High Pressure Fuel Pump Failure #2
#1
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
High Pressure Fuel Pump Failure #2
So...back in December my car starting making a terrible vibration type noise from under the intake manifold and it turned out being the stock LT1 high pressure fuel pump that took a ****. Replaced it with the LT4 fuel pump and just last week the car started making the same noise only worse this time. Car wouldn't idle, through check engine codes and of course the pump basically sheered itself off the the factory mounting plate and was not supplying fuel properly of course.
So...the car is boosted and cammed with the 32% larger fuel lobe. I am starting to think maybe the fuel lobe could be out of spec or possibly too oversized? I am kicking around the idea of pulling the cam and having a look and maybe just going with the z06 fuel lobe instead of the 32% larger lobe.
Anyone else having issues??? It is a cam that my tuner has put in multiple cars.
So...the car is boosted and cammed with the 32% larger fuel lobe. I am starting to think maybe the fuel lobe could be out of spec or possibly too oversized? I am kicking around the idea of pulling the cam and having a look and maybe just going with the z06 fuel lobe instead of the 32% larger lobe.
Anyone else having issues??? It is a cam that my tuner has put in multiple cars.
Last edited by C7&7; 03-17-2016 at 02:11 PM.
#3
Race Director
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 10,763
Received 2,379 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
yes the LT4 sheared off with a lash cap and stock lobe. now stock lobe, LT4 pump and no lash cap, no problems.
#4
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
It sheared off the mounting plate basically? Not where it attaches to the block but where the pump attaches to the factory plate? So you were running the lt4 pump with lash and a factory lobe? Now you're running the lt4 pump and factory lt1 lobe or lt4 lobe?
Last edited by C7&7; 03-17-2016 at 02:45 PM.
#5
Race Director
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 10,763
Received 2,379 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
LT4 pump, LT1 lobe, lash cap = sheared
no lash cap = all good
LT4 pump has a shorter throw than the LT1....
no lash cap = all good
LT4 pump has a shorter throw than the LT1....
Last edited by Higgs Boson; 03-17-2016 at 02:49 PM.
#6
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
#7
Race Director
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 10,763
Received 2,379 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
#8
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
#9
#11
Race Director
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 10,763
Received 2,379 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
#12
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
Yea he does..and the LT4 pump now. His setup is virtually identical to mine except he hasn't seen this issue.
I am just baffled by it because there are tons of cars our there with an oversized fuel lobe not destroying fuel pumps....
I am just gonna change the cam it go back with the normal fuel lobe. Assuming I will have enough fuel with the LT4 pump not overdriven. Might do a DOD delete cam while Im in there.
I am just baffled by it because there are tons of cars our there with an oversized fuel lobe not destroying fuel pumps....
I am just gonna change the cam it go back with the normal fuel lobe. Assuming I will have enough fuel with the LT4 pump not overdriven. Might do a DOD delete cam while Im in there.
#13
Yea he does..and the LT4 pump now. His setup is virtually identical to mine except he hasn't seen this issue.
I am just baffled by it because there are tons of cars our there with an oversized fuel lobe not destroying fuel pumps....
I am just gonna change the cam it go back with the normal fuel lobe. Assuming I will have enough fuel with the LT4 pump not overdriven. Might do a DOD delete cam while Im in there.
I am just baffled by it because there are tons of cars our there with an oversized fuel lobe not destroying fuel pumps....
I am just gonna change the cam it go back with the normal fuel lobe. Assuming I will have enough fuel with the LT4 pump not overdriven. Might do a DOD delete cam while Im in there.
#14
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
#15
I have a stock pump that I purchased from Theta a long time back when he swapped his out. I bought this to work with in an effort to build a higher volume pump but decided against the idea due to the potential leak into the crankcase should there be a seal failure. Anyway I have never looked but there must be a preferred install height to make sure the pump isnt going into a dangerous area of the stroke. where its being almost bottomed. There are variations to parts although they are close but when your pushing things to the max this could be just like a valve spring going into coil bind. I have not installed a pump and only have the one to work with. I guess assumptions have been made that the mounting height of the pump flange on the std versus Z valley cover are the same. I believe I have both and if so I will check. Would make sense that they would be but GM does plenty of things that make NO sense what so ever. Just throwing some thoughts out. Havent had an engine to take apart to completely research things.
bob
bob
#16
Burning Brakes
I haven't seen the lt1 and lt4 pumps side by side. Is it possible they are the same pump but the lt4 version just has the lower throw to incease pressure? If that is the only difference i think ill stay with my lt1 pump and aftermarket cam. (I had been thinking of upgrading to lt4 hpfp and injectors to run flex fuel)
Last edited by 555ctsv; 03-19-2016 at 11:26 AM.
#17
Race Director
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 10,763
Received 2,379 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
I haven't seen the lt1 and lt4 pumps side by side. Is it possible they are the same pump but the lt4 version just has the lower throw to incease pressure? If that is the only difference i think ill stay with my lt1 pump and aftermarket cam. (I had been thinking of upgrading to lt4 hpfp and injectors to run flex fuel)
if I could do it again I would leave it all stock, add the CPR pump and meth and that's it.
if you are NA you can run E85 without changing any parts. Boost and E85....not going to happen without meth anyways so why change anything?
#19
Race Director
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 10,763
Received 2,379 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
won't even be close to enough without meth but since you are already running meth, what's the point in dropping all that cash on fuel system parts when you can just turn the meth up instead? not to mention you don't need E85 if you are already running meth.
Last edited by Higgs Boson; 03-19-2016 at 08:32 PM.
#20
Burning Brakes