C7 Tech/Performance Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Engine HP..need smart Gearhead!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2017 | 04:14 PM
  #1  
Dave502's Avatar
Dave502
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 373
Likes: 37
From: West Palm Beach Florida
Default Engine HP..need smart Gearhead!!!

OK......example LT1...460 HP?.....is that 460 hp in the enclosed engine room Dyno with no add on to put drag on motor like AC,Alt,Power steering transmission etc....or is that 460 hp to the rear wheels (rwhp)..if it is rwhp then you need to add approx 15% ( for standard Trans) to the rwhp to get hp to crank.....which would make the LT1 (460 rwhp + 15%=529 hp to crank (motor).....Talk to me...what is on motor when dynoed at 460?

Thanks
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2017 | 05:10 PM
  #2  
vetteZpilot's Avatar
vetteZpilot
Instructor
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 105
Likes: 27
From: Florence Kentucky
Default

12%-15% less than the 460 you have at the crank is what you will have at the wheels .
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2017 | 08:27 PM
  #3  
Dave502's Avatar
Dave502
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 373
Likes: 37
From: West Palm Beach Florida
Default

Originally Posted by vetteZpilot
12%-15% less than the 460 you have at the crank is what you will have at the wheels .
I agree 100%...that comes out to about 400 rwhp on stock LT1......Its amazing how many people have gotten base line dynos and their numbers are nowhere close to that.....Which means after their mods the hp is not close either....I know Mustang dynos are better for tuning and read about 10% less than a Dynojet which should be close....If you take the time to search a bunch of dynos it becomes funny..
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2017 | 10:19 PM
  #4  
FYREANT's Avatar
FYREANT
I'm Batman..
Supporting Lifetime
10 Year Member
Pro Mechanic
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 6,142
Likes: 920
From: Lehigh Acres FL
Tech Contributor
Default

Dyno Dynamics read pretty much in the middle of dynojet and mustang. They are the closest to accurate I've seen.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2017 | 05:10 PM
  #5  
GarryZR1's Avatar
GarryZR1
Pro
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 737
Likes: 100
From: Bowling Green, Kentucky
Default

Dave 502

The SAE rating is 460 hp at the flywheel. It includes all accessory loads. IN 1972 Socoety of Automotibve Engineers (SAE) changed the standard hp rating to include all engine loads. The rear wheel power will be reduced by an amount for the traansmission and differential and other drive train losses (inefficiencies).

I agree the RWHP will be 12 to 15% less than the 460 at the flywheel.

Last edited by GarryZR1; Aug 26, 2017 at 05:11 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2017 | 07:49 PM
  #6  
Dave502's Avatar
Dave502
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 373
Likes: 37
From: West Palm Beach Florida
Default

Originally Posted by GarryZR1
Dave 502

The SAE rating is 460 hp at the flywheel. It includes all accessory loads. IN 1972 Socoety of Automotibve Engineers (SAE) changed the standard hp rating to include all engine loads. The rear wheel power will be reduced by an amount for the traansmission and differential and other drive train losses (inefficiencies).

I agree the RWHP will be 12 to 15% less than the 460 at the flywheel.


Thanks for the info....Does that mean that the top Dog in 1970 the 450 hp 454 Chevelle was really only 392 hp with 13% loss?...Just kidding ...The point is that all these shops that have dynos hacked up to show you that you have a lot more Hp and torque than you do should Quit that
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2017 | 07:59 PM
  #7  
Dave502's Avatar
Dave502
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 373
Likes: 37
From: West Palm Beach Florida
Default

I answered my own question from a article from Hagerty...

“Rear wheel horsepower was at least 30 percent lower than the reported gross figure, in some cases even more,” Campisano said.

Some Super Chevy readers must have been stunned to see that an LS6 Chevelle SS, with 450-hp rating, put down 288 rear wheel hp in the dyno test. That would have put a net hp rating at around 350 hp for that legendary big block.

Great article about 1972 hp change
https://www.hagerty.com/articles-vid.../13/horsepower

Last edited by Dave502; Aug 26, 2017 at 08:03 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2017 | 08:02 PM
  #8  
Red Mist Rulz's Avatar
Red Mist Rulz
Race Director
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 13,180
Likes: 10,512
Default

Originally Posted by Dave502
I answered my own question from a article from Hagerty...

“Rear wheel horsepower was at least 30 percent lower than the reported gross figure, in some cases even more,” Campisano said.

Some Super Chevy readers must have been stunned to see that an LS6 Chevelle SS, with 450-hp rating, put down 288 rear wheel hp in the dyno test. That would have put a net hp rating at around 350 hp for that legendary big block.
Back in those days, auto makers used SAE Gross, which was with no accessory loads, no intake restrictions, no mufflers..... Hugely misleading.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

10 Things C8 Corvette Owners Hate (But Won't Tell You)

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Best Corvettes Coming to Barrett-Jackson Palm Beach 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-9

Every Corvette Grand Sport Explained! (C2, C4, C6, C7, & C8)

 Joe Kucinski
Old Aug 26, 2017 | 08:07 PM
  #9  
Higgs Boson's Avatar
Higgs Boson
Race Director
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 5
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 2,641
From: Texas Hill Country
Default

Originally Posted by DSOMrulz
Back in those days, auto makers used SAE Gross, which was with no accessory loads, no intake restrictions, no mufflers..... Hugely misleading.
actually I would consider it more accurate when defining actual engine horsepower. they don't call it "Engine HP with AC, power steering, emissions equipment, auto slushbox" they call it "Engine HP."

what this means is that engine advancements, drivetrain efficiency, and automotive technology in general has come even farther than we give it credit for.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2017 | 12:02 AM
  #10  
Bill Dearborn's Avatar
Bill Dearborn
Tech Contributor
25 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 40,999
Likes: 9,764
From: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Default

Originally Posted by Dave502
Thanks for the info....Does that mean that the top Dog in 1970 the 450 hp 454 Chevelle was really only 392 hp with 13% loss?...Just kidding ...The point is that all these shops that have dynos hacked up to show you that you have a lot more Hp and torque than you do should Quit that
The relationship between Gross and Net HP has changed over the years due to more efficient accessories. I used to have a 71 LS6 Corvette with a 425 HP 454 BB. That was gross HP. While I had the 71 I purchased the Assembly Manual that indicated GM was going to offer the same engine in 72 with a net HP of 330 HP but ended up never actually releasing the engine for build. Gross HP ratings were taken with no accessories and with headers Vs the stock exhaust manifolds.

With newer engines accessories have gotten more efficient and stock exhaust manifolds have also gotten more efficient so Net HP ratings are much closer to Gross HP if they actually measured gross HP anymore.

Bill
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2017 | 07:24 PM
  #11  
falconhulk's Avatar
falconhulk
Pro
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 546
Likes: 89
Default

The truth is that before SAE became the agreed upon method, relatively recently, mfg's reported whatever they wanted using whatever method they wanted.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2017 | 06:06 PM
  #12  
thrilled's Avatar
thrilled
Safety Car
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 668
From: Kilmarnock Va
Default

Originally Posted by Dave502
OK......example LT1...460 HP?.....is that 460 hp in the enclosed engine room Dyno with no add on to put drag on motor like AC,Alt,Power steering transmission etc....or is that 460 hp to the rear wheels (rwhp)..if it is rwhp then you need to add approx 15% ( for standard Trans) to the rwhp to get hp to crank.....which would make the LT1 (460 rwhp + 15%=529 hp to crank (motor).....Talk to me...what is on motor when dynoed at 460?

Thanks
460 hp at the crank.At the wheel approximately 405-420.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2017 | 06:26 PM
  #13  
FYREANT's Avatar
FYREANT
I'm Batman..
Supporting Lifetime
10 Year Member
Pro Mechanic
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 6,142
Likes: 920
From: Lehigh Acres FL
Tech Contributor
Default

Originally Posted by thrilled
460 hp at the crank.At the wheel approximately 405-420.
You lose more than 10%. 14-15% is more around the average. At the wheels on a stock C7 is about 390-395 I believe.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2017 | 08:56 PM
  #14  
Cjunkie's Avatar
Cjunkie
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,008
Likes: 1,487
From: Ashland, OH
Default

Originally Posted by FYREANT
You lose more than 10%. 14-15% is more around the average. At the wheels on a stock C7 is about 390-395 I believe.
This is correct. They dyno in the 380-390s STONE stock.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2017 | 11:36 PM
  #15  
joemosfet's Avatar
joemosfet
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 322
From: Denver Colorado
Default

I've read manual transmissions will have less drivetrain loss than automatic transmissions.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2017 | 04:18 PM
  #16  
thrilled's Avatar
thrilled
Safety Car
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 668
From: Kilmarnock Va
Default

Originally Posted by FYREANT
You lose more than 10%. 14-15% is more around the average. At the wheels on a stock C7 is about 390-395 I believe.
mine was 410.I believe the automatic is around what you said.I added some goodies.Now I have 590 at the wheel.Approximately 40-50
more than the Z06.

Last edited by thrilled; Sep 4, 2017 at 04:21 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2017 | 04:40 PM
  #17  
cv67's Avatar
cv67
Team Owner
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 81,241
Likes: 3,062
From: altered state
St. Jude Donor '05
Default

Originally Posted by falconhulk
The truth is that before SAE became the agreed upon method, relatively recently, mfg's reported whatever they wanted using whatever method they wanted.

This!!

True compression, cam specs etc. Still done today by many mfrs.....dont get hung up on dyno #s car will still run the same.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Engine HP..need smart Gearhead!!!

Old Sep 5, 2017 | 09:56 PM
  #18  
Gearhead Jim's Avatar
Gearhead Jim
Team Owner
Supporting Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 24,964
Likes: 2,680
From: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
St. Jude Donor '13
Default

Originally Posted by falconhulk
The truth is that before SAE became the agreed upon method, relatively recently, mfg's reported whatever they wanted using whatever method they wanted.


In the past, some of GM's performance specifications seemed to have been written by the Advertising Department rather than by Engineering.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2017 | 10:37 PM
  #19  
rkj427's Avatar
rkj427
Race Director
Supporting Lifetime
10 Year Member
Pro Mechanic
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 15,060
Likes: 4,740
From: Washington Township Michigan
2025 C8 Stingray of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C6 of the Year Winner - Unmodified
2020 C6 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2019 C6 of Year Finalist (appearance mods)
Default

Originally Posted by joemosfet
I've read manual transmissions will have less drivetrain loss than automatic transmissions.
true statement.......................... more a mechanical connection than a hydraulic connection
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2017 | 08:06 AM
  #20  
Bill Dearborn's Avatar
Bill Dearborn
Tech Contributor
25 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 40,999
Likes: 9,764
From: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Default

Originally Posted by Gearhead Jim


In the past, some of GM's performance specifications seemed to have been written by the Advertising Department rather than by Engineering.
There was an art form to the lies though. Back in the day drag race classes were based on advertised hp to weight figures. GM seemed to have a knack for building lighter cars than Ford or Chrysler and lied less about HP. So a guy could go the strip in a stock 57 Chevy 2 Dr Hardtop with a 270 horse small block and completely blow away an 8 year newer Mustang with a 270 horse motor. It happened all the time.

Bill
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 PM.

story-0
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-2
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE
story-5
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

Slideshow: 5 most and least popular Corvette model years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 13:25:01


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette buyer's guide

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-17 16:41:08


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Things C8 Corvette Owners Hate (But Won't Tell You)

Slideshow: 10 things C8 Corvette owners hate, but won't tell you.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-01 18:36:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Best Corvettes Coming to Barrett-Jackson Palm Beach 2026!

Slideshow: Should you add one of these incredible Corvettes to your garage?

By Brett Foote | 2026-04-01 18:14:05


VIEW MORE
story-9
Every Corvette Grand Sport Explained! (C2, C4, C6, C7, & C8)

Slideshow: Every Corvette Grand Sport explained

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-03-26 07:13:44


VIEW MORE