When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Are the catch cans needed? What are the pro and cons of using them? Any recommended models/makers or additional information that may help someone make an informed decision.
There was a very detailed engineering explanation why adding a catch can was not a good idea unless you did all the needed engineering and modifications the keep the vacuum inside the crank case the same.
A lot of restrictions in the vacuum flow due to all the extra hoses and canister.
The article was posted here in CF, lots of technical details. Try to look it up.
Basically the manufactures of catch cans would have to make hundreds of different models with associate PCV parts for all the different models and set ups to maintain proper scavenging of the crank case. Way too expensive so one size fits all?!!!
Thats why I took my catch can off, can't argue with the math.
Cars haven't needed them for 60+ years......... Whatever gets in the intake as the pic posted, is designed to be that way. I have never seen a documented case where an engine catch can saved an engine from anything. You can't quantify effect unless you have accurate data on each end & a control.
With that said I do have one. I got it cheap used & it looks good.
From: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03 thru '25
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran
I had one on my C5s and have one on my current C7. Mine is from Elite Engineering. Is it necessary, perhaps not but it does catch some oil that would otherwise go into the intake. I bought mine used and at a good price so for now I will continue to use it.
Discussion started out just like this one and the arguments started. Finally someone with a mechanical background (ME) went into great detail what is involved and why.
I could not find any part of his post that I found to be incorrect. ie: he knows what he was talking about.
If I were you I'd try really hard to find and read his reply to this question.
Here is a link to that discussion (one of the main ones). I had purchased an Elite catch can and installed it. Yes, I had caught a small amount of oil which made me feel good about the purchase. But I subsequently removed it after doing more research about the negative effects I could introduce by adding something to a deliberately designed system. For reference my car is a stock 2016 Z51 so it has the dry sump which is discussed in the thread.
The addition of a forced induction system would require a different discussion and set of testing parameters depending on the application.
Last edited by Flattman; Feb 19, 2025 at 04:58 PM.
Everybody gets to make their own decision for their vehicles. I have installed J&L catch cans on 3 different vehicles & they all will have about 1/8 inch of fluid in the can after 1 year when I empty them (as part of oil change procedure).
I have a built LS2..NA...530 rwhp....1998 TA M6.
Engine builder installed a catch can.
And a 2016 Z06 A8 LT4 416 stroker...1000 rwhp...with 2650 Maggie, meth & catch can.
Different engine builders, that believe in catch cans.
My stock engines do not have a catch can.
YMMV.
Everybody gets to make their own decision for their vehicles. I have installed J&L catch cans on 3 different vehicles & they all will have about 1/8 inch of fluid in the can after 1 year when I empty them (as part of oil change procedure).
As said, to each their own.
Best wishes to all.
1 yr, but how many miles?
1/8" after 500 miles would be excessive, but a 5k, it would be insignificant.
Really, spend the time to read the article, if you can find it.
In a nutshell:
The addition of a catch can with no modifications to the vacuum system to maintain the proper flow of vapor resulted in slower vapor flow and lower crank case pressure thus creating larger oil molecules which would then be caught in a catch can, thats what you are seeing, and filter media inside the can added to this sisutation. So you would have to modify the system to maintain the correct vapor flow and crank case pressure and molecule size.
If all this was properly done I suspect you would not see any abnormal amount of oil in the catch can making it irrelevant.
Way too much R&D and testing, not to mention $$$ to achieve the desired results. If it was simple, cheap and needed all cars would have them.
Some extremely high performance super cars do have them but they are engineered and developed to operate properly maintaining proper crank case pressure and vapor flow.