When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I think I happened to stumble onto some information that pertains to this subject. I was reading my latest issue of Grassroots Motorsports. They are doing a Camaro road course car build and are experiencing 300 degree oil temperatures with their LS3.
They called somebody at powertrain engineering about this and he gave them an interesting response: engine oil temperatures are not measured, they are calculated based on a complicated algorithm with many variables.
I am thinking that if the LS3 is designed this way, then almost certainly the LT1 and the Z06 engine use similar technology. Has anybody else heard this?
I was a little blown away by this information. If you had something wrong with the engine, would this mean that a real high oil temperature might not show up because the ECU expects everything to be working normally? And what if the calculations are not entirely accurate? Maybe your oil is not really hitting 300. Maybe they put in a fudge-factor to encourage you to back off for longevity's sake.
Has somebody installed a direct reading temperature gage to verify the factory supplied information?
That seems very surprising, as measuring temperature is one of the easiest things to do, just put in a temperature sensor and connect it to the ECU, and measure temperature directly. Can't imagine why they would not simply use a temperature sensor. They don't measure tire temperature directly since the TPMS sensors don't give air temperature readings, and they use an algorithm to get tire temperature from other data, but oil and coolant temperature are surely measured directly.
That seems very surprising, as measuring temperature is one of the easiest things to do, just put in a temperature sensor and connect it to the ECU, and measure temperature directly. Can't imagine why they would not simply use a temperature sensor. They don't measure tire temperature directly since the TPMS sensors don't give air temperature readings, and they use an algorithm to get tire temperature from other data, but oil and coolant temperature are surely measured directly.
If I had a car that was routinely seeing over 300 oil temperature, I would want to know for sure. Somebody out there should tap into the oil supply with a direct reading gauge. Somebody should ask Tadge if the information I presented is accurate.
I think I happened to stumble onto some information that pertains to this subject. I was reading my latest issue of Grassroots Motorsports. They are doing a Camaro road course car build and are experiencing 300 degree oil temperatures with their LS3.
They called somebody at powertrain engineering about this and he gave them an interesting response: engine oil temperatures are not measured, they are calculated based on a complicated algorithm with many variables.
I am thinking that if the LS3 is designed this way, then almost certainly the LT1 and the Z06 engine use similar technology. Has anybody else heard this?
I was a little blown away by this information. If you had something wrong with the engine, would this mean that a real high oil temperature might not show up because the ECU expects everything to be working normally? And what if the calculations are not entirely accurate? Maybe your oil is not really hitting 300. Maybe they put in a fudge-factor to encourage you to back off for longevity's sake.
Has somebody installed a direct reading temperature gage to verify the factory supplied information?
In the dry-sump C6 cars (GS, Z06, ZR1) there are 2 temperature sensors. The oil temp displayed in the DIC corresponds to the oil in dry sump reservoir, but if you have a ODBii reader you can pull PID 221154 (Hex Vale: 35FE2) which shows oil temp at/in the engine which is usually a few degrees different.
IMO, I could be wrong but I don't think either of those temperatures are based on computer modeling.
OP, can you post a link to the tech article. I've been unable to find it using Google. I would like to read the article myself so that I see the comments in context.
[QUOTE=truth.b;1590291157]OP, can you post a link to the tech article. I've been unable to find it using Google. I would like to read the article myself so that I see the comments in context.[/QUOTE
GrassRootsMotorsports.com is the best I can give you. I find it to be a good source of information, especially if you are looking for a performance tire; they do frequent comparison tests with timed lapping which I don't often see elsewhere. October 2015 issue, page 122.
if they use a thermocouple sensor, they will use an algorithm to calculate the temp. because they don't have a linear response. every degree change does not mean the same voltage change. Maybe this is what they meant.
"We had a chat and exchanged some emails with one of their powertrain engineers and learned some interesting stuff. First, the oil temp gauge in the center cluster isn't actually measuring oil temp per se. The gauge actually reflects what a computer model simulation estimates the oil temperature should be based on current information. It takes data parameters like ambient temp, rpm, engine load, vehicle speed, gear, throttle position and dozens of other data points to build a very accurate simulation."
"We had a chat and exchanged some emails with one of their powertrain engineers and learned some interesting stuff. First, the oil temp gauge in the center cluster isn't actually measuring oil temp per se. The gauge actually reflects what a computer model simulation estimates the oil temperature should be based on current information. It takes data parameters like ambient temp, rpm, engine load, vehicle speed, gear, throttle position and dozens of other data points to build a very accurate simulation."
I thank you for providing the quote. Based on that language I hesitantly would have to agree that maybe the system for measuring oil temperature is very different from the C6 platform. If so, I also agree that this is an unusual implement of what should be a simple solution. Lastly, I think this would be a good question for the Ask Tadge section.
St. Jude Donor 05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17
Originally Posted by mfasano727
if they use a thermocouple sensor, they will use an algorithm to calculate the temp. because they don't have a linear response. every degree change does not mean the same voltage change. Maybe this is what they meant.
I agree with you , but I would not think they would say it is a complicated algorithm with many variables. As you know thermocouples are widely used in the industrial world.
And according to the OP, "calculates oil temperatures".
Oh, thanks. That clears it up for me. Although, 500-800 pounds more, I don't think so. The Camaro is heavier, yes, but the Corvette
is hardly a light-weight. You think maybe having room for four people might account for some of that? But what does that have to do with measuring/ and or calculating oil temperature?
I was trying to rationalize why they would use such a complicated method for something that probably most cars don't even provide to the driver (oil temp), and the only thing I can think of is that it is useful information for extended warrantees and the oil life monitoring system.
I think I happened to stumble onto some information that pertains to this subject. I was reading my latest issue of Grassroots Motorsports. They are doing a Camaro road course car build and are experiencing 300 degree oil temperatures with their LS3.
They called somebody at powertrain engineering about this and he gave them an interesting response: engine oil temperatures are not measured, they are calculated based on a complicated algorithm with many variables.
I am thinking that if the LS3 is designed this way, then almost certainly the LT1 and the Z06 engine use similar technology. Has anybody else heard this?
I was a little blown away by this information. If you had something wrong with the engine, would this mean that a real high oil temperature might not show up because the ECU expects everything to be working normally? And what if the calculations are not entirely accurate? Maybe your oil is not really hitting 300. Maybe they put in a fudge-factor to encourage you to back off for longevity's sake.
Has somebody installed a direct reading temperature gage to verify the factory supplied information?
This is all very interesting because I am at this time dealing with an oil temperature display error between my OEM DIC digital display and my AiM MXL2 Dash Logger. The AiM hardware is installed in my 05 Corvette track car.The AiM MXL2 communicates with the ECU OBDII connection to display, alarm and log the 22 Channels of the ECU data stream. ECU_18 is the channel for Engine oil temperature.
My problem is that the MXL2 display is reading 30 Deg F higher than the OEM DIC display. AiM seems to think the problem is in as you described:"engine oil temperatures are not measured, they are calculated based on a complicated algorithm with many variables."
We are still looking into this as being the cause.
I am somewhat confused as to why this is done and also why the Channel 18 data collected by the MXL2 is not the same as displayed on the OEM DIC display. I am going to do more testing with AiM to come up with a solution to the problem.
A guy on camaro5 discovered this several months ago and built his own oil temperature monitor that measures real data. Not sure of the outcome but i'll try and look for the link.
If I had a car that was routinely seeing over 300 oil temperature, I would want to know for sure. Somebody out there should tap into the oil supply with a direct reading gauge. Somebody should ask Tadge if the information I presented is accurate.
Good suggestion .
I just Asked Tadge for an explanation .
This is all very interesting because I am at this time dealing with an oil temperature display error between my OEM DIC digital display and my AiM MXL2 Dash Logger. The AiM hardware is installed in my 05 Corvette track car.The AiM MXL2 communicates with the ECU OBDII connection to display, alarm and log the 22 Channels of the ECU data stream. ECU_18 is the channel for Engine oil temperature.
My problem is that the MXL2 display is reading 30 Deg F higher than the OEM DIC display. AiM seems to think the problem is in as you described:"engine oil temperatures are not measured, they are calculated based on a complicated algorithm with many variables."
We are still looking into this as being the cause.
I am somewhat confused as to why this is done and also why the Channel 18 data collected by the MXL2 is not the same as displayed on the OEM DIC display. I am going to do more testing with AiM to come up with a solution to the problem.
I'm not sure if your track car is a base or a Z06, but if it is a using the factory dry-sump provided in the (GS, Z06, ZR1) there are 2 temperature sensors. The oil temp displayed in the DIC corresponds to the oil in dry sump reservoir, but the my ODBii reader uses PID 221154 (Hex Vale: 35FE2) which shows oil temp at/in the engine which is usually a few degrees different. In my experiments I have found that the delta between the two sensors is dependent on the type of driving.