When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I’ve tried a couple times in second gear to get the most RPMs I can get before my shift to 3rd and have apparently hit the rev limiter because it cuts power. I’m going to make sure to not do it again, I’m just ticked off and worried that I may have caused some harm. What does ido if anything to the motor /drivetrain?
Accelerating up to, and hitting, the RPM limiter does not hurt anything. The limiter is simply doing its job to ensure the RPM does not climb any higher.
Accelerating up to, and hitting, the RPM limiter does not hurt anything. The limiter is simply doing its job to ensure the RPM does not climb any higher.
If so, it has noting to do with the RPMs reached by the engine.
You may have smelled a hot engine. Running the engine at WOT up to red line multiple times will put a bit of heat into the engine. This doe not hurt anything either.
Did you see the thread of the new GS that the guy blew the engine? GM is denying the warranty claim based on going into redline. Be careful what you post here. You don’t want to be in his shoes.
Did you see the thread of the new GS that the guy blew the engine? GM is denying the warranty claim based on going into redline. Be careful what you post here. You don’t want to be in his shoes.
They’re not denying his claim because he hit the rev limiter, he’s getting denied because on disassembly it was noted piston to valve collision. This was caused by a significant over rev due to a missed manual downshift. There is no rev limiter on downshifts for a manual.
As others have said, hitting the rev limiter is no issue.
Exactly. A missed downshift on a manual (for example, going from third to second at high RPM when a shift to fourth was intended - the engine ends up far, far over red line, damaging the valve train, etc.) is operator error/abuse not covered by warranty. Such a missed downshift is aptly named a money shift; it is money out of your pocket because the warranty will not cover it.
They’re not denying his claim because he hit the rev limiter, he’s getting denied because on disassembly it was noted piston to valve collision. This was caused by a significant over rev due to a missed manual downshift. There is no rev limiter on downshifts for a manual.
As others have said, hitting the rev limiter is no issue.
I get it but I believe he said there was no over rev due to a downshift. Of course that’s based on his word. My point is I would never post publically about anything related to over rev on an engine still in warranty. You’re asking for problems and we’re talking major $$ here.
Well... they aren’t saying it was a over rev because of piston valve contact. They would have downloaded the ECU data and seen the overrev, and be able to see exactly how hi it was reved.
it could also be a broken camshaft caused the contact with no overrev...
so so it depends.
Last edited by rrsperry; Jun 27, 2019 at 07:58 PM.
I get it but I believe he said there was no over rev due to a downshift. Of course that’s based on his word. My point is I would never post publically about anything related to over rev on an engine still in warranty. You’re asking for problems and we’re talking major $$ here.
I hate to be “that guy” that’s just arguing to argue but hitting the limiter is not an over rev. That limit literally exists to prevent such an occurrence.
Well... they aren’t saying it was a over rev because of piston valve contact. They would have downloaded the ECU data and seen the overrev, and be able to see exactly how hi it was reved.
it could also be a broken camshaft caused the contact with no overrev...
so so it depends.
The EDR records a few seconds of data, but never heard of the ECU recording lifetime high revs...
The actual rev limit of the engine is much higher than where the rev limiter holds engine revs, and the sock redline on pretty much any car is well within the safe range. I hit redline every once in a while when I don't shift quick enough, or when I try to carry more speed in turns when I can't yet shift, and it's no issue. I actually like C7 rev limiter since it's very gentle, and seems to be designed to not upset the car (handling) when it's hit.
The fun comes when you push the rev limiter in 3rd and 4th gears in an M7 car. Second gear is sort of lame. Rev limiter will get you 123 mph in 3rd and 152 mph in 4th. Although it seems if I push it close to the limit a lot it sort of moves up a couple hundred rpm over the period of track day. Have seen as much as 154 mph in 4th before hitting the limiter.
I actually like C7 rev limiter since it's very gentle, and seems to be designed to not upset the car (handling) when it's hit.
Good to know - thanks.
I generally try to avoid bouncing off the limiter because in other cars it can be pretty jarring. Not sure why because in any modern throttle-by-wire system the ECU could (should?) smoothly taper off the gas in those last few RPMs instead of banging right up against it.
Extended use of the rev limiter will definitely damage the valve train. No doubt about it. If you sat on the limiter for a tank of gas as someone mentioned you wouldn't see the end of the tank.
Depending on use of the car the limiter can be adjusted and tuned to be less aggressive. When we tune drag cars that build power all the way to the limiter we leave it more harsh as you don't want to take power away, but in tuning road race cars we start to close the throttle just before the limiter to make sure it is a softer transition into the limiter to not upset the balance and handling of the car. Also much easier on the valvetrain.
Extended use of the rev limiter will definitely damage the valve train.
Do we know this actually to be the case?
I expect the limiter to be set within the safe operating parameters of the engine, not set at an RPM that damages the valve train a bit every time you hit it.
I expect the limiter to be set within the safe operating parameters of the engine, not set at an RPM that damages the valve train a bit every time you hit it.
I think so, too. I remember at the time of LS7, there was a mention of a testing procedure where the engine was run at redline continually for 24 hours.
You could hold it on the limiter til it runs out of gas and it wouldn’t hurt anything. That’s what it’s for.....
Follow the above advice at your own risk lol. I saw a guy at Thunder Hill bounce off the limiter in 3rd gear every lap for a good hundred yards as he was to lazy to shift to 4th. He was under the impression it was fine. 3rd session he came in with a clanking so bad we all assumed the worst. Turns out he got lucky and only bent a single lifter. This was a stock LT1. So while you can get away with touching your redline, extended use has huge risk as It’s a safety gap not a tool. Your valve train is moving very fast and it’s not a good idea to keep accelerating to the limit, cut all power, then instantly accelerate to the limit and repeat, with lots of heat, and under extreme load. It’s fine to touch it but it’s definitely not meant to be used if you don’t have to. I try to avoid it at all cost as it means I messed up and made a mistake. Just like missing an apex, every thing needs to flow perfect. Killing drive sucks, killing your valve train sucks even more.
In 30 years of track life in one form or another, personally bouncing off the limit more times than I can count and I have only personally witnessed one failure. So it is rare and you have to be doing silly things. But when dealing with high speeds, metal and high heat, **** can happen.
Last edited by rb185afm; Jun 29, 2019 at 12:22 PM.