C7 Z06 Discussion General Z06 Corvette Discussion, LT4 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: GEM Motorsports

MT Z06-Viper-Porsche GT3 RS report

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2016, 05:41 PM
  #21  
johnglenntwo
Le Mans Master
 
johnglenntwo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Beaverton OR
Posts: 8,788
Received 164 Likes on 148 Posts
Default Conditions!

Originally Posted by JIAZZ06
Read it/see it here: http://www.motortrend.com/news/2016-...he-911-gt3-rs/. The results have appeared on the forum before, but there is some interesting input from the testers that I don't think we have seen before. I wonder if the Z06 loose rear end issue would have been less if Randy had tried a different PTM setting.
Down force!
Old 01-25-2016, 05:43 PM
  #22  
Lavender
Melting Slicks
 
Lavender's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,732
Received 320 Likes on 172 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by four0nefive
Considering MT has done track sessions with the Z06 (during the Nismo vs. Z07 test), they know that taking a cool down lap helps. I think the times would towards the end of the session become fairly close. The Kumhos apparently aren't great for lasting very long and once the Sport Cup 2s get warm (tires on both the GT3 RS and Z07), they don't grip well.




While I somewhat agree, the GT3 RS has a better aero set up that creates downforce, but not as much drag. It also has a PDK vs. the TR6070 in the Z. 140 and 138 definitely isn't bad though considering the 918 and P1 will do about 150, and both of those cars make over 800 horsepower.




I won't say they're "idiots" as they are credible and ran a same day test between all three cars. I will say however, why didn't they get help from the techs (from Porsche and Chevy) if they felt the cars weren't set up right? I'm pretty sure Jim Mero was there and I'm confident Porsche sent a team as well.
What exactly is Jim Mero going to do to set the car up for a freakin wet track? Send a prayer?
Old 01-25-2016, 05:51 PM
  #23  
jvp
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
jvp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,066
Received 3,805 Likes on 1,145 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer

Default

Originally Posted by four0nefive
I will say however, why didn't they get help from the techs (from Porsche and Chevy) if they felt the cars weren't set up right? I'm pretty sure Jim Mero was there and I'm confident Porsche sent a team as well.
Perhaps they didn't ask for the help, or when it was offered it was ignored? Dunno. It'll be interesting to see what Tadge says since AliZ51's question about the MT test was sent on Sunday.
Old 01-25-2016, 06:55 PM
  #24  
four0nefive
Melting Slicks
 
four0nefive's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,347
Received 381 Likes on 236 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lavender
What exactly is Jim Mero going to do to set the car up for a freakin wet track? Send a prayer?
Damp, not wet, but anyways, the guy knows the car better than anyone honestly. You don't think he would know the best settings and such to help the Z perform good?
Old 01-25-2016, 07:01 PM
  #25  
TARANTULA
Melting Slicks
 
TARANTULA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,566
Received 1,035 Likes on 468 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by four0nefive
Damp, not wet, but anyways, the guy knows the car better than anyone honestly. You don't think he would know the best settings and such to help the Z perform good?
I agree but they should run the cars with the factory supplied alignment. If the want to make sure its correct fine. But no other adjustments should be made. This off course for all cars.
Old 01-25-2016, 07:04 PM
  #26  
SBC_and_a_stick
Safety Car
 
SBC_and_a_stick's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2012
Location: North California
Posts: 4,737
Received 551 Likes on 311 Posts

Default

The only thing I see in the report that justifies GT3 RS>Corvette Z06 is that the Porsche does it with less power. Does what, (certainly was slower on the track)? So what if the mixture is different? Terrible way to justify giving the Z a 3rd place.

Not sure where I would put the Z in the ranking, but one thing to consider is that a track car must be cheap because a ton of money is spent on consumables. Then you have to consider the going market price and that the Z is substantially cheaper than both.

To conclude, I'd say the Viper won fair and square in this track comparison. Then there is a "OTHERS" category and the Z and GT3 RS are in there equally. Either that or give the edge to the Z because you won't see an RS at the track on 99% of track days due to cost.
Old 01-25-2016, 07:21 PM
  #27  
RC000E
Le Mans Master
 
RC000E's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: My interests are mobile
Posts: 6,937
Received 346 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

I like that they do the Pobst test, but I think it'd also be good to get a "lesser" driver from Motor Trend to drive lap times and see what a lesser driver can manage. To me, that'd be more representative of what the car will do in most peoples hands.

I can wish I guess. I know they are time limited doing shooting, pictures, driver switches, blah blah blah.

In the end, hey...the Z06 is cheap, daily driver worthy and can still lay some *** whippin...can't bitch too much I suppose. I just hate seeing corvette take third in any contest...oh well I guess...it is what it is.
Old 01-25-2016, 07:54 PM
  #28  
keagan
Melting Slicks
 
keagan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,292
Received 880 Likes on 450 Posts

Default

I'm with you RC000E. Can't stand when the vette takes the back seat but considering a chart they showed in that article. It's the cheapest in the top 5. Amongst HyperCars!! That's a win for all vette fans. The Viper kicked *** and we all knew that it would.
Old 01-25-2016, 08:00 PM
  #29  
Dethred
Instructor
 
Dethred's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2014
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RBK
That is a "credible" article, with results as you would expect. They are honest about the Viper's ergonomics (no one can drive home on a race track or the grocery store) which matters.
Credible article in what way? They basically plagiarized an RT-10 review from the early 90's. AC doesn't work, steering wheel in the wrong place, loud? Why are the only complaints about these so-called issues only coming from a few journalists? Find one such complaint from actual owners.

Funny, every time I get in the car, the steering wheel is right in front of me, maybe theirs was in the glove box? My only complaint about the AC is that my feet are colder than the rest of my body, so in the summer I have to wear socks. The noise is no louder than an S2000, or similar, despite a massive engine up front and side-exit exhausts. I put about 1,000 miles on mine every month, ranging from grocery shopping to road trips.

The only thing I hate when driving it is taking it for a fuel fill-up. Why? People will bother me to ask about it and take pictures every damn time.
Old 01-25-2016, 08:04 PM
  #30  
Snorman
Scraping the splitter.
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Snorman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,115
Received 1,028 Likes on 486 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13-'14-'15

Default

Originally Posted by SBC_and_a_stick
The only thing I see in the report that justifies GT3 RS>Corvette Z06 is that the Porsche does it with less power. Does what, (certainly was slower on the track)? So what if the mixture is different? Terrible way to justify giving the Z a 3rd place.

Not sure where I would put the Z in the ranking, but one thing to consider is that a track car must be cheap because a ton of money is spent on consumables. Then you have to consider the going market price and that the Z is substantially cheaper than both.

To conclude, I'd say the Viper won fair and square in this track comparison. Then there is a "OTHERS" category and the Z and GT3 RS are in there equally. Either that or give the edge to the Z because you won't see an RS at the track on 99% of track days due to cost.
So the badass Kumhos on the Viper seem to be working their way into perpetual backorder on TireRack, which is probably going to be symbolic of the availability of that tire. Based on what Dodge said about the V720 at ACR release, they are faster than slicks. It's going to be interesting when people end up going to a slower tire. And while those tires are VERY reasonably priced, it seems like tire life even for HPDE is VERY short.
S.
Old 01-25-2016, 08:26 PM
  #31  
SBC_and_a_stick
Safety Car
 
SBC_and_a_stick's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2012
Location: North California
Posts: 4,737
Received 551 Likes on 311 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Snorman
So the badass Kumhos on the Viper seem to be working their way into perpetual backorder on TireRack, which is probably going to be symbolic of the availability of that tire. Based on what Dodge said about the V720 at ACR release, they are faster than slicks. It's going to be interesting when people end up going to a slower tire. And while those tires are VERY reasonably priced, it seems like tire life even for HPDE is VERY short.
S.
Availability is a bitch but wasn't it the same for our Michelin's just after the Z's release?

I'm not sure if I believe they are stickier than slicks, certainly not every slick. I do believe they are stickier than Cup 2s.

From what I gathered at the track from the owners the ACRs can run at least 4 track days on one set of Kumhos. The one guy that seemed to destroy them quicker also ran about 4 seconds faster than either of the two I talked to. So at this point I can't say that they wear faster than the Cup 2s. The guys who ran 4 track days did 1:37.x at Laguna Seca which is faster than what I run, and I definitely destroy my Cup 2s in 4 track days.
Old 01-25-2016, 10:50 PM
  #32  
schaibaa
Burning Brakes
 
schaibaa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,145
Received 145 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SBC_and_a_stick
Availability is a bitch but wasn't it the same for our Michelin's just after the Z's release?

I'm not sure if I believe they are stickier than slicks, certainly not every slick. I do believe they are stickier than Cup 2s.

From what I gathered at the track from the owners the ACRs can run at least 4 track days on one set of Kumhos. The one guy that seemed to destroy them quicker also ran about 4 seconds faster than either of the two I talked to. So at this point I can't say that they wear faster than the Cup 2s. The guys who ran 4 track days did 1:37.x at Laguna Seca which is faster than what I run, and I definitely destroy my Cup 2s in 4 track days.
This is second hand - but I've heard they barely last a day.

That said I once saw a chart of how long track tires last based upon annual income. Pretty much true
Old 01-25-2016, 11:19 PM
  #33  
stoessjc
Burning Brakes
 
stoessjc's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Woodland Hills California
Posts: 1,094
Received 45 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

What's up? The Corvette gets no points for being the "greenest" of the three? Least CO2, best fuel economy, most hp. There is no justice!
The following users liked this post:
Daekwan06 (01-27-2016)
Old 01-25-2016, 11:35 PM
  #34  
Augdog1964
Intermediate
 
Augdog1964's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2016
Location: Richmond IN
Posts: 35
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Congrats to US!

Man can you imagine... we have two AMERICAN cars racing on Laguna Seca, and beating out high dollar european cars that have been known for racing pedigree for generations...

Look at the top 12 places at LS, 8 are held by Viper or Corvette...and our cars at least 1/3 the price. Who cares who "won" as we are all winning right now. The GT350 may also break into this group.

Germans, Italians, Brits, have to put at a min. $300,000 cars on the line to do the same... heck two of the 12 are on each side of $1.0 million!

I will say, although I own a Viper ACR-E, and am hoping to get a C7R, Corvette has done an amazing thing at the price point for sure! Now if we could get an ACR type Corvette... I'm in for that!

Way to go America... way to go Corvette, and way to go Viper SRT!

Last edited by Augdog1964; 01-25-2016 at 11:36 PM.
The following 4 users liked this post by Augdog1964:
Daekwan06 (01-27-2016), Hemi Dave (01-26-2016), hootowlc7 (01-26-2016), ZoratZ06 (01-26-2016)
Old 01-25-2016, 11:53 PM
  #35  
2cnd Chance
Melting Slicks
 
2cnd Chance's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,631
Received 976 Likes on 532 Posts

Default

A very contradictory article...lacks credibility.
The following users liked this post:
Lavender (01-26-2016)
Old 01-26-2016, 08:22 AM
  #36  
NineBall
Safety Car
 
NineBall's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 3,697
Received 107 Likes on 58 Posts

Default

I would be proud to own all three of those cars, at the same time. Add a Mustang GT350R and it would be my perfect garage.
The following 3 users liked this post by NineBall:
Augdog1964 (01-26-2016), Hemi Dave (01-26-2016), ZoratZ06 (01-26-2016)
Old 01-26-2016, 12:08 PM
  #37  
05dsom
Melting Slicks
 
05dsom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: East Amherst NY
Posts: 3,312
Received 72 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Snorman
One of the most interesting comments is that they don't think the RS is as good as the "regular" GT3. Strange indeed considering the RS is a GT3 turned up to 11.
S.
latest issue of Panorama has the GT3 beating the GT3RS and the 991 Cup car!

Obviously, in the hands of enthusiasts and not pro drivers the accessibility of the GT3 may produce faster lap times than the RS or Cup cars (but not the RSR?)







Last edited by 05dsom; 01-26-2016 at 12:08 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Augdog1964 (01-26-2016)

Get notified of new replies

To MT Z06-Viper-Porsche GT3 RS report

Old 01-26-2016, 12:12 PM
  #38  
Augdog1964
Intermediate
 
Augdog1964's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2016
Location: Richmond IN
Posts: 35
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

WOW, not the first time I've heard the GT3 does better than the RS... and the RS was a ground looper with Pobst... scary if he loses the rear end...
Old 01-26-2016, 02:19 PM
  #39  
05dsom
Melting Slicks
 
05dsom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: East Amherst NY
Posts: 3,312
Received 72 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Augdog1964
WOW, not the first time I've heard the GT3 does better than the RS... and the RS was a ground looper with Pobst... scary if he loses the rear end...
from the MT article:

However, it’s (GT3 RS) just not as good to drive as the regular flavor GT3 is. “The GT3’s magical handling has somehow been deleted with the addition of the RS badge,” Cammisa says. “Whereas the GT3 was perfectly neutral, the RS flings itself into corners *** first and then understeers through the rest of the turn.” The GT3 RS felt like an old-school 911, specifically the Widowmaker, i.e., the 996 GT2. Near the limit, the GT3 RS was an oversteering handful. A talented (amateur) driver friend of mine explained that on the same track he was faster in the GT3 than in the GT3 RS. I think that’s going to be the case unless you’re a professional.
Old 01-26-2016, 06:30 PM
  #40  
Augdog1964
Intermediate
 
Augdog1964's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2016
Location: Richmond IN
Posts: 35
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

YIKES, oversteer in a track car...


Quick Reply: MT Z06-Viper-Porsche GT3 RS report



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 AM.