The eRay and what you expect from it
#41
Racer
May I refer y’all back to the myriad of prognosticators who opined that the Z just HAD TO HAVE twin turbo’s?
GM made a much bigger splash w/o them.
Not making a splash with the eRay is not happening and a single 83 would garner only negative attention from the automotive press … not gonna happen!
Full Disclosure: I’m on Stingray’s Future Variant List for one. The Z may be the last of a breed, but the new E will be the first of a new breed.
Lord willin’ and the crik don’t rise, I’ll live long enough to get one …. still waitin’ for my C8.
GM made a much bigger splash w/o them.
Not making a splash with the eRay is not happening and a single 83 would garner only negative attention from the automotive press … not gonna happen!
Full Disclosure: I’m on Stingray’s Future Variant List for one. The Z may be the last of a breed, but the new E will be the first of a new breed.
Lord willin’ and the crik don’t rise, I’ll live long enough to get one …. still waitin’ for my C8.
The following 2 users liked this post by Only1cannoli:
msm859 (01-01-2022),
smoove7410 (01-02-2022)
#42
GM needs to give the ERay a very noticeable difference in feel with power to sooth the naysayers. I don't think 83hp would do it. I am unaware of any modern PHEV with such little hp. Hopefully GM will not compromise on power or battery capacity. Especially when you consider the costs difference between doing it right and doing a marginal job is de minimis.
For instance that ford escape can only do 37 miles of EV driving before it needs a recharge. So i can only imagine how small the battery is. Although i believe the on-board system (gas engine) can recharge the battery on the go in case you don't want to plug it in a power source whether on a 110v or a level 2.
#43
Melting Slicks
I think regular eco-hybrids like a ford escape uses a very small battery pack.
For instance that ford escape can only do 37 miles of EV driving before it needs a recharge. So i can only imagine how small the battery is. Although i believe the on-board system (gas engine) can recharge the battery on the go in case you don't want to plug it in a power source whether on a 110v or a level 2.
For instance that ford escape can only do 37 miles of EV driving before it needs a recharge. So i can only imagine how small the battery is. Although i believe the on-board system (gas engine) can recharge the battery on the go in case you don't want to plug it in a power source whether on a 110v or a level 2.
#44
#45
Safety Car
May I refer y’all back to the myriad of prognosticators who opined that the Z just HAD TO HAVE twin turbo’s?
GM made a much bigger splash w/o them.
Not making a splash with the eRay is not happening and a single 83 would garner only negative attention from the automotive press … not gonna happen!
Full Disclosure: I’m on Stingray’s Future Variant List for one. The Z may be the last of a breed, but the new E will be the first of a new breed.
Lord willin’ and the crik don’t rise, I’ll live long enough to get one …. still waitin’ for my C8.
GM made a much bigger splash w/o them.
Not making a splash with the eRay is not happening and a single 83 would garner only negative attention from the automotive press … not gonna happen!
Full Disclosure: I’m on Stingray’s Future Variant List for one. The Z may be the last of a breed, but the new E will be the first of a new breed.
Lord willin’ and the crik don’t rise, I’ll live long enough to get one …. still waitin’ for my C8.
The Z06 has 670 HP and I don't see them letting the E-ray overshadow the LT6. Can the electric motors be detuned (e.g., voltage or amperage reduced)? Twin 65 HP motors would put the car at or over 600 combined HP, which I think GM will want to hit, and not on paper challenge the z06's dominance.
#46
Le Mans Master
#47
Melting Slicks
Having seen the splash GM made with the Z06, I agree that a single 83 HP isn't going to cut it. IDK if they would use twin 83 HP motors, but the car would would fly with that power.
The Z06 has 670 HP and I don't see them letting the E-ray overshadow the LT6. Can the electric motors be detuned (e.g., voltage or amperage reduced)? Twin 65 HP motors would put the car at or over 600 combined HP, which I think GM will want to hit, and not on paper challenge the z06's dominance.
The Z06 has 670 HP and I don't see them letting the E-ray overshadow the LT6. Can the electric motors be detuned (e.g., voltage or amperage reduced)? Twin 65 HP motors would put the car at or over 600 combined HP, which I think GM will want to hit, and not on paper challenge the z06's dominance.
#48
Melting Slicks
And it's possible that will be the last Corvette generation produced. Almost all Corvette buyers have said they are not interested in full BEV Corvette. If it doesn't sell, GM will cancel it, and that will be the end of an era. GM doesn't keep cars around that don't sell anymore.
#49
From GM's briefing last year
If you look at post #30, you'll see that the assist all wheel drive is a much lower profile package and the 62-kW motor appears lighter because it doesn't use permeant magnets. Unless GM is hiding a packaging, which is more than possible, the 62-kW is the one. Now if the can mount two of them in the same type of low profile configuration, we've got a winner. The packaging of the others just doesn't seem to do the trick.
Or GM has another motor up its sleeve which is also possible but questionable.
"All are expected to offer excellent torque and power density, enabling a wide spectrum of vehicle types, from performance cars to work trucks."
GM’s 62-kW induction EV motor will be used in all-wheel drive applications.
GM’s 180-kW, permanent magnet EV motor will be used for front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive
GM’s 255-kW, permanent magnet EV motor will be used for performance all-wheel drive and rear-wheel
If you look at post #30, you'll see that the assist all wheel drive is a much lower profile package and the 62-kW motor appears lighter because it doesn't use permeant magnets. Unless GM is hiding a packaging, which is more than possible, the 62-kW is the one. Now if the can mount two of them in the same type of low profile configuration, we've got a winner. The packaging of the others just doesn't seem to do the trick.
Or GM has another motor up its sleeve which is also possible but questionable.
"All are expected to offer excellent torque and power density, enabling a wide spectrum of vehicle types, from performance cars to work trucks."
Last edited by Kodiak Bear; 01-01-2022 at 07:57 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Reep (01-13-2022)
#50
Racer
Having seen the splash GM made with the Z06, I agree that a single 83 HP isn't going to cut it. IDK if they would use twin 83 HP motors, but the car would would fly with that power.
The Z06 has 670 HP and I don't see them letting the E-ray overshadow the LT6. Can the electric motors be detuned (e.g., voltage or amperage reduced)? Twin 65 HP motors would put the car at or over 600 combined HP, which I think GM will want to hit, and not on paper challenge the z06's dominance.
The Z06 has 670 HP and I don't see them letting the E-ray overshadow the LT6. Can the electric motors be detuned (e.g., voltage or amperage reduced)? Twin 65 HP motors would put the car at or over 600 combined HP, which I think GM will want to hit, and not on paper challenge the z06's dominance.
At least that’s what Is holding my interest for now. Time will tell.
The following 2 users liked this post by Only1cannoli:
msm859 (01-02-2022),
SoonerSpeedFreak (01-24-2022)
#51
Le Mans Master
Let's hope the C9 is some sort of hybrid version that you can actually go places in, and has a reasonably priced battery that can be replaced easily when it takes a dump.
Last edited by Michael A; 01-01-2022 at 09:41 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Savoy2001 (01-01-2022)
#52
Ya the fastest heaviest tank corvette you mean. Fast or not it will weigh a ridiculous amount and handle line all the other heavy *** ev’s. Ugh.
#53
Drifting
Very few Corvette owners want a two seater version of a heavy pig Tesla Plaid that is absolutely useless on back roads, the track, long trips, and eats tires for lunch. After a few hard acceleration runs, it's "yawn". They also don't want a car that gets slower and goes shorter distances every day you own the car whether it's used or not. Maybe the Tesla fanboys do, but most Corvette owners don't.
Let's hope the C9 is some sort of hybrid version that you can actually go places in, and has a reasonably priced battery that can be replaced easily when it takes a dump.
Let's hope the C9 is some sort of hybrid version that you can actually go places in, and has a reasonably priced battery that can be replaced easily when it takes a dump.
Last edited by CDNZR; 01-02-2022 at 12:23 AM.
#54
Melting Slicks
Very few Corvette owners want a two seater version of a heavy pig Tesla Plaid that is absolutely useless on back roads, the track, long trips, and eats tires for lunch. After a few hard acceleration runs, it's "yawn". They also don't want a car that gets slower and goes shorter distances every day you own the car whether it's used or not. Maybe the Tesla fanboys do, but most Corvette owners don't.
Let's hope the C9 is some sort of hybrid version that you can actually go places in, and has a reasonably priced battery that can be replaced easily when it takes a dump.
Let's hope the C9 is some sort of hybrid version that you can actually go places in, and has a reasonably priced battery that can be replaced easily when it takes a dump.
#55
The Tesla Plaid is the Model S - a full size 4 door sedan. I trust GM will be able to build C9 BEV that weighs substantially less. The Tesla Model 3 Performance - a smaller 4 door sedan weighs @ 300 lbs more than the current C8 and can pull @ 1g. Again GM should be able to shave that weight difference pretty easily and have the C9 weigh no more than the current C8 while being a full BEV. Batteries are proving to last a whole lot longer than originally expected. Not sure what you are talking about with a car that gets slower and goes shorter distance every day you own the car?
My friends M3P, we did 4 pulls back to back to back to back. Well not necessarily but we got caught at 4 lights and we accelerated very hard from each light. We did not experience any warning from the screen saying about anything. I don't remember how much battery life we lost after those pulls but i'm suspecting maybe 5% total?
0-60 in M3P's are like 3.1-3.3. Consistently. That is VERY tough to beat in an ICE car.
The following 2 users liked this post by Z0HS1CK:
msm859 (01-02-2022),
Torque Obsessed (06-05-2022)
#56
Originally Posted by Only1cannoli
Appreciate your response but I’m not seeing why the Z06 is King. It’s a complete departure and solidly in its own lane. To say that another C8 variant needs to walk 3 paces behind is self limiting and won’t create the splash GM will need to garner the interest it’s hoping to generate.
At least that’s what Is holding my interest for now. Time will tell.
At least that’s what Is holding my interest for now. Time will tell.
The following 2 users liked this post by CAlexio:
msm859 (01-02-2022),
Torque Obsessed (06-05-2022)
#58
[QUOTE=Michael A;1604529707]Very few Corvette owners want a two seater version of a heavy pig Tesla Plaid that is absolutely useless on back roads, the track, long trips, and eats tires for lunch. After a few hard acceleration runs, it's "yawn". They also don't want a car that gets slower and goes shorter distances every day you own the car whether it's used or not. Maybe the Tesla fanboys do, but most Corvette owners don't.
Let's hope the C9 is some sort of hybrid version that you can actually go places in, and has a reasonably priced battery that can be replaced easily when it takes a dump.[/QUOTE
Z06 is track weapon
eray will be the 0-60 winner. Perfect for majority who don’t track their vehicles. A lot of misinformation posted above as well. One of my 5 vehicles happens to be a 5000 lb model x P100D
a suv than will run sub 3 sec
tires never an issue- getting places never an issue- in 5 years of ownership maybe have lost 3% of range-
batteries taking a dump aren’t any concern. Have had zero problems. Had a 2017 NSX for a fun toy a few years back. Great car that didn’t sell. Mine had msrp 199K sitting on showroom floor and I walked out paying 127k.
Overall one of the better sports cars I’ve owned.
Let's hope the C9 is some sort of hybrid version that you can actually go places in, and has a reasonably priced battery that can be replaced easily when it takes a dump.[/QUOTE
Z06 is track weapon
eray will be the 0-60 winner. Perfect for majority who don’t track their vehicles. A lot of misinformation posted above as well. One of my 5 vehicles happens to be a 5000 lb model x P100D
a suv than will run sub 3 sec
tires never an issue- getting places never an issue- in 5 years of ownership maybe have lost 3% of range-
batteries taking a dump aren’t any concern. Have had zero problems. Had a 2017 NSX for a fun toy a few years back. Great car that didn’t sell. Mine had msrp 199K sitting on showroom floor and I walked out paying 127k.
Overall one of the better sports cars I’ve owned.
Last edited by JillyBean; 01-02-2022 at 11:28 AM.
The following 5 users liked this post by JillyBean:
LukeyW (01-24-2022),
msm859 (01-02-2022),
smoove7410 (01-02-2022),
SoonerSpeedFreak (01-15-2022),
Torque Obsessed (06-05-2022)
#59
How shocked would you be if it had a 32 hp two cylinder flex fuel engine?
A total range of over 1000 miles.
Held only 50 pounds of of fuel.
No need to ever plug it in (if you don't have access to a charging station).
Acceleration better than the C7 Z06.
Weighed less than 3900 pounds.
Cost $78,000
Has Super Cruise.
Would you buy the Z06 still?
A total range of over 1000 miles.
Held only 50 pounds of of fuel.
No need to ever plug it in (if you don't have access to a charging station).
Acceleration better than the C7 Z06.
Weighed less than 3900 pounds.
Cost $78,000
Has Super Cruise.
Would you buy the Z06 still?
Last edited by smoove7410; 01-02-2022 at 11:43 AM.
#60
Very interesting discussion.
The “GM” way to do it is the AWD assist motor up front with the LT2 in the back. Parts bin and KISS.
GS2017 brings up a far more radical option. Given his knowledge on the Z06, it wouldn’t surprise me if he’s worked on this 2-cyl range extender already
The “GM” way to do it is the AWD assist motor up front with the LT2 in the back. Parts bin and KISS.
GS2017 brings up a far more radical option. Given his knowledge on the Z06, it wouldn’t surprise me if he’s worked on this 2-cyl range extender already
The following users liked this post:
billwtx22 (01-05-2022)