Direct injection carbon deposits
#1
Direct injection carbon deposits
I have been reading a lot about this problem with direct injection engines. Does anyone know if it is an issue with the LT1 engine or if there is any preventive maintenance to avoid it?
#2
I'm Batman..
Pro Mechanic
Member Since: Apr 2014
Location: Lehigh Acres FL
Posts: 6,131
Received 908 Likes
on
561 Posts
Tech Contributor
Lots of good reading in this thread. Make you own decision afterwards.
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...-this-out.html
Ant
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...-this-out.html
Ant
The following users liked this post:
Johnpaulny (07-07-2018)
#3
Le Mans Master
Lots of good reading in this thread. Make you own decision afterwards.
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...-this-out.html
Ant
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...-this-out.html
Ant
The following users liked this post:
Johnpaulny (07-07-2018)
#4
Burning Brakes
As long as you are still under warranty or have an extended warranty, don't worry about it and have a good sleep
Last edited by 911Hunter; 07-07-2018 at 07:10 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by 911Hunter:
Johnpaulny (07-07-2018),
silverja (05-06-2019)
#5
E-Ray, 3LZ, ZER, LIFT
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: NE South Carolina
Posts: 29,498
Received 9,625 Likes
on
6,629 Posts
Here is a 19 page PDF pic/text re what my reseach showed: http://netwelding.com/Catch_Can.pdf
Last edited by JerryU; 07-07-2018 at 09:59 PM.
#6
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,092
Received 8,928 Likes
on
5,333 Posts
GM has been producing DI engines since 2007 with numbers in the millions. There is no big crowd of people making noise about valve coking with those engines. The big issue with the V6 was timing chain failures. Coking was basically non existent as a complaint. You can worry about it or not worry about it but I suspect GM knows how to build engines that aren't as susceptible to it. Some of those GM engines probably have well over 100K miles on them and still there isn't any news of valve coking. I asked the Corvette Mechanic at the dealership where I take my car for service and asked him if had heard of any valve coking issues with any GM engines (they sell and service the complete GM line) and he hadn't heard of any at their shop.
Bill
Bill
The following users liked this post:
GOLD72 (07-11-2018)
#7
GM has been producing DI engines since 2007 with numbers in the millions. There is no big crowd of people making noise about valve coking with those engines. The big issue with the V6 was timing chain failures. Coking was basically non existent as a complaint. You can worry about it or not worry about it but I suspect GM knows how to build engines that aren't as susceptible to it. Some of those GM engines probably have well over 100K miles on them and still there isn't any news of valve coking. I asked the Corvette Mechanic at the dealership where I take my car for service and asked him if had heard of any valve coking issues with any GM engines (they sell and service the complete GM line) and he hadn't heard of any at their shop.
Bill
Bill
The following users liked this post:
911Hunter (07-10-2018)
#9
Le Mans Master
Just as fancy vitamins make your urine more expensive, Techron makes your exhaust more expensive.
What do you think it's going to accomplish when it's injected AFTER the deposits? That's the whole point. With port injection the techron is sprayed on the back of the valve in the intake path so it does some good. With DFI, it's shot right at the top of the piston dome.
What do you think it's going to accomplish when it's injected AFTER the deposits? That's the whole point. With port injection the techron is sprayed on the back of the valve in the intake path so it does some good. With DFI, it's shot right at the top of the piston dome.
The following users liked this post:
SECLT22021 (07-27-2021)
#10
I'm Batman..
Pro Mechanic
Member Since: Apr 2014
Location: Lehigh Acres FL
Posts: 6,131
Received 908 Likes
on
561 Posts
Tech Contributor
Just as fancy vitamins make your urine more expensive, Techron makes your exhaust more expensive.
What do you think it's going to accomplish when it's injected AFTER the deposits? That's the whole point. With port injection the techron is sprayed on the back of the valve in the intake path so it does some good. With DFI, it's shot right at the top of the piston dome.
What do you think it's going to accomplish when it's injected AFTER the deposits? That's the whole point. With port injection the techron is sprayed on the back of the valve in the intake path so it does some good. With DFI, it's shot right at the top of the piston dome.
#11
E-Ray, 3LZ, ZER, LIFT
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: NE South Carolina
Posts: 29,498
Received 9,625 Likes
on
6,629 Posts
Just as fancy vitamins make your urine more expensive, Techron makes your exhaust more expensive.
What do you think it's going to accomplish when it's injected AFTER the deposits? That's the whole point. With port injection the Techron is sprayed on the back of the valve in the intake path so it does some good. With DFI, it's shot right at the top of the piston dome.
What do you think it's going to accomplish when it's injected AFTER the deposits? That's the whole point. With port injection the Techron is sprayed on the back of the valve in the intake path so it does some good. With DFI, it's shot right at the top of the piston dome.
I use Top Tier ~half the time BUT Sam's Club non Top Tier the other half. Just checked the Net and Sam's 93 octane is $2.89/gallon and Shell, where I buy because it is the lowest and near buy is $3.44/gallon. It's typically ~$0.50/gallon cheaper. I checked the SDS sheets and the GM and Techron look to be the same, same bottle shape as well. Probably repackaged Techron!
I use it "mostly" to avoid sulfur deposits on the fuel sender! Never thought about it before BUT with the C7 to fix a fuel sender the whole rear drive train needs to be removed! Even when on warranty, don't want a dealer removing my rear drive-train! A forum member posted he was horrified when he saw his drive-train on the dealer's floor! Another said the dealer put in two bottles of the GM "gas additive" and his erratic fuel sender reading problem went away. Charged him $100. I recently posted that info when a member said his was acting up and he added a few bottles and all was fine!
Top Tier has nothing to do with sulfur content! It is an additive that can dissolve sulfur. Some crude oil has more than 3% sulfur that is mostly removed in processing. In fact both Techron and the GM product list keeping the sender sulfur free as a benefit. It also can help the injectors clean. Agreed with DI can't do anything for "coking" on the intake valves. .One bottle is cheaper that the 15 gallon difference in price between Shell and Same's Club! (Note we do not have a Costco which is Top Tier.) I plan on using a bottle between oil changes as well!
Last edited by JerryU; 07-10-2018 at 12:53 PM.
#12
Don't know if it helps but I run Gumout direct injection cleaner or Seafoam DI cleaner about every 500-1000 miles. It seem to run stronger after when I run the 1/4 mile at the strip.
#13
Le Mans Master
Just run c16
#15
Race Director
GM has been producing DI engines since 2007 with numbers in the millions. There is no big crowd of people making noise about valve coking with those engines. The big issue with the V6 was timing chain failures. Coking was basically non existent as a complaint. You can worry about it or not worry about it but I suspect GM knows how to build engines that aren't as susceptible to it. Some of those GM engines probably have well over 100K miles on them and still there isn't any news of valve coking. I asked the Corvette Mechanic at the dealership where I take my car for service and asked him if had heard of any valve coking issues with any GM engines (they sell and service the complete GM line) and he hadn't heard of any at their shop.
Bill
Bill
#16
E-Ray, 3LZ, ZER, LIFT
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: NE South Carolina
Posts: 29,498
Received 9,625 Likes
on
6,629 Posts
^^^
Hmm, and what is their magic design?? I was collecting ~1 oz of oil/1000 miles in a catch can in my Z51 that would have gone past the hot intake valves. Some of that would have baked on those hot intake valves. How much have no idea BUT it's what Tadge said is "only cosmetic!" He didn't say it was miraculously better. This is a quote from his Forum post:
"Granted, deposit formation on SIDI engine intake valves is greater than what is seen with PFI engines, but the Gen 5 engines a.re typical for SIDI engines, and in fact better than other SIDI engines we have benchmarked, (Note: he did not say which he benchmarked) So the bottom line is that we believe the carbon build up is only an internal cosmetic issue, not anything that will affect customers over the life of their cars."
I agree it has not been reported to cause a significant performance issue. However like some Vette owner's are paranoid and OCD about fingerprints on their car, those of us who have assembled engines, like the CNC ported heads in the 502 cid Chevy crate engine in my Street Rod and heads on NASCAR engines at Richard Petty's shop etc, I would not say they "solved the problem."
Others, like Toyota have engines that use both Port Injection and DI. The ZR1 has the same, but activated when max power is needed. Would not be surprized if the C8 engine has both! That is what I would call "solving the issue!"
Granted have that same "Catch Can" on my Grand Sport and GM spent a lot of effort for that "no problem" coking issue and have reduced what I am collecting to ~1/2 once/1000 miles. Bet they did not spend that time and engineering effort on a newer dry sump design for a non-problem! I do appreciate what they have accomplished with a low cost system compared to issues with early BMW DI engines that required walnut shell blasting!
Hmm, and what is their magic design?? I was collecting ~1 oz of oil/1000 miles in a catch can in my Z51 that would have gone past the hot intake valves. Some of that would have baked on those hot intake valves. How much have no idea BUT it's what Tadge said is "only cosmetic!" He didn't say it was miraculously better. This is a quote from his Forum post:
"Granted, deposit formation on SIDI engine intake valves is greater than what is seen with PFI engines, but the Gen 5 engines a.re typical for SIDI engines, and in fact better than other SIDI engines we have benchmarked, (Note: he did not say which he benchmarked) So the bottom line is that we believe the carbon build up is only an internal cosmetic issue, not anything that will affect customers over the life of their cars."
I agree it has not been reported to cause a significant performance issue. However like some Vette owner's are paranoid and OCD about fingerprints on their car, those of us who have assembled engines, like the CNC ported heads in the 502 cid Chevy crate engine in my Street Rod and heads on NASCAR engines at Richard Petty's shop etc, I would not say they "solved the problem."
Others, like Toyota have engines that use both Port Injection and DI. The ZR1 has the same, but activated when max power is needed. Would not be surprized if the C8 engine has both! That is what I would call "solving the issue!"
Granted have that same "Catch Can" on my Grand Sport and GM spent a lot of effort for that "no problem" coking issue and have reduced what I am collecting to ~1/2 once/1000 miles. Bet they did not spend that time and engineering effort on a newer dry sump design for a non-problem! I do appreciate what they have accomplished with a low cost system compared to issues with early BMW DI engines that required walnut shell blasting!
Last edited by JerryU; 07-11-2018 at 02:41 PM.
#17
Instructor
For what it’s worth, I just had a cam and heads package installed on my 2015 Z51 at 10,000 miles. The old intake valves and ports shown essentially no deposit at that mileage. I have an elite catch can and the total accumulation of liquid has been less than 6 ounces in 10,000 miles. My conclusion is that GM engineers have designed a pvc system that essentially makes deposits a non issue.
The following 4 users liked this post by lancelot1:
#19
E-Ray, 3LZ, ZER, LIFT
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: NE South Carolina
Posts: 29,498
Received 9,625 Likes
on
6,629 Posts
For what it’s worth, I just had a cam and heads package installed on my 2015 Z51 at 10,000 miles. The old intake valves and ports shown essentially no deposit at that mileage. I have an elite catch can and the total accumulation of liquid has been less than 6 ounces in 10,000 miles. My conclusion is that GM engineers have designed a pvc system that essentially makes deposits a non issue.
Now we need pics of someone who didn't have a can!
Last edited by JerryU; 07-11-2018 at 08:24 PM.