When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
OP here I don't care what other say to you these motors need one for sure. I don't care how you drive your car unless you drive it like a little old lade and never give it much gas at all.
You car with this inj set up needs one for sure. Even if only gets a cup of crap in it in a year that is that much not down into the intake and on the back side of the valves. I an N/A motor and yes I have one in almost 1 1/2 years have cleaned it one time with very little in it. Robert
photo your dipstick level every 1000 miles and look for a change
look in the cold air tube between the mass air sensor and throttle body for oil
look behind the throttle body for oil
if you see anything that bothers you, then you are the type who would appreciate a c/c and i suggest begin researching one that has the functions most relevant to your issue(s).
if nothing bothers you, then all good, you are like most others putting up and down the road every day without one.
There have been cases where engine warranty has been denied for modification of the system with a catch can. The risk is not worth it to me.
if you are worried about warranty leave your car stock or make sure it is stock when taking in for warranty work.
I don't know what the hang up is with catch cans specifically on this subject but it goes the same for ANY aftermarket mod, the dealer reserves the right to void a claim for about anything it can put the blame on.
if you are worried about warranty leave your car stock or make sure it is stock when taking in for warranty work.
I don't know what the hang up is with catch cans specifically on this subject but it goes the same for ANY aftermarket mod, the dealer reserves the right to void a claim for about anything it can put the blame on.
It makes sense to ignore warranty when there is a proven benefit to handling or power. When Tadge says it's not needed and there will be warranty repercussions, that a different story. If this could hurt the engine, the engineers would know it from testing. They would not advise against something that could prevent warranty claims. If a catch can had no possibility of harming the engine, why would they speak out on it so much? They need to prove the mod caused the damage before denying the claim. They have done so on a few occasions.
They need to prove the mod caused the damage before denying the claim.
GM can deny a warranty for any reason. The are obligated to defend the denial only if challenged by the owner in court after the denial which can take a long time. And don't think they deny on a whim, they have their ducks in a row before blocking the claim.
Last edited by vettetwo; Oct 24, 2016 at 05:47 PM.
GM can deny a warranty for any reason. The are obligated to defend the denial only if challenged by the owner in court after the denial which can take a long time.
You absolutely have a point there. At the same time, we are talking about something that could save the engine. Why would they want to stop that? They have also tested this engine for hundreds of thousands of miles. They know what the end result will be. You want to stop the things that cost you money and encourage, and eventually copy, those that save you money. That's not the behavior here. That's why its suspect.
You absolutely have a point there. At the same time, we are talking about something that could save the engine. Why would they want to stop that? They have also tested this engine for hundreds of thousands of miles. They know what the end result will be. You want to stop the things that cost you money and encourage, and eventually copy, those that save you money. That's not the behavior here. That's why its suspect.
I dont think it has anything to do with saving the engine or making the engine better long term. Its the fact that GM wants the cars to be OEM. Also GM doesn't know if you installed your catch can right, or if you used a good catch can brand. They dont want to deal with the BS.
I know my dads yukon DI V8 has turned 80k miles this month. I asked him if he noticed any problems or anything weird. He said the car runs smooth, and gets around the same MPG as new. Better believe he runs the cheapest gas he can find also.
We do not know with all certainty why GM consistently states their engines do not need catch cans. We know very well the position of those selling catch cans, but warranty denials because catch cans have been added have never been tested which would disclose the reasons for GM denials.
Originally Posted by falconhulk
They have also tested this engine for hundreds of thousands of miles. They know what the end result will be.
That is absolutely correct. There are no results published for the long term effect of using a catch can. We see short term results all of the time with pictures of the gunk captured in the cans which is mostly condensation with oil in it.
We do not know with all certainty where the coking on GM engines comes from and to what extent, and it is starting to come out recently that it is not 100% caused by PCV fumes, but also by combustion byproducts which have several theories for minimization. I think we can be certain GM knows a lot more about this than has been disclosed on this Forum.
Last edited by vettetwo; Oct 24, 2016 at 06:56 PM.