C7 Z06 Discussion General Z06 Corvette Discussion, LT4 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: GEM Motorsports

So the 2017's Z06 require 93 octane, vs the 15-16's...thoughts? Benefits/disadvantage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-15-2016, 02:19 PM
  #1  
jordanC6Z06
Racer
Thread Starter
 
jordanC6Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Thunder bay Ontario
Posts: 259
Received 40 Likes on 18 Posts
Default So the 2017's Z06 require 93 octane, vs the 15-16's...thoughts? Benefits/disadvantage

I have a 2017 Z coming. And I've just learnt it requires 93 octane, it says right in the manual, and anything less will result in less power/possible knocking. So that means the 17's have a different tune. So the 15-16's only required 91. So my question is, besides cooler engine temps with the higher octane, what's the advantage. More crank Hp? Because I haven't seen anything advertising that and as far as I know it still makes 650/650 on 93 fuel, the same as the 15/16's but only needed 91 fuel to accomplish that...may sounds like a newbie question but I'm trying to figure this out.
Old 11-15-2016, 02:34 PM
  #2  
tzoid9
Drifting
 
tzoid9's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,402
Received 417 Likes on 283 Posts
Default

I would have a difficult time believing that the '017's have any octane requirements than the 015's or 016's. 91 octane fuel is all that's available in several of the western USA states. The cars are tuned to run on 91 octane but have the ability to generate more HP/Torque with higher octane fuel, like the 93 octane available in many eastern states. I believe you're concern is unjustified.
Old 11-15-2016, 02:48 PM
  #3  
RandomTask
Race Director
 
RandomTask's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Alexandria VA
Posts: 17,012
Received 276 Likes on 144 Posts

Default

^^ Bingo. Basically run the highest you can aka not WaWa wato-gas.

Technically the car would run on regular but it would be pinging/knocking and you risk hurting a piston from predetonation. This really only applies under load.
Old 11-15-2016, 03:26 PM
  #4  
davepl
Le Mans Master
 
davepl's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2000
Location: Redmond WA
Posts: 8,727
Received 1,500 Likes on 987 Posts

Default

My guess is that they've partially addressed the overheating issue by running a more aggressive timing scheme (or less retard due to high intake temps, etc) and that in turn requires more octane.

The best I can buy here (WA) is 92, however.

If it actually fixed the track heating I'd be willing to run a can or Torco in each tank to bring up the octane if I could run that tune, but I'd really want to know what the rationale for the higher octane requirement is/was before I started to emulate it.

My big question, though, is when you say you've "just learned" that it requires 93, where'd you learn that?

Last edited by davepl; 11-15-2016 at 03:27 PM.
Old 11-15-2016, 03:31 PM
  #5  
fleming23
Melting Slicks
 
fleming23's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas Georgia
Posts: 2,787
Received 594 Likes on 408 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (track prepared)
C3 of Year Winner (track prepared) 2019

Default

https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...post1593475076
Old 11-15-2016, 04:01 PM
  #6  
rbartick
Le Mans Master
 
rbartick's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Admit Nothing, Deny Everything, Make Counter Accusations.
Posts: 7,326
Received 514 Likes on 346 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DAVE396LT1
My big question, though, is when you say you've "just learned" that it requires 93, where'd you learn that?
The octane requirements are in the 2017 manual. Someone actually posted screen grabs from both the 2016 and 2017 manuals a few weeks ago:

https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...post1593304193

My guess is the 2017 cars have the new "100 octane tune".
Old 11-15-2016, 04:55 PM
  #7  
jordanC6Z06
Racer
Thread Starter
 
jordanC6Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Thunder bay Ontario
Posts: 259
Received 40 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tzoid9
I would have a difficult time believing that the '017's have any octane requirements than the 015's or 016's. 91 octane fuel is all that's available in several of the western USA states. The cars are tuned to run on 91 octane but have the ability to generate more HP/Torque with higher octane fuel, like the 93 octane available in many eastern states. I believe you're concern is unjustified.
Here is the 15-16 manual vs. the 2017 manual. The 2017 manual asks for a min of 93 or loss of performance will occur...
Old 11-15-2016, 04:57 PM
  #8  
jordanC6Z06
Racer
Thread Starter
 
jordanC6Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Thunder bay Ontario
Posts: 259
Received 40 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DAVE396LT1
My guess is that they've partially addressed the overheating issue by running a more aggressive timing scheme (or less retard due to high intake temps, etc) and that in turn requires more octane.

The best I can buy here (WA) is 92, however.

If it actually fixed the track heating I'd be willing to run a can or Torco in each tank to bring up the octane if I could run that tune, but I'd really want to know what the rationale for the higher octane requirement is/was before I started to emulate it.

My big question, though, is when you say you've "just learned" that it requires 93, where'd you learn that?
I read on another post about the dyno with the 2017 Z and someone posted showing the octane requiments in the manual between the 2015/2016 and 2017. See below, I just saved an reposted them.
Old 11-15-2016, 05:03 PM
  #9  
gve
Drifting
 
gve's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Appleton Wisconsin
Posts: 1,316
Received 458 Likes on 204 Posts

Default

My 2016 surges and feels like it's missing with 91 octane and light throttle. When I use 93 or higher it runs much better. I'm not surprised they upped the recommended octane based on my experience.
Old 11-15-2016, 05:50 PM
  #10  
etekberg
Drifting
 
etekberg's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City OK
Posts: 1,327
Received 256 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

That's bad news for me. 93 is a pain in the *** around here. I've even considered switching to E85 on a C5 just to get around having to dick around mixing race gas.
Old 11-15-2016, 05:58 PM
  #11  
Oleman
Pro
 
Oleman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2010
Location: Canton Georgia
Posts: 591
Received 36 Likes on 29 Posts

Default

I run 93 in my 2015 always have. So used to putting in since my 09 has to have it never even thought about 91.
Old 11-15-2016, 07:00 PM
  #12  
K1600GT
Pro
 
K1600GT's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Location: Slinger, WI
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

I read in another post where someone was adding a couple gallons of E85 to a tank of 91 to get up to 93. Does this work?

For or the people that know more about the pluses and minuses to this please speak up.
Old 11-15-2016, 07:07 PM
  #13  
sTz
Le Mans Master
 
sTz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2014
Location: Northeast
Posts: 5,861
Received 2,425 Likes on 1,597 Posts
Default

My '16 runs better with 93, which I generally use anyway. My previous GT500 ran better with 93 too. GM is addressing the obvious in the '17 owner's manual. I doubt that it's anything more...

Last edited by sTz; 11-15-2016 at 08:18 PM.
Old 11-15-2016, 07:46 PM
  #14  
tzoid9
Drifting
 
tzoid9's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,402
Received 417 Likes on 283 Posts
Default

So what are we concluding, here. I have a '016 M7 and have NEVER experienced any knocking or anything else, but 93 octane fuel is readily available at most gas stations where I live, including the discount or off brand locations like mini marts. So is the consensus that 2015 & 2016 owners should consider getting the "100 0ctane" tune from GM? If that tune makes the car run stronger with the same 93 octane fuel and it's supported by GM (ie it doesn't cancel the car's warranty), then it sounds like a respectable idea. Am I getting this correctly or f'd up?
Old 11-15-2016, 07:50 PM
  #15  
lordofwar
Melting Slicks
 
lordofwar's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,288
Received 545 Likes on 378 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by etekberg
That's bad news for me. 93 is a pain in the *** around here. I've even considered switching to E85 on a C5 just to get around having to dick around mixing race gas.
how about a bottle of octane boost when you fill it up?
Old 11-15-2016, 09:24 PM
  #16  
phantasms
Leeds.io
Support Corvetteforum!
 
phantasms's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Cross River, New York
Posts: 4,594
Received 398 Likes on 239 Posts
St. Jude Donor '14-'15-'16
NCM Sinkhole Donor

Default

Originally Posted by tzoid9
So what are we concluding, here. I have a '016 M7 and have NEVER experienced any knocking or anything else, but 93 octane fuel is readily available at most gas stations where I live, including the discount or off brand locations like mini marts. So is the consensus that 2015 & 2016 owners should consider getting the "100 0ctane" tune from GM? If that tune makes the car run stronger with the same 93 octane fuel and it's supported by GM (ie it doesn't cancel the car's warranty), then it sounds like a respectable idea. Am I getting this correctly or f'd up?
This is exactly what I want to know. I always fill up with 93. Should I go for the 100 tune with hopes of keeping better timing when the temps go up?
The following users liked this post:
tzoid9 (11-15-2016)
Old 11-16-2016, 12:31 AM
  #17  
Bill Dearborn
Tech Contributor
 
Bill Dearborn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,096
Received 8,930 Likes on 5,334 Posts

Default

I spent two days running at Carolina Motorsports Park running 90 octane premium without Ethanol. Car ran fine. If there was a drop in power the rear R7s didn't know it. They kept spinning in 3rd gear at 85 to 90 mph.

Bill

Get notified of new replies

To So the 2017's Z06 require 93 octane, vs the 15-16's...thoughts? Benefits/disadvantage

Old 11-16-2016, 01:18 AM
  #18  
mvisible
Advanced
 
mvisible's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Posts: 64
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

So if I had two z06's. One a 16 and one a 17 and they both had the same 91 fuel, would the 16 make more power?
Old 11-16-2016, 06:57 AM
  #19  
7.0ltrpower
Instructor
 
7.0ltrpower's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

I smell 's..... I don't believe "Owners Manual" pics. looks photoshop. So read your own manual. My '16 manual says use 91. Never heard pinging w/ 91....Just enjoy.
Old 11-16-2016, 07:07 AM
  #20  
erick_e
Melting Slicks

Support Corvetteforum!
 
erick_e's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: KY/TN
Posts: 2,473
Received 93 Likes on 71 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13-'14-'15-'16

Default

Originally Posted by 7.0ltrpower
I smell 's..... I don't believe "Owners Manual" pics. looks photoshop. So read your own manual. My '16 manual says use 91. Never heard pinging w/ 91....Just enjoy.
Straight from Chevrolet.

http://www.chevrolet.com/content/dam...ers-Manual.pdf


Quick Reply: So the 2017's Z06 require 93 octane, vs the 15-16's...thoughts? Benefits/disadvantage



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:57 PM.