When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I just finished porting my TB and when installing the blade again, I discovered that the blades open more than 100% (starts to close again).
Is it adjustable what the maximum movement of the blade is?
I would like to limit the movement, so that the blade is just horizontal.
I am aware of that fact and this is why I was very conservative with my porting and I bought a TB from someone who bought a ported one.
Or with other words, if there are problems with the self ported TB, I have an original on top.
However, the porting doesn't explain why the blade opens more than 100%.
Well, that is asked a bit much at 4000 rpm on the highway ....
I know that there are sensors, but how do I know the blade moves to horizontal at max?
I think I will install a positive stop.
I wouldn't install a stop. Often there is a built in test/calibration routine for these motors and if you stop it prior to the intended end of rotation it may recalibrate so that full throttle is no longer fully open. I believe you are overthinking this issue.
And if you don't design carefully your stop could turn into a stuck. Stuck at WOT wouldn't be good. Adding something that isn't needed just creates the potential for problems.
I wouldn't install a stop. Often there is a built in test/calibration routine for these motors and if you stop it prior to the intended end of rotation it may recalibrate so that full throttle is no longer fully open. I believe you are overthinking this issue.
It is possible that installing a stop leads to a the blade to not open fully anymore.
It is also possible that it opens beyond 100% without a stop.
Given the cutting corners mentallity of GM I wouldn't be surprised.
I will give it some more thoughts how to find out, maybe someone has an idea.
I just had a look at the mechanics behind the plastic cover and there are even two positive stops already.
One for fully open position and one for the fully closed position.
It just seems that fully open is a bit more than fully open in my case.
As mentioned earlier, there are several tuning softwares that will tell you the exact position of the throttle blade while the engine is running. Find a friend with HP Tuners or EFI Live, and there are others.
Here in Germany it is completely unkommen to have devices like HP Tuners and I don't know anybody who has it.
There is also not much knowledge around here, Chevrolet sells 500 Corvettes per year in all of Europe, maybe 150 in Germany.
Anyhow, today I installed my self-ported TB and the good news is:
No codes, no ill effect, all runs like it should
The even better news are, that two things that I didn't like, are cured:
1. When you wanted to drive really slow, like walking speed, you felt like riding a kangaroo.
2. Starting really slow from standstill with little throttle was not possible, the engine would just stop.
Both unpleasant bevaviours are gone and also I noticed that it idles much more stable, the rpm meter looks like nailed down now and the throttle response is much better. No hesitation, no stumble.
If it added any torque or not I don't know, but I would assume a little at maximum.
I just finished porting my TB and when installing the blade again, I discovered that the blades open more than 100% (starts to close again).
Is it adjustable what the maximum movement of the blade is?
I would like to limit the movement, so that the blade is just horizontal.
Thanks guys.
Regards
Götz
The electric motor and computer tell the blade how far to open and close. There is no adjustments. If you noticed , you can close the blade tight in the throttle body opening and open it more than wide open. The blade and shaft always spring back to where its supposed to as its made to do that.
It is correct, that the electric motor and the position sensor determine how far to open the blade.
When you disconnect the battery and the later connect it again, the system doesn't know where the blade actually is.
It then calibrates itself by fully opening (up to the positive stop) and by fully closing it (to the other positive stop).
These positions then are used as 100% and 0% positions, that are used by the computer to determine hor far to open the blade.
If the assumed 100% position is a 110% in reality, then at WOT (when the computer sets the blade at the 100% position) the blade is beyond fully open - reducing max performance.
That is why I think about how to
- Measure where the blades move to in reality at WOT (not what the comouter things where they are)
- How to best make sure that WOT is 100% open - not more and not less
It is correct, that the electric motor and the position sensor determine how far to open the blade.
When you disconnect the battery and the later connect it again, the system doesn't know where the blade actually is.
It then calibrates itself by fully opening (up to the positive stop) and by fully closing it (to the other positive stop).
These positions then are used as 100% and 0% positions, that are used by the computer to determine hor far to open the blade.
If the assumed 100% position is a 110% in reality, then at WOT (when the computer sets the blade at the 100% position) the blade is beyond fully open - reducing max performance.
That is why I think about how to
- Measure where the blades move to in reality at WOT (not what the comouter things where they are)
- How to best make sure that WOT is 100% open - not more and not less
Regards
Götz
let us know when you figure it out, very interesting if there was a way you could determine what position the blade is in during WOT. If you turn on the key without starting vehicle and remove the elbow to see the inside of the TB, and a second person puts the throttle to the floor and holds it, will the blade go to WOT?.
I am confident that the open stop is beyond the 100% open point by design. The number of degrees between stops is a known value greater than 90 degrees and the calibration protocol steps the positioner through the entire possible range of motion and then calibrates it based upon the designed in overshoot so that commanded fully open is truly fully open. Although accurate operation of these sensor controlled stepper motors is very good it is not possible to avoid some inaccuracy to a fraction of a degree and if the positive open stop was EXACTLY at fully open then you could easily end up with the situation where commanded fully open hits the stop before the sensor agrees it is fully open and you would have an error situation where the stepper motor would be attempting to open past the stop. By designing a few degrees of slack into the system and calibrating based upon this known amount of over-travel you avoid this error situation and will have a throttle blade which is fully open in terms of air flow and resulting performance even if it is actually half a degree plus or minus from true full open.
I am confident that the open stop is beyond the 100% open point by design. The number of degrees between stops is a known value greater than 90 degrees and the calibration protocol steps the positioner through the entire possible range of motion and then calibrates it based upon the designed in overshoot so that commanded fully open is truly fully open. Although accurate operation of these sensor controlled stepper motors is very good it is not possible to avoid some inaccuracy to a fraction of a degree and if the positive open stop was EXACTLY at fully open then you could easily end up with the situation where commanded fully open hits the stop before the sensor agrees it is fully open and you would have an error situation where the stepper motor would be attempting to open past the stop. By designing a few degrees of slack into the system and calibrating based upon this known amount of over-travel you avoid this error situation and will have a throttle blade which is fully open in terms of air flow and resulting performance even if it is actually half a degree plus or minus from true full open.
So the mechanical limits are greater to allow full close and full open electronically and not have any possible interference from the stops.
And we have to accept a + or - small possible error factor which wouldn't amount enough to be concerned about. I quess one could manually do a perfect 90 degree WOT measurement and tweak the WOT stop to just beyond that for wiggle room and depending how much further that WOT stop is set from the TB vender.
It is correct, that the electric motor and the position sensor determine how far to open the blade.
When you disconnect the battery and the later connect it again, the system doesn't know where the blade actually is. It then calibrates itself by fully opening (up to the positive stop) and by fully closing it (to the other positive stop).
These positions then are used as 100% and 0% positions, that are used by the computer to determine hor far to open the blade.
If the assumed 100% position is a 110% in reality, then at WOT (when the computer sets the blade at the 100% position) the blade is beyond fully open - reducing max performance.
That is why I think about how to
- Measure where the blades move to in reality at WOT (not what the comouter things where they are)
- How to best make sure that WOT is 100% open - not more and not less
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.