New GM super charger patent pending 12-5-13
#1
Race Director
Thread Starter
New GM super charger patent pending 12-5-13
#4
Melting Slicks
I think this is game changing. I agree with you on that too. This new motor is going to be an absolute technological marvel making insane power with high efficiency. It will turn the NA people into believers.
Last edited by WeaponsGradeTorque; 12-05-2013 at 10:39 PM.
#5
Le Mans Master
Centri would be much better than PD so I am excited again!
#6
Team Owner
Centri like that may not be any better than a PD. The issues isn't the rotors for heat soak, but the small intercoolers and water system used. You won't be able to run a large air/air with that, it would have a similar intercooler to a PD.
#7
Melting Slicks
Ok, then why do you suppose GM went with type of S/C instead of what they did on the ZR1? Guess we will find out soon. I am very interested to see the results.
#8
Le Mans Master
That looks very very cool, that being said there is a big difference in power delivery with centi vs PD, some people like one, some the other, I can't wait to see the results , on paper it looks like a extremely high tech version(obviously) of what Paxton uses on carb cars.... Very exciting
#9
Drifting
#10
Melting Slicks
So, if its driven off the crank directly, I guess that would eliminate belt slip... And, would also eliminate the ease of changing a pulley to increase boost.. Which is bad for hotrodders, but great for OEM warranties I suppose.
#11
What makes anyone think this patent has a thing to do with the lt4?
#12
Le Mans Master
No centri's suffer from belt slip as well, pulley change is just as easy.
#13
Le Mans Master
#14
Melting Slicks
Good question. How hard is it going to be to turn up the boost for aftermarket upgrades?
#15
Drifting
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is very likely that the set up shown in this patent will NOT have an intercooler. A DI engine does not require an intercooler to keep a combustionable mixture from combusting. There is no combustional mixture until combustion is desired. At that point the fuel is injected directly into the cylinder and ignition initiated by the sparkplug. For an example, look at the McLaren twin turbo V8. No intercooler. Lots of hp from 3.8 ltrs, about 231 ci.
#16
Le Mans Master
It is very likely that the set up shown in this patent will NOT have an intercooler. A DI engine does not require an intercooler to keep a combustionable mixture from combusting. There is no combustional mixture until combustion is desired. At that point the fuel is injected directly into the cylinder and ignition initiated by the sparkplug. For an example, look at the McLaren twin turbo V8. No intercooler. Lots of hp from 3.8 ltrs, about 231 ci.
Having the blower sitting on top of the motor will create a ton of heat, if you look at the intercoolers of the Zr1 you can see from the inside that the fins break away from all the heat.
It will have an intercooler or Chevy will have big problems, detination being the biggest problem.
#17
Safety Car
Exactly. Furthermore, remember the leaked boost gauge?
Looks like TVS not centri.
It also seems to redline at 7.5 psi or so. This is more in line with 605 to 620hp estimates not 660hp. 660hp would require ~10.5 psi, ZR1 like, and forged internals.
Maybe the reason the blower looks so thin is because this is the smaller TVS 1900 that goes on the Z06. Combine that with the taller heads for DI and it seems very small in height.
Compare to ZR1:
Looks like TVS not centri.
It also seems to redline at 7.5 psi or so. This is more in line with 605 to 620hp estimates not 660hp. 660hp would require ~10.5 psi, ZR1 like, and forged internals.
Maybe the reason the blower looks so thin is because this is the smaller TVS 1900 that goes on the Z06. Combine that with the taller heads for DI and it seems very small in height.
Compare to ZR1:
Last edited by SBC_and_a_stick; 12-25-2013 at 04:57 AM.
#18
Melting Slicks
Also, you have no way to know what boost would be required to reach 660 HP without knowing all the other specs of the engine such as displacement and efficiency of the entire setup.
#19
Burning Brakes
It is very likely that the set up shown in this patent will NOT have an intercooler. A DI engine does not require an intercooler to keep a combustionable mixture from combusting. There is no combustional mixture until combustion is desired. At that point the fuel is injected directly into the cylinder and ignition initiated by the sparkplug. For an example, look at the McLaren twin turbo V8. No intercooler. Lots of hp from 3.8 ltrs, about 231 ci.
#20
Drifting
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts