & mount areas unchanged.
THANKS for the info !!
.
The transmission shift rod force stays constant, so even with zero friction, if you shorten the throw, there will be an increase in shift force at the top of the stick.
It all comes down to geometry and physics...
Here is a quick analysis of the relationship between the pivot point and the force required to shift...
With a good compromise of at stick 6.5 inches above the pivot point, and a throw of 3 inches, if you shorten the throw to 2 inches (1/3) then the shift effort increases by 1.5 times.
If you shorten the throw by shortening the top part of the stick (by about 2-3/8") instead of raising the pivot point, then the shift effort is about 1.57 the 3 inch throw, essentially the same.
Last edited by TEXHAWK0; Sep 16, 2015 at 04:27 PM.
Chris
The effort is slightly more in my opinion but I like the more positive, bolt-action of the shifter. I agree that hitting third and fifth are much easier to get into vs the factory shifter.
I did my own install and it was fairly simple. The hardest part was getting the factory boot tucked under the shifter boot.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts


I agree that a stock 6-speed tranny in either C5 or C6 does make the C7 7-speed pattern feel 'crowded'. Trying to get into the higher gears in my new C7 seems to take a lot of deliberate focus.
I will admit to being very sensitive to the feel of both clutch & shifter...
I've owned 2 C6 manuals myself (a Z51 & Grand Sport). Because of the vague C6 clutch feel, I installed the C5z clutch spring on both of them - it made it much easier to feel the clutch take-up point.
Never did a short shifter before though, but I did keep up with George's (MGW) progress with the development of his shifter during the C6 years. It really seems that he has it down to a science now.
Luckily for us, the C7 is nearly identical to the C5-C6 shifter mechanism, so we can still benefit from all that research...
.


I'm not even sure I would say the effort is increased over the stock shifter, because the action is much smoother, and much more precise. I can't imagine anyone regretting the purchase.
















