C7 Z06 Discussion General Z06 Corvette Discussion, LT4 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: GEM Motorsports
View Poll Results: If you've Overheated What is Your Stage Aero 1, 2 or 3
Stage 1 Aero
22.70%
Stage 2 Aero
20.98%
Stage 3 Aero
56.32%
Voters: 348. You may not vote on this poll

ZO6 overheating issues ***MEGA Merge***

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2014, 02:42 PM
  #1061  
Steve Snake Driver
Melting Slicks<br><img src="/forums/images/ranks/3k-4k.gif" border="0">
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Steve Snake Driver's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: Enterprise AL
Posts: 3,056
Received 275 Likes on 150 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NineBall
Those who are concerned, should be asking the tuner shops that post in this section about how well the C7Z dynos once it gets hot. Say, doing 3-4 consecutive dyno pulls without turning off the engine or letting it cool. They are so focused on the max (cool) numbers to share with you, but they aren't mentioning the hot numbers. Two local guys, one dropped 20 rwhp, the other dropped 28 rwhp. I wonder what the other shops are finding, but won't talk about.
Originally Posted by sdtoothdoc View Post
Great work over there guys. Have you noticed any reduction in power with back to back runs...any issues noted?
As you can see from the graph we are having no issues with power reduction... We made three pulls back to back to back and actually made more power with each pull


That being said, we are obviously not working with the OE calibration file.
Vengence Racing
Old 12-17-2014, 02:47 PM
  #1062  
21STCENTURYMUSCLECAR
Premium Supporting Vendor
 
21STCENTURYMUSCLECAR's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: Addison TX
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NineBall
Those who are concerned, should be asking the tuner shops that post in this section about how well the C7Z dynos once it gets hot. Say, doing 3-4 consecutive dyno pulls without turning off the engine or letting it cool. They are so focused on the max (cool) numbers to share with you, but they aren't mentioning the hot numbers. Two local guys, one dropped 20 rwhp, the other dropped 28 rwhp. I wonder what the other shops are finding, but won't talk about.
1st pull at 170 degrees coolant 568 rwhp
3rd pull without cool down/203 degrees coolant 549 rwhp

Not suprising and definitely not just a C7 Z06 issue as most every supercharged car and most NA GM cars lose 2-5% est. after 3 back to back dyno pulls
Old 12-17-2014, 02:49 PM
  #1063  
rocknroller
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
rocknroller's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Location: Mission, Kansas
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 9157
I love all these experts that don't own a Z06 give their opinion!
Huh? Sounds like a lot of good, calm discussion going on in this thread. Most are in wait and see mode and have stated that.
Old 12-17-2014, 02:51 PM
  #1064  
3 Z06ZR1
Team Owner
 
3 Z06ZR1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: salem OR
Posts: 20,936
Received 900 Likes on 742 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 9157
I love all these experts that don't own a Z06 give their opinion!
Owning a Z06 does not make "one an expert"!
Are the stories not true? Here's the chance for the "actual owners" to speak up! Let's run your Z06 with my ZR1 for some three honk action! I hear tons of people opinion's on those too and they never been in one.

I figure if I just get a mint shape used Turbo S the ***** contest is over.
(I like to buy used more car for the dollar) Those cars come out hard then manage to out run about anything!
Old 12-17-2014, 02:54 PM
  #1065  
Ultimate Z06
Instructor
 
Ultimate Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2011
Location: Findlay Ohio
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Calmer discussion than many threads. I too appreciate the rational discussion.
Old 12-17-2014, 02:56 PM
  #1066  
3 Z06ZR1
Team Owner
 
3 Z06ZR1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: salem OR
Posts: 20,936
Received 900 Likes on 742 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 21STCENTURYMUSCLECAR
1st pull at 170 degrees coolant 568 rwhp
3rd pull without cool down/203 degrees coolant 549 rwhp

Not suprising and definitely not just a C7 Z06 issue as most every supercharged car and most NA GM cars lose 2-5% est. after 3 back to back dyno pulls
I tend to see the 568 as the closer to the real number.
The 595 number we saw is one happy dyno.
So the rest of the numbers are too!
then after 3 pulls it's ZR1 numbers with C7's the extra weigh and
drag.
Old 12-17-2014, 02:59 PM
  #1067  
3 Z06ZR1
Team Owner
 
3 Z06ZR1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: salem OR
Posts: 20,936
Received 900 Likes on 742 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ufaj26


I'm still in the break in mode. coming from a ZR1 this is something that GM can certainly fix at their expense. To tune a brand new car and void warranty makes no sense to me personally.
I see them fixing it on a 2016 "IF" they fix anything.
This years car. No.
Old 12-17-2014, 03:03 PM
  #1068  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 21STCENTURYMUSCLECAR
1st pull at 170 degrees coolant 568 rwhp
3rd pull without cool down/203 degrees coolant 549 rwhp

Not suprising and definitely not just a C7 Z06 issue as most every supercharged car and most NA GM cars lose 2-5% est. after 3 back to back dyno pulls
I was under the impression that the "normal" coolant temp on the street was 220 degrees on the C7.

How does doing dyno pulls at 170 degrees and 203 degrees reflect the horsepower when doing real world driving(or doing multiple pulls on the highway) with the coolant running 220+?

My 2009 Z06 runs 192, right on the thermostat's setting. I seem to remember that the PCM doesn't start pulling timing until the coolant temp reaches 213 degrees

At what coolant temp does the C7 Z06 start pulling timing?

Last edited by JoesC5; 12-17-2014 at 03:19 PM.
Old 12-17-2014, 03:12 PM
  #1069  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 3 Z06ZR1
I tend to see the 568 as the closer to the real number.
The 595 number we saw is one happy dyno.
So the rest of the numbers are too!
then after 3 pulls it's ZR1 numbers with C7's the extra weigh and
drag.
Yep. The typical 12% driveline loss found on C5/6/7's with manual transmissions would give you 572HP at the wheels. So far we've seen a 572 pull, a 573 pull, a 568 pull and one "happy" 585 pull. I wonder who's the odd man in those pulls?

ZR1 with 12% driveline loss is 561HP and that is reflective of what they dyno. Not the 530HP that the same shop that posted the 585HP for the C7 Z06.

Last edited by JoesC5; 12-17-2014 at 03:19 PM.
Old 12-17-2014, 03:17 PM
  #1070  
dvandentop
Race Director
 
dvandentop's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 14,697
Received 583 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 3 Z06ZR1

I see them fixing it on a 2016 "IF" they fix anything.
This years car. No.
If they do change a tune on the 2016. The previous year should be allowed to flash it with no warranty implications imho.
Old 12-17-2014, 03:52 PM
  #1071  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dvandentop
If they do change a tune on the 2016. The previous year should be allowed to flash it with no warranty implications imho.
Derek,

What was the coolant temp running on your drive home from Springfield?
Old 12-17-2014, 04:50 PM
  #1072  
dar02081961
Melting Slicks
 
dar02081961's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,398
Received 845 Likes on 497 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 3 Z06ZR1
I tend to see the 568 as the closer to the real number.
The 595 number we saw is one happy dyno.
So the rest of the numbers are too!
then after 3 pulls it's ZR1 numbers with C7's the extra weigh and
drag.
Not exactly. The hp numbers may end up near the ZR1. But what you failed to acknowledge is they also said this is typical of all "supercharged cars". Therefore the figure you refer to for the ZR1 would be diminished as well.

Regardless using the diminished Z06 numbers compared to the 561 number for the ZR1 you are still missing about 50ftlb of tq in the ZR1. Which will more than offset the weight penalty for the Z06.

These cars should perform roughly the same with the Z06 being slightly quicker out of the whole or corners because of its tq advantage. Once at higher RPMs the cars are nearly identical and should hold position. This is if you believe only the Z06 loses power. If you believe they both lose power then the nod certainly goes to the Z06.
Old 12-17-2014, 07:58 PM
  #1073  
Northern33
8th Gear
 
Northern33's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2014
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Preference

It's all purely preference. It's like asking what the best colour is.

I currently own a 2014 911 C4S, but have a Z06 on order. I spent 5 days recently at the Springmountain Motorports park driving the C7's. The experience was impressive enough to go down the road in getting a C7 Z06, but they are very different cars.

Porsche makes an incredibly well built, ergonomically correct fun car to drive! I constantly find excuses to drive the car. The PDK transmission far exceeds my expectations. It is a smooth and deceptively fast car considering it only has 400HP. The grip will put a smile on your face every time you have a chance to test it. That being said; they are not cheap! Every option is overpriced.

The reason I decided on the Z06 was the amount of fun it is per $$ based on the fun I had tracking a C7 in September. The plan is to keep the Porsche when the Z06 eventually arrives. I can see the Porsche being the car for longer trips...

Good luck in your decision. They are both great cars, you cannot lose either way!

Last edited by Northern33; 12-17-2014 at 09:53 PM.
Old 12-17-2014, 08:21 PM
  #1074  
Foxer55
Drifting
 
Foxer55's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 1,578
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 3 Z06ZR1
I see them fixing it on a 2016 "IF" they fix anything.
This years car. No.
Possibly but I think they may ignore it. They have the 80% solution with this car and may not go for the 100% solution.
Old 12-17-2014, 08:34 PM
  #1075  
Dag Skagney
Instructor
 
Dag Skagney's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2010
Location: Great State of Texas
Posts: 202
Received 13 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

The plan is to keep the Porsche when the Z06 eventually arrives.

That's what I'm talkin bout....One of each...................
Old 12-17-2014, 08:42 PM
  #1076  
SBC_and_a_stick
Safety Car
 
SBC_and_a_stick's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2012
Location: North California
Posts: 4,737
Received 551 Likes on 311 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Foxer55
Possibly but I think they may ignore it. They have the 80% solution with this car and may not go for the 100% solution.
A C6 Grand Sport is for sure less than 80% of a C6 Z06. That didn't bother you before. A C6 Z06 is only 80% of a C7 Z06.

Why does it bother you now that the C7 Z06 has only 99% of its cold weather performance when hot?
Old 12-17-2014, 08:47 PM
  #1077  
Skullbussa
Pro
 
Skullbussa's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Posts: 690
Received 182 Likes on 76 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SBC_and_a_stick
A C6 Grand Sport is for sure less than 80% of a C6 Z06. That didn't bother you before. A C6 Z06 is only 80% of a C7 Z06.

Why does it bother you now that the C7 Z06 has only 99% of its cold weather performance when hot?
This is an absurd argument. I don't think Foxer55 would expect to get 100% of the performance in the snow either.

There is no precedent for a car so heavily marketed as having x amount of hp and y amount of torque that can only deliver that power for short bursts of time.

GM will fix this, I have faith in them. But burying your head in the sand and making ridiculous excuses for what is happening now does NOBODY any service.

Get notified of new replies

To ZO6 overheating issues ***MEGA Merge***

Old 12-17-2014, 08:59 PM
  #1078  
Greg Quillen
Pro
 
Greg Quillen's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2013
Posts: 686
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Temps when they were testing the A8 trans..

Name:  temps RA.jpg
Views: 1742
Size:  35.3 KB
Old 12-17-2014, 09:04 PM
  #1079  
SBC_and_a_stick
Safety Car
 
SBC_and_a_stick's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2012
Location: North California
Posts: 4,737
Received 551 Likes on 311 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Skullbussa
This is an absurd argument. I don't think Foxer55 would expect to get 100% of the performance in the snow either.

There is no precedent for a car so heavily marketed as having x amount of hp and y amount of torque that can only deliver that power for short bursts of time.

GM will fix this, I have faith in them. But burying your head in the sand and making ridiculous excuses for what is happening now does NOBODY any service.
100% of the performance of the engine? Without getting into continuous distribution discussions and the probability of a discrete event, yes, why not? Listen to what you are saying.

You concluded the Z06 is broken now? Show me your evidence. I just think you have nothing to show for your claims. Do you expect GM to recall a vehicle because one journalist found a small fault with it and nobody was able to replicate it?

When you hear a squeak and you take your car to the dealer, do they fix it without replicating the squeak?

Show me the Z06 is broken. You have no concrete evidence.
Old 12-17-2014, 09:18 PM
  #1080  
dvandentop
Race Director
 
dvandentop's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 14,697
Received 583 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5
Derek,

What was the coolant temp running on your drive home from Springfield?
sorry dont recall


Quick Reply: ZO6 overheating issues ***MEGA Merge***



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20 PM.