C7 Z06 Discussion General Z06 Corvette Discussion, LT4 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: GEM Motorsports

New GM super charger patent pending 12-5-13

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2013, 09:37 PM
  #1  
rcallen484
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
rcallen484's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,355
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default New GM super charger patent pending 12-5-13

See this thread:

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c7-g...plication.html
Old 12-05-2013, 10:18 PM
  #2  
WeaponsGradeTorque
Melting Slicks
 
WeaponsGradeTorque's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Odenton MD
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Just saw this. Very interesting.
Old 12-05-2013, 10:26 PM
  #3  
rcallen484
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
rcallen484's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,355
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WeaponsGradeTorque
Just saw this. Very interesting.
Could be a real game changer if that thing solves the heat soak issue.
Old 12-05-2013, 10:36 PM
  #4  
WeaponsGradeTorque
Melting Slicks
 
WeaponsGradeTorque's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Odenton MD
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rcallen484
Could be a real game changer if that thing solves the heat soak issue.
I was thinking the exact same thing. A centri+V8 is a perfect combination.


I think this is game changing. I agree with you on that too. This new motor is going to be an absolute technological marvel making insane power with high efficiency. It will turn the NA people into believers.

Last edited by WeaponsGradeTorque; 12-05-2013 at 10:39 PM.
Old 12-06-2013, 10:21 AM
  #5  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Centri would be much better than PD so I am excited again!
Old 12-06-2013, 10:40 AM
  #6  
Unreal
Team Owner
 
Unreal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Gilbert AZ
Posts: 24,035
Received 2,313 Likes on 1,793 Posts

Default

Centri like that may not be any better than a PD. The issues isn't the rotors for heat soak, but the small intercoolers and water system used. You won't be able to run a large air/air with that, it would have a similar intercooler to a PD.
Old 12-07-2013, 11:36 PM
  #7  
WeaponsGradeTorque
Melting Slicks
 
WeaponsGradeTorque's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Odenton MD
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Unreal
Centri like that may not be any better than a PD. The issues isn't the rotors for heat soak, but the small intercoolers and water system used. You won't be able to run a large air/air with that, it would have a similar intercooler to a PD.
Ok, then why do you suppose GM went with type of S/C instead of what they did on the ZR1? Guess we will find out soon. I am very interested to see the results.
Old 12-08-2013, 12:23 AM
  #8  
NytmereZ
Le Mans Master
 
NytmereZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 1999
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 5,036
Received 295 Likes on 161 Posts

Default

That looks very very cool, that being said there is a big difference in power delivery with centi vs PD, some people like one, some the other, I can't wait to see the results , on paper it looks like a extremely high tech version(obviously) of what Paxton uses on carb cars.... Very exciting
Old 12-08-2013, 02:57 AM
  #9  
Corvettinator
Drifting
 
Corvettinator's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2011
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 1,606
Received 34 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WeaponsGradeTorque
Ok, then why do you suppose GM went with type of S/C instead of what they did on the ZR1? Guess we will find out soon. I am very interested to see the results.
Better powerband.
Old 12-22-2013, 08:13 PM
  #10  
ChevyChad
Melting Slicks
 
ChevyChad's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2002
Location: Savannah GA
Posts: 2,618
Received 1,299 Likes on 529 Posts

Default

So, if its driven off the crank directly, I guess that would eliminate belt slip... And, would also eliminate the ease of changing a pulley to increase boost.. Which is bad for hotrodders, but great for OEM warranties I suppose.
Old 12-22-2013, 09:57 PM
  #11  
ChucksZ06
Drifting
 
ChucksZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,356
Received 55 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

What makes anyone think this patent has a thing to do with the lt4?
Old 12-23-2013, 08:33 AM
  #12  
NytmereZ
Le Mans Master
 
NytmereZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 1999
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 5,036
Received 295 Likes on 161 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChevyChad
So, if its driven off the crank directly, I guess that would eliminate belt slip... And, would also eliminate the ease of changing a pulley to increase boost.. Which is bad for hotrodders, but great for OEM warranties I suppose.
No centri's suffer from belt slip as well, pulley change is just as easy.
Old 12-23-2013, 08:36 AM
  #13  
NytmereZ
Le Mans Master
 
NytmereZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 1999
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 5,036
Received 295 Likes on 161 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rcallen484
Could be a real game changer if that thing solves the heat soak issue.
All forced induction suffer from heat soak its just a fact, all you can do is help minimize it via better intercooling, meth does a great job when combined with a good intercooling system.
Old 12-23-2013, 10:25 AM
  #14  
WeaponsGradeTorque
Melting Slicks
 
WeaponsGradeTorque's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Odenton MD
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChevyChad
So, if its driven off the crank directly, I guess that would eliminate belt slip... And, would also eliminate the ease of changing a pulley to increase boost.. Which is bad for hotrodders, but great for OEM warranties I suppose.

Good question. How hard is it going to be to turn up the boost for aftermarket upgrades?
Old 12-24-2013, 06:27 PM
  #15  
I Bin Therbefor
Drifting
 
I Bin Therbefor's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It is very likely that the set up shown in this patent will NOT have an intercooler. A DI engine does not require an intercooler to keep a combustionable mixture from combusting. There is no combustional mixture until combustion is desired. At that point the fuel is injected directly into the cylinder and ignition initiated by the sparkplug. For an example, look at the McLaren twin turbo V8. No intercooler. Lots of hp from 3.8 ltrs, about 231 ci.
Old 12-24-2013, 08:01 PM
  #16  
NytmereZ
Le Mans Master
 
NytmereZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 1999
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 5,036
Received 295 Likes on 161 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by I Bin Therbefor
It is very likely that the set up shown in this patent will NOT have an intercooler. A DI engine does not require an intercooler to keep a combustionable mixture from combusting. There is no combustional mixture until combustion is desired. At that point the fuel is injected directly into the cylinder and ignition initiated by the sparkplug. For an example, look at the McLaren twin turbo V8. No intercooler. Lots of hp from 3.8 ltrs, about 231 ci.
There is no way it won't have an intercooler, also you cannot look at Mclaren which is a million dollar car and do a comparo.
Having the blower sitting on top of the motor will create a ton of heat, if you look at the intercoolers of the Zr1 you can see from the inside that the fins break away from all the heat.
It will have an intercooler or Chevy will have big problems, detination being the biggest problem.
Old 12-25-2013, 04:29 AM
  #17  
SBC_and_a_stick
Safety Car
 
SBC_and_a_stick's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2012
Location: North California
Posts: 4,737
Received 551 Likes on 311 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChucksZ06
What makes anyone think this patent has a thing to do with the lt4?
Exactly. Furthermore, remember the leaked boost gauge?


Looks like TVS not centri.

It also seems to redline at 7.5 psi or so. This is more in line with 605 to 620hp estimates not 660hp. 660hp would require ~10.5 psi, ZR1 like, and forged internals.

Maybe the reason the blower looks so thin is because this is the smaller TVS 1900 that goes on the Z06. Combine that with the taller heads for DI and it seems very small in height.

Compare to ZR1:

Last edited by SBC_and_a_stick; 12-25-2013 at 04:57 AM.

Get notified of new replies

To New GM super charger patent pending 12-5-13

Old 12-25-2013, 09:32 AM
  #18  
ChevyChad
Melting Slicks
 
ChevyChad's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2002
Location: Savannah GA
Posts: 2,618
Received 1,299 Likes on 529 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NytmereZ
No centri's suffer from belt slip as well, pulley change is just as easy.
I know all about conventional centrifugal superchargers. I have tons of experience with them. The way this patent describes this new style though is completely different. Did you even look at the patent this thread is describing? It's a centrifugal compressor driven off a direct drive shaft from the crank that is vertical and resides in the valley of the engine. No belts, no pulleys.


Originally Posted by SBC_and_a_stick
....
It also seems to redline at 7.5 psi or so. This is more in line with 605 to 620hp estimates not 660hp. 660hp would require ~10.5 psi, ZR1 like, and forged internals....
How do you know where redline is? Are you just guessing as a percentage of how far the gauge goes (up to 12psi)? Don't forget that these gauge clusters are digital, and that "12" could be changed to any other number very easily. It's not like it's printed on.

Also, you have no way to know what boost would be required to reach 660 HP without knowing all the other specs of the engine such as displacement and efficiency of the entire setup.
Old 12-25-2013, 10:03 AM
  #19  
MX621
Burning Brakes
 
MX621's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: smyrna de
Posts: 972
Received 52 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by I Bin Therbefor
It is very likely that the set up shown in this patent will NOT have an intercooler. A DI engine does not require an intercooler to keep a combustionable mixture from combusting. There is no combustional mixture until combustion is desired. At that point the fuel is injected directly into the cylinder and ignition initiated by the sparkplug. For an example, look at the McLaren twin turbo V8. No intercooler. Lots of hp from 3.8 ltrs, about 231 ci.
The McLaren does indeed have a water to air intercooler.. its a mechanical pump driven off the water pump for the engine.
Old 12-25-2013, 12:11 PM
  #20  
I Bin Therbefor
Drifting
 
I Bin Therbefor's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MX621
The McLaren does indeed have a water to air intercooler.. its a mechanical pump driven off the water pump for the engine.
Not only that but it doesn't have DI

I really got that one mixed up


Quick Reply: New GM super charger patent pending 12-5-13



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 AM.