C7 Tech/Performance Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1/4 time help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 16, 2017 | 03:41 PM
  #1  
S'vette's Avatar
S'vette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 81
From: Tumwater, WA
Default 1/4 time help

I have an A8 Z51 with ARH Mids and the ECS SC running @ 6 psi basically on 91 0ctane at 3600 feet elevation and tuned running 525 whp. Stock tires with 16,000 miles but still look good. Temps are now around 55 degrees here.

Using my PDR as a reference before and after mods, I know it may not be truly accurate but I think its a good tool just to see how things are improving. Did a run today with the SC having about 500 miles on it. In sport mode, using launch control I got this: Not a track but will try to get to a track in the spring.

0-60 = 4.2
0-100 = 8.2
1/4 = 12.1 @ 126 mph
Good bit of lost traction in 1st.

With just the mids and a tune I got:
0-60 = 4.4
0-100 = 9.3
1/4 = 12.5 @119

0 - 100 was a good improvement but the 1/4 mile wasn't as much. I think my car might be an under performer from factory so Im looking at the before and afters to see how its improved. I know better tires will help and a better launch.

What Im wondering is: Is this a normal improvement from the before to the after with the SC on with 6 psi? Its 6 psi cuz of the altitude so I will get it up to about 8 PSI with a mod on the intake restrictor plate. Or is there maybe some tuning tweeks that can be done to help improve the run? Not sure how well the tuner knows the C7 so I will be asking for the file from him so maybe someone can look at it and let me know if its a good tune or not. He uses HP Tuners.

From the times posted, what would my times be like if I was able to use 93 octane and say 500 elevation?

Thanks.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2017 | 03:50 PM
  #2  
DOUG @ ECS's Avatar
DOUG @ ECS
Premium Supporting Vendor
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,599
Likes: 1,224
From: Providing the most proven supercharger kits for your C5/6/7 609-752-0321
Default

You can send the file to me if you like. I am more familiar with track slip break down than 0-60/0-100 times, but in general I see an average of 11.0/128 with our kit on a bone stock car.
Some have made it into the tens with good air, with your elevation I would expect somewhere in the 11.4/11.6 range.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2017 | 03:53 PM
  #3  
S'vette's Avatar
S'vette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 81
From: Tumwater, WA
Default

Originally Posted by DOUG @ ECS
You can send the file to me if you like. I am more familiar with track slip break down than 0-60/0-100 times, but in general I see an average of 11.0/128 with our kit on a bone stock car.
Some have made it into the tens with good air, with your elevation I would expect somewhere in the 11.4/11.6 range.
Sounds good and thanks. Like I said I think my car was on the slower side from the factory from the runs I have done with it compared to the 2015 Z51 A8 I had in stock form on both. But Im just looking to see if the gains with the SC on now are about normal from the before.

What do you think of the fact that I improved 1.1 secs on the 0 - 100 but only .4 on the 1/4?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2017 | 07:03 PM
  #4  
Spulbus2013's Avatar
Spulbus2013
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 227
Likes: 14
From: Houston TX
Default

Originally Posted by S'vette
Sounds good and thanks. Like I said I think my car was on the slower side from the factory from the runs I have done with it compared to the 2015 Z51 A8 I had in stock form on both. But Im just looking to see if the gains with the SC on now are about normal from the before.

What do you think of the fact that I improved 1.1 secs on the 0 - 100 but only .4 on the 1/4?
Maybe trans/tune related or some other wacky deal with the data recorder.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 12:02 AM
  #5  
S'vette's Avatar
S'vette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 81
From: Tumwater, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Dizzyscure1
Maybe trans/tune related or some other wacky deal with the data recorder.
Yea not really sure how accurate the PDR is but I use it as a rough guideline till I can get to the track. I would think it is fairly accurate though to be used as a device to show how much you have improved. Kinda like dynos which can be different so if you use the same one things should show a some what true gain on mods.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2017 | 09:47 AM
  #6  
SouthBaySurfer's Avatar
SouthBaySurfer
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 76
From: Great River NY
Default

I don't know anything about the accuracy of the PDR, but 126mph is pretty impressive. It should translate to low to mid 11's. Check the sticky that shows the C7 fast list for comparable trap speeds.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2017 | 08:20 PM
  #7  
S'vette's Avatar
S'vette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 81
From: Tumwater, WA
Default

Originally Posted by SouthBaySurfer
I don't know anything about the accuracy of the PDR, but 126mph is pretty impressive. It should translate to low to mid 11's. Check the sticky that shows the C7 fast list for comparable trap speeds.
I too thought the trap was pretty good but then the time had me a little perplexed. Im sure the PDR may not be acurate but I hope it is atleast consistant so I can use for befores and aters. I guess a track date is in need in the spring or early summer.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2017 | 08:46 AM
  #8  
BRCC's Avatar
BRCC
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 54
From: Granbury, Pecan Plantation TX
Default

Originally Posted by S'vette
Yea not really sure how accurate the PDR is but I use it as a rough guideline till I can get to the track. I would think it is fairly accurate though to be used as a device to show how much you have improved. Kinda like dynos which can be different so if you use the same one things should show a some what true gain on mods.
I would take the PDR with a grain of salt, it doesn’t take Roll Out into account where on a track you do get that, also any pre-launch movement will trigger the PDR. So again I would suggest the real test should be on the track and with your trap speeds I would assume somewhere in the 11s.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 20, 2017 | 03:11 AM
  #9  
thrilled's Avatar
thrilled
Safety Car
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 668
From: Kilmarnock Va
Default

I believe Car and driver had the C7 A6 do 0-60 in 3.9 sec if I remember right.The M7 0-60 4.1 or 4.2 .The temperature didn't help you.to cold.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2017 | 01:07 AM
  #10  
S'vette's Avatar
S'vette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 81
From: Tumwater, WA
Default

Originally Posted by thrilled
I believe Car and driver had the C7 A6 do 0-60 in 3.9 sec if I remember right.The M7 0-60 4.1 or 4.2 .The temperature didn't help you.to cold.
You think it was too cold for the enigine or the wheels? I know the wheels were too cold but I thought the engine would benifit from the cold.

As a note I did a 0-60 run today and the temp was high 50s. I had read in another thread to do the run in Touring with the TC off and no launch control, I did do a real quick burnout, just a little smoke, and was able to get a 4.0. So thats .2 better than before and should result in high 11s if I can get that when I do another 1/4 mile run.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2017 | 03:22 AM
  #11  
thrilled's Avatar
thrilled
Safety Car
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 668
From: Kilmarnock Va
Default

Originally Posted by S'vette
You think it was too cold for the enigine or the wheels? I know the wheels were too cold but I thought the engine would benifit from the cold.

As a note I did a 0-60 run today and the temp was high 50s. I had read in another thread to do the run in Touring with the TC off and no launch control, I did do a real quick burnout, just a little smoke, and was able to get a 4.0. So thats .2 better than before and should result in high 11s if I can get that when I do another 1/4 mile run.
I was talking about stock tires.As far as the engine goes the yellow or orange rim at the RPM's let you know when the engines warm enough.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2017 | 02:22 PM
  #12  
davepl's Avatar
davepl
Le Mans Master
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 8,729
Likes: 1,508
From: Redmond WA
Default

Remember that ET is so traction-dependent that in a car like this it's almost useless as a metric unless you've got drag radials, a prepped track, and so on.

MPH is really the indication of horsepower you're looking for. I know it's not what bench racers quote all the time, but you're looking for back to back comparisons, and that's much more accurate if you use the MPH and not the ET.

Dave
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2017 | 07:21 PM
  #13  
S'vette's Avatar
S'vette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 81
From: Tumwater, WA
Default

Thanks for the replies guys. Im waiting to find some time and a place to do a couple more runs now that I have found a pretty good way of launching the car and see how my MPH go.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2017 | 09:00 PM
  #14  
Robnelson54's Avatar
Robnelson54
Advanced
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 50
Likes: 2
From: Orlando FL
Default

Originally Posted by S'vette
Thanks for the replies guys. Im waiting to find some time and a place to do a couple more runs now that I have found a pretty good way of launching the car and see how my MPH go.
like posted above, running stock tires and on the streets is no way to measure your true 1/4 time.
at 525hp you don't need to go crazy on wheels. Just get some nitto nt05r for your stock rears.. then get it on a track. You will never have real reaction on the streets. I guarantee you that you will be in the low 11s if not High 10s if you do these two simple things.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To 1/4 time help





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-1
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE
story-8
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

Slideshow: 5 most and least popular Corvette model years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 13:25:01


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette buyer's guide

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-17 16:41:08


VIEW MORE