When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hello all, looking for opinions and experience here: I am stationed and live in Germany and wanted to save my pennies to buy a positive displacement supercharger but I spoke with Geiger Cars in Munich (huge american dealership with all high end cars Chevy, Ford, Dodge) and they said they used to supercharge the LT1 and sell but wont do it anymore because 5 out of 7 blew up. The contributed it to the fact of higher speeds here for longer periods of time. They said in he States "no problem" since the speeds are lower and only occasionally do we get higher speeds (racetrack). What are your thoughts?
BTW - Yes when I drive I am normally between 100-160 mph on the autobahn (where allowed and safe etc. etc)
You probably got good advice. Sustained high speed drives with a blown stock bottom end LT1 is gonna be risky. I would at least do pistons as a minimum. Rods and maybe even crank if you’re really gonna beat on it.
What would sustained high speeds do that you need to worry about the pistons more? As long as there is no detonation and heat is taken care of?
What horsepower were they pushing on the lt1?
I think the concern is likely the same as it is with most modern, low emission (smog) type engines. Tight ring clearances that end up causing a piston failure with sustained operation at much higher cylinder pressures than you had from the factory.
I don't know how common that is with boosted LT1s but I've seen it on enough modern cars of all makes that it would be my first concern with boosting one of these engines.
DOD = Displacement On Demand = 4 cylinder mode while cruising
You can eliminate it two ways , if you are cracking the motor open there is a kit you can buy and install to eliminate DOD and all its hardware or you can turn it off in the tune
A Diablo or a Range Device can turn it off in the tune easily
DCasole thanks for the clarification, however please correct me if I am wrong; mine is a Z51 manual 7 speed and should only go to 4 cylinder mode when I select ECO. Which I never do here
DCasole thanks for the clarification, however please correct me if I am wrong; mine is a Z51 manual 7 speed and should only go to 4 cylinder mode when I select ECO. Which I never do here
Yep u are correct if you have a manual it will not enter DOD unless in ECO
I see a lot of guys here running track days with boost on LT1's that would be much more intense than squirts in the autobahn.
@brunothemellow runs a procharger and he beats on his lt1 pretty hard from what he says
You can never be too sage, but like the OP says, bottom end is pricey, but so is blowing up the motor....
Autobahn is the worst by far. 100% throttle for several minutes, or 10's of minutes. On a track day you don't stay long full throttle, you always need to brake, mitigate throttle in the corners...
Hello all, looking for opinions and experience here: I am stationed and live in Germany and wanted to save my pennies to buy a positive displacement supercharger but I spoke with Geiger Cars in Munich (huge american dealership with all high end cars Chevy, Ford, Dodge) and they said they used to supercharge the LT1 and sell but wont do it anymore because 5 out of 7 blew up. The contributed it to the fact of higher speeds here for longer periods of time. They said in he States "no problem" since the speeds are lower and only occasionally do we get higher speeds (racetrack). What are your thoughts?
BTW - Yes when I drive I am normally between 100-160 mph on the autobahn (where allowed and safe etc. etc)
Geiger has been buying parts from us for 10 years so I would say they know their stuff. If you'd like a second opinion to confirm talk to Heinz at CCRP (CoolChevy Raceparts) in Austria. He's a well known performance shop/engine builder.
It is a different framework completely, when you are above 120mph and going between that and 150-160. Half the reason that some risky setups in the US work on these and other cars is that they sit in the garage not running. No risk there.
When you actually are going to use the car for more than 1/4 mile at a time, the requirements change.
They know what of they speak. Do you think GM spent all the money necessary to upgrade the Z for blown duty because they had nothing better to do with their resources. Check a listing of all the differences between the two C engines. :yesnod If not yet convinced, then do the same with any company that sells comparable blown and normally aspirated engines: