When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My vette spent three months in the shop having the front bumper and passenger fender repaired after hitting a deer. It was fully drivable, and still felt just as solid as ever when I handed it over to be repaired. As part of the repairs, the repair guy mentioned that he did a full four-wheel alignment. When I drove the car home, it felt different. When I drive over an odd bump in the road (an expansion joint, for example), the car feels "wobbly" in the back. Maybe a bit floaty is a better description. When I got home I took a look at the rear wheels and noticed that the whole axle seems off, like it is twisted a couple degrees from perpendicular. The rear passenger side tire is way closer to the front-side fender wall than the driver side, to the point that where you can see that the fender wall is being eaten by the tire when going over bumps. It is easy to conclude that the floaty feeling going over lumps in the road is caused by one rear tire hitting it just oh-so-slightly before the second one.
Could this be the result of the alignment process, or is there something else going on?
My vette spent three months in the shop having the front bumper and passenger fender repaired after hitting a deer. It was fully drivable, and still felt just as solid as ever when I handed it over to be repaired. As part of the repairs, the repair guy mentioned that he did a full four-wheel alignment. When I drove the car home, it felt different. When I drive over an odd bump in the road (an expansion joint, for example), the car feels "wobbly" in the back. Maybe a bit floaty is a better description. When I got home I took a look at the rear wheels and noticed that the whole axle seems off, like it is twisted a couple degrees from perpendicular. The rear passenger side tire is way closer to the front-side fender wall than the driver side, to the point that where you can see that the fender wall is being eaten by the tire when going over bumps. It is easy to conclude that the floaty feeling going over lumps in the road is caused by one rear tire hitting it just oh-so-slightly before the second one.
Could this be the result of the alignment process, or is there something else going on?
This is certainly not what we like to hear, Stingradius. Please know, customer satisfaction is extremely important to us. Our team would be more than happy to take a closer look into the concerns with your vehicle. To do so, please send an email to socialmedia@gm.com with ATTN: Stingradius/Corvette Forums in the subject line.
Please include your contact information, VIN, a brief description of your concern, and the name of your preferred dealership. We look forward to hearing from you. To learn more about GM’s Privacy Policy, please visit https://www.gm.com/privacy-statement.html. The information you provide may be monitored and recorded and is subject to the GM Privacy Statement.
Privacy Statement | General Motors
Your privacy is important to General Motors. This Privacy Statement addresses the personal information GM collects and how GM handles that personal information. www.gm.com
My vette spent three months in the shop having the front bumper and passenger fender repaired after hitting a deer. It was fully drivable, and still felt just as solid as ever when I handed it over to be repaired. As part of the repairs, the repair guy mentioned that he did a full four-wheel alignment. When I drove the car home, it felt different. When I drive over an odd bump in the road (an expansion joint, for example), the car feels "wobbly" in the back. Maybe a bit floaty is a better description. When I got home I took a look at the rear wheels and noticed that the whole axle seems off, like it is twisted a couple degrees from perpendicular. The rear passenger side tire is way closer to the front-side fender wall than the driver side, to the point that where you can see that the fender wall is being eaten by the tire when going over bumps. It is easy to conclude that the floaty feeling going over lumps in the road is caused by one rear tire hitting it just oh-so-slightly before the second one.
Could this be the result of the alignment process, or is there something else going on?
It sounds like your rear toe is off. The rear toe adjustment affects both the toe and thrust angle. If the shop mechanic didn't know about the rear caster adjustment I suspect that may be off as well. The alignment will have to be done over again. Take it back and have them redo the alignment while you are watching. Do you want to corner carve with the car or do you want to get great tire mileage? You can't have both so you need to determine what you want both front and rear caster and camber to be and have the shop get as close to 0 toe in front and rear as possible.
For tire mileage set the following:
Front Left Camber set to -0.6, Right Camber set to -0.6 set Cross Camber as close to 0 as possible. Front Left and Right Caster should be set to +7.5 with 0 Cross Caster. Set front toe to 0.0 degrees or maybe a shade toed in at 0.02 deg total toe.
Rear Left Camber set to -0.9 Right Camber set to -0.9 set Cross Camber as close to 0 as possible. Rear Left Caster set to 0.0 +/- 0.02 deg Right Caster set to 0.0 +/- 0.02 deg. Get the cross-caster as close to 0 as possible. Set the rear toe to 0.0 degrees or maybe 0.01 total deg and the thrust angle to 0.0 degrees.
Front Left Camber set to -0.6, Right Camber set to -0.6 set Cross Camber as close to 0 as possible. Front Left and Right Caster should be set to +7.5 with 0 Cross Caster. Set front toe to 0.0 degrees or maybe a shade toed in at 0.02 deg total toe.
Rear Left Camber set to -0.9 Right Camber set to -0.9 set Cross Camber as close to 0 as possible. Rear Left Caster set to 0.0 +/- 0.02 deg Right Caster set to 0.0 +/- 0.02 deg. Get the cross-caster as close to 0 as possible. Set the rear toe to 0.0 degrees or maybe 0.01 total deg and the thrust angle to 0.0 degrees.
Bill
Bill, So I've been using the DSC specs for street/ occasional track since 2016 on my Z51 M7 which sees only 3 track events/year. Over the years I've modified it a bit. Stock suspension with no shims removed.
At the front I'm running -1.2 camber with 0.0 toe and max caster.
At the rear camber is the same at -1.2 with very small toe in for stability and rear caster set at +0.7. It feels comfortable to me on street and occasional track.
New DSC spec calls for rear castor at 0.0, same as GM spec, but also indicates its for use with their DSC controller. I am stock.
Much more than-1.2 camber would increase tire wear on the street and some rear toe-in, seems to me, has always been the rule for IRS cars.
Question for me is where should i have the shop set the rear caster? +0.7 original spec or +0.0 latest spec?
I respect your opinion/experience and appreciate the knowledge you bring to this forum
Update: I took it to another alignment shop and the consensus is that the rear is aligned dead-on. Everyone is stumped. There is nothing visibly wrong with the cradle or control arms. We spent three hours under it with a tape measure and flashlights to no avail. I guess the next step is to start taking it all apart to see if there's anything cracked or bent that we can't see with everything put together.
Edit: Just saw the camber/caster comments above. I'll make sure to take these numbers back. Thank you.
Update: Problem solved. Took it to a different alignment shop that had a guy with 40 years experience. He fixed it right up. Didn't cost me a penny, either, as the body shop guy felt so bad about the first screw up. Installed new fender wall liners, too, for free.
Originally Posted by Stingradius;[url=tel:1606344800
1606344800[/url]]Update: Problem solved. Took it to a different alignment shop that had a guy with 40 years experience. He fixed it right up. Didn't cost me a penny, either, as the body shop guy felt so bad about the first screw up. Installed new fender wall liners, too, for free.
Question for Bill... why do you recommend -0.9 deg camber in the rear and less in the front? My experience has always been that you need a bit more camber in front than rear because front tires need to wear the outer edges due to steering. This is for street driven cars, not track driving.