C7 ZR1 Discussion General ZR1 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Kraken

Mero confirmed the 'Ring time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2019, 11:50 AM
  #21  
UnhandledException
Drifting
 
UnhandledException's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,907
Received 1,351 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jim Mero
HI all,

Full disclosure about the conditions under how the lap was run is part of my Bash presentation.

There is also a second lap/story behind it. If there is anyone on the planet who knows you need to actually run the time, it's me. But that's not going to happen.

After the descriptions of the 2 laps are revealed, each can draw their own conclusion, and probably will.

Relying on my 18 years of Nurburgring development, coupled with the hundreds of hours of data analysis I did on the ZR1, I can assure you the ZR1 is a sub 7 car. Even with all that, you need luck. The probability of luck diminishes when we are at the Nurburgring 2 of the 18 weeks of industrypool.

I apologize for being vague, but that's all i can offer at the moment.
Jim,

What's your take on this "R" compound Porsche specific Michelin Cup 2 tires? I bet if ZR1 wore those tires, tires were warm, and conditions were ideal, ZR1 would run a sub 6:50 ring time and go head to head with GT2RS.

It's great to see you post on this forum. It's even greater for me to be able to quote your post You are a legend

Last edited by UnhandledException; 04-10-2019 at 11:50 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by UnhandledException:
Mikec7z (04-10-2019), WzUpDoc (04-11-2019)
Old 04-10-2019, 11:56 AM
  #22  
serpent
Pro
 
serpent's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2014
Posts: 530
Received 165 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UnhandledException
Jim,

What's your take on this "R" compound Porsche specific Michelin Cup 2 tires? I bet if ZR1 wore those tires, tires were warm, and conditions were ideal, ZR1 would run a sub 6:50 ring time and go head to head with GT2RS.

It's great to see you post on this forum. It's even greater for me to be able to quote your post You are a legend
I don't think the zr1 can go head to head with the GT2RS. Weight, 4wheel steering, dct prove the RS is superior.
Also from what I remember the RS dynos a little under 700hp to the wheels. So crank hp is definitely higher that what they claim.
Old 04-10-2019, 12:00 PM
  #23  
UnhandledException
Drifting
 
UnhandledException's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,907
Received 1,351 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by serpent
I don't think the zr1 can go head to head with the GT2RS. Weight, 4wheel steering, dct prove the RS is superior.
Also from what I remember the RS dynos a little under 700hp to the wheels. So crank hp is definitely higher that what they claim.
ZR1 is not a 755 hp car under majority of the circumstances. ZR1 is a 755 car with 91 octane gas 4000 ft above sea level. With 93 octane and at sea level, I think it is easily over 800 hp/740 torque car.

GT2RS weighs 250 lbs less than ZR1. It's not a lightweight car by any means.
Old 04-10-2019, 12:21 PM
  #24  
moose.b3
Drifting
 
moose.b3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: Sierra Mtns. The Great State Of Jefferson
Posts: 1,810
Received 169 Likes on 128 Posts

Default

The Ring time may not matter to 99.999% of the 7.7 billion people on Earth, but that means approximately 77,000 care about the time. That's quite a few and I'm 1 of them. Thanks Jim!
The following 5 users liked this post by moose.b3:
Boba Fett (04-10-2019), briank17 (09-13-2019), DebRedZR1 (04-11-2019), Warp Factor (04-11-2019), WzUpDoc (04-11-2019)
Old 04-10-2019, 12:30 PM
  #25  
Sub Driver
Banned Scam/Spammer
 
Sub Driver's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,167
Received 3,772 Likes on 1,467 Posts
Default

I'm surprised, I thought that when we finally found out the time it would be quicker than the Viper ACR that did 7:01 with a manual transmission and 110 less hp.
The following users liked this post:
mfain (04-10-2019)
Old 04-10-2019, 12:31 PM
  #26  
UnhandledException
Drifting
 
UnhandledException's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,907
Received 1,351 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

If I had the money, I would fly jim there own my own dime, get a car out there, rent the track, and do this properly for ZR1 once and for all. I think the manual transmission ZR1 is a 6:50 capable car. That says a lot for the chassis. Porsche has way too many electronic advantages.
Old 04-10-2019, 12:32 PM
  #27  
UnhandledException
Drifting
 
UnhandledException's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,907
Received 1,351 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sub Driver
I'm surprised, I thought that when we finally found out the time it would be quicker than the Viper ACR that did 7:01 with a manual transmission and 110 less hp.
When I read "cold tires", I was actually amazed how it pulled 7:04 time. Have you driven a ZR1 with cold tires? I have and it's not fun at all. Car breaks traction in 4th gear if you are not careful.
Old 04-10-2019, 12:34 PM
  #28  
serpent
Pro
 
serpent's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2014
Posts: 530
Received 165 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UnhandledException
ZR1 is not a 755 hp car under majority of the circumstances. ZR1 is a 755 car with 91 octane gas 4000 ft above sea level. With 93 octane and at sea level, I think it is easily over 800 hp/740 torque car.

GT2RS weighs 250 lbs less than ZR1. It's not a lightweight car by any means.
ZR1 was already dyno'd by:
hennessey - 654hp/645tq
https://www.thedrive.com/news/22854/...-at-the-wheels
630hp/626tq

Acceleration isnt close either, the ZR1 is more equal to the New Ford GT, while the RS is closer to a 720s. 720s easily leaves the american cars behind.
Old 04-10-2019, 12:50 PM
  #29  
Lavender
Melting Slicks
 
Lavender's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,732
Received 320 Likes on 172 Posts

Default

Welcome to the forum Jim Mero. Its great to have you here!

Last edited by Lavender; 04-10-2019 at 12:50 PM.
The following 5 users liked this post by Lavender:
briank17 (09-13-2019), DebRedZR1 (04-11-2019), Jim Mero (04-10-2019), shadeshift (04-12-2019), WzUpDoc (04-11-2019)
Old 04-10-2019, 01:58 PM
  #30  
mfain
Drifting
 
mfain's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2010
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 1,276
Received 881 Likes on 397 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ruz
The times have nothing to do with sales...
"Nothing" is a little too much of an absolute. I was looking for a new, modern, American-made track car. I cancelled an early C7 Z06 order and later passed on an available ZR1, not because of a poor Ring lap time, but because GM had both cars there for extensive periods of time and NO time was forthcoming. That raised red flags - possible overheating, handling issues, poor performance compared to the competition - who could tell???? I am glad to hear that both cars performed well. I just wish GM had been a little more upfront at the time - it would have gotten them at least one more sale.

Still a Corvette fan!

Pappy
The following 2 users liked this post by mfain:
Mikec7z (04-10-2019), Xanthophyll (04-11-2019)
Old 04-10-2019, 02:05 PM
  #31  
Ruz
Race Director
 
Ruz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: MI
Posts: 10,268
Received 265 Likes on 106 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mfain
"Nothing" is a little too much of an absolute. I was looking for a new, modern, American-made track car. I cancelled an early C7 Z06 order and later passed on an available ZR1, not because of a poor Ring lap time, but because GM had both cars there for extensive periods of time and NO time was forthcoming. That raised red flags - possible overheating, handling issues, poor performance compared to the competition - who could tell???? I am glad to hear that both cars performed well. I just wish GM had been a little more upfront at the time - it would have gotten them at least one more sale.

Still a Corvette fan!

Pappy
Valid point...but your's seems to be an issue with a lack of Ring times, not Ring times themselves.

There were lots of press before the ZR1 was available where the target was sub 7 minutes on the Ring. If they would have come out before the car was available to the public that with all of their testing and development, the best actual time on the Ring for the ZR1 was 7:04, would that have made you say "Not buying the car because of it's Ring time"?
The following users liked this post:
Mikec7z (04-10-2019)
Old 04-10-2019, 02:08 PM
  #32  
Hib Halverson
Pro Mechanic
Pro Mechanic
 
Hib Halverson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: South-Central Coast California
Posts: 3,514
Received 1,143 Likes on 597 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jim Mero
HI all,

Full disclosure about the conditions under how the lap was run is part of my Bash presentation.

There is also a second lap/story behind it. If there is anyone on the planet who knows you need to actually run the time, it's me. But that's not going to happen.

After the descriptions of the 2 laps are revealed, each can draw their own conclusion, and probably will.

Relying on my 18 years of Nurburgring development, coupled with the hundreds of hours of data analysis I did on the ZR1, I can assure you the ZR1 is a sub 7 car. Even with all that, you need luck. The probability of luck diminishes when we are at the Nurburgring 2 of the 18 weeks of industrypool.

I apologize for being vague, but that's all i can offer at the moment.
Even if you're "vague" we still love ya, Mero!
The following users liked this post:
Jim Mero (04-10-2019)
Old 04-10-2019, 02:16 PM
  #33  
mfain
Drifting
 
mfain's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2010
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 1,276
Received 881 Likes on 397 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ruz
Valid point...but your's seems to be an issue with a lack of Ring times, not Ring times themselves.

There were lots of press before the ZR1 was available where the target was sub 7 minutes on the Ring. If they would have come out before the car was available to the public that with all of their testing and development, the best actual time on the Ring for the ZR1 was 7:04, would that have made you say "Not buying the car because of it's Ring time"?
You are correct. It was the lack of a Ring time and the way GM was handling the situation that bothered me. The advertising hype at the Z06's release didn't help. As it turns out, I think I made the right decision on the Z06 due to subsequently identified overheating issues. And in all fairness, by the time a ZR1 time could have been released I had already purchased an American-made car that had demonstrated a 7:01 at the Ring and was proving to be quite competitive on the local tracks. The ZR1s 7:04 is an excellent time and is an indicator of the car's potential.

Pappy
The following 2 users liked this post by mfain:
Mikec7z (04-10-2019), Xanthophyll (04-11-2019)
Old 04-10-2019, 03:21 PM
  #34  
the professor
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
the professor's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 140
Received 102 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Super cool having Jim Mero reply to this thread (even with his name dropped in the title)! Thank you for chiming in, Mr. Mero!
I really enjoy lap times wether it is the Nurburgring, C&D Lighting Lap, or just people on here posting times/videos. It is a fun way to compare all aspects of different cars that more simple things like drag racing can't provide.
I like the Olympics comparison that was brought up. That said, it isn't even close to as regulated or as easily repeatable as a 100m dash. I have absolutely no doubt that the ZR1 is a 6:5x car and wish GM would have stayed until they proved it. I'd love it if they took a ZR along when they have the ME car over there again but I fear that we will have to resort to a Viper-style crowdfunding effort if enough owners/fans care about putting our car where it belongs as the first American to break the 7 minute barrier.
Until then, I'm happy with the current time by an amazing all-around car!

Last edited by the professor; 04-10-2019 at 03:23 PM.
The following 4 users liked this post by the professor:
Jim Mero (04-10-2019), shadeshift (04-12-2019), The Blue Beast (08-21-2019), Xanthophyll (04-11-2019)
Old 04-10-2019, 03:50 PM
  #35  
Darion
Safety Car
 
Darion's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Youngstown Ohio
Posts: 4,734
Received 232 Likes on 142 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jim Mero
So, at the risk of being pummeled, I am going to interject my 2 cents, which is probably what it’s worth.

The beauty of free expression is we all can have it.

If you care about lap times, that’s great.

If you don’t care about lap times, that’s great.

Clearly, I care about lap times, but I don’t judge, or have any issues with someone who does not.

If I’ve offended anyone with this post, that was not my intention.

Jim
Class!

PC
The following users liked this post:
Jim Mero (04-10-2019)
Old 04-10-2019, 04:06 PM
  #36  
punky
Banned Scam/Spammer
 
punky's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Bonita Springs FL
Posts: 8,084
Received 3,862 Likes on 1,912 Posts

Default

This "Ring" stuff is a big deal for a very small number of enthusiasts. It is however amazing to have watched guys on forums break their ***** and fight with each other about which car is a Ring bad *** and why certain vehicles have no posted "RingTime". Much of this comes down to which car is north or south of 7 minutes by 3,4, or 5 seconds. Ridiculous even if nobody cheats and all runs are under the identical atmospheric conditions and there is no such thing as human error.

10 seconds is like 2% of 7 minutes. It is really not worth even talking about, stupid.
Old 04-10-2019, 05:19 PM
  #37  
dsevo
Pro
 
dsevo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 232 Likes on 96 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sub Driver
I'm surprised, I thought that when we finally found out the time it would be quicker than the Viper ACR that did 7:01 with a manual transmission and 110 less hp.
Yeah, that thing is an archaic piece of junk according to many on this forum. Real head scratcher that it's quicker around a high power track where it should have the biggest disadvantage. But, but, tires! Lol.

Get notified of new replies

To Mero confirmed the 'Ring time

Old 04-10-2019, 05:45 PM
  #38  
OnPoint
The Consigliere
Support Corvetteforum!
 
OnPoint's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: 2023 Z06 & 2010 ZR1
Posts: 22,252
Received 5,447 Likes on 2,272 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jim Mero
HI all,

Full disclosure about the conditions under how the lap was run is part of my Bash presentation.

There is also a second lap/story behind it. If there is anyone on the planet who knows you need to actually run the time, it's me. But that's not going to happen.

After the descriptions of the 2 laps are revealed, each can draw their own conclusion, and probably will.

Relying on my 18 years of Nurburgring development, coupled with the hundreds of hours of data analysis I did on the ZR1, I can assure you the ZR1 is a sub 7 car. Even with all that, you need luck. The probability of luck diminishes when we are at the Nurburgring 2 of the 18 weeks of industrypool.

I apologize for being vague, but that's all i can offer at the moment.
Jim,

It's pretty damned cool you have become a member of the Forum and have chosen to post. We all know and greatly appreciate your huge contribution to Corvette.

Welcome to the neighborhood.

Fantastic to have you among us.

Oh - and Thank You for all you've done for us enthusiasts.

The following 5 users liked this post by OnPoint:
BERETTA (04-14-2019), CPhelps (04-16-2019), Glenn Quagmire (04-11-2019), Jim Mero (04-10-2019), shadeshift (04-12-2019)
Old 04-10-2019, 06:15 PM
  #39  
vettefordays
Racer
 
vettefordays's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2013
Posts: 486
Received 153 Likes on 71 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by punky
This "Ring" stuff is a big deal for a very small number of enthusiasts. It is however amazing to have watched guys on forums break their ***** and fight with each other about which car is a Ring bad *** and why certain vehicles have no posted "RingTime". Much of this comes down to which car is north or south of 7 minutes by 3,4, or 5 seconds. Ridiculous even if nobody cheats and all runs are under the identical atmospheric conditions and there is no such thing as human error.

10 seconds is like 2% of 7 minutes. It is really not worth even talking about, stupid.
Let people enjoy things...

And for people saying that "track times" aren't why people buy these cars, that's simply not true. Posting track times is a piece of a larger marketing campaign. Lots of guys out there at Cars and Coffee that love to brag about their ACRs performance, even though they don't track or even drive their cars. It's a you-know-what measuring contest for a lot of guys.

You don't think a guy deciding between a Demon and the new GT500 is going to being comparing their time-slips before he makes that decision?

Last edited by vettefordays; 04-10-2019 at 06:19 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Xanthophyll (04-11-2019)
Old 04-10-2019, 06:22 PM
  #40  
L8ter
Melting Slicks
 
L8ter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Location: Just outside a swamp in Florida
Posts: 2,209
Received 929 Likes on 522 Posts
Default

Sorry, but someone had to do it


Welcome aboard Jim, and good luck on the new venture!
The following 4 users liked this post by L8ter:
CorvettoBrando (04-10-2019), Jim Mero (04-10-2019), RapidC84B (04-11-2019), shadeshift (04-12-2019)


Quick Reply: Mero confirmed the 'Ring time



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 PM.