C8 ERay/Hybrid/EV Discussion ERay/Hybrid/EV Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Vibe Motorsports

E-Rays at the Nurburgring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-2022, 09:35 AM
  #61  
Racer X
Le Mans Master
 
Racer X's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: North Dallas 40 TX
Posts: 6,482
Received 4,394 Likes on 2,079 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by msm859
The new Lyriq will have an AWD version next year that GM says will produce 160 hp more vs the RWD. So where is that motor? I would not consider those leaked motor numbers as the only ones available.
Just because an electric motor can produce a rated power under ideal circumstances, doesn’t mean that as it is installed with controller and programming it will produce that power. They could easily sell the car at a certain power and a year later, offer an OTA update for $5000 that will increase power by 50 HP. Welcome to the new world.
Old 08-21-2022, 10:54 AM
  #62  
St!ngray
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
St!ngray's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 876
Received 253 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

The 3 Ultium motors were announce by GM together with the other components, it was not a leak document.
As far as the plaid it wins even against the above 1000 hp cars. A test was done where the Porche went by a 30 mph instead of a stand still and the Plaid finish 1st.
Old 08-21-2022, 12:13 PM
  #63  
msm859
Melting Slicks
 
msm859's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 3,279
Received 999 Likes on 577 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Racer X
Just because an electric motor can produce a rated power under ideal circumstances, doesn’t mean that as it is installed with controller and programming it will produce that power. They could easily sell the car at a certain power and a year later, offer an OTA update for $5000 that will increase power by 50 HP. Welcome to the new world.
Well that is a non sequitur. I am pretty sure if the RWD is advertised as having 340 hp and GM makes an AWD version and advertises it has 500 hp, that it in fact has 500 hp. Now down the road if they want to offer you an OTA update to add more hp that is a different question. My "point" was GM apparently has a 160 hp electric motor that fits in the front of a car - different from the other previously announced options.
Old 08-21-2022, 12:47 PM
  #64  
Racer X
Le Mans Master
 
Racer X's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: North Dallas 40 TX
Posts: 6,482
Received 4,394 Likes on 2,079 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by msm859
Well that is a non sequitur. I am pretty sure if the RWD is advertised as having 340 hp and GM makes an AWD version and advertises it has 500 hp, that it in fact has 500 hp. Now down the road if they want to offer you an OTA update to add more hp that is a different question. My "point" was GM apparently has a 160 hp electric motor that fits in the front of a car - different from the other previously announced options.
The point is that 160 HP additional with going to a AWD may be coming from the 180kW announced motor that puts out 160 HP in this configuration because that is what the controller allows it to put out. Next year they could give you a 50 HP upgrade for $5k just by changing the software with no change in hardware. That is not inconsistent with any GM announcement.
Old 08-21-2022, 04:47 PM
  #65  
St!ngray
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
St!ngray's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 876
Received 253 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Sorry race X but the 180kW motor produces 235 hp not the 160 hp you claim has been dial back from it. That motor is not design as an AWD, only the 62kW motor is.
Old 08-21-2022, 05:20 PM
  #66  
RedLS6
Drifting
 
RedLS6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Location: Cary NC
Posts: 1,945
Received 1,754 Likes on 794 Posts

Default

Racer X's point is that, just because a motor is rated at 180KW, doesn't mean it absolutely has to put out 180KW in all platforms. If an EV application only needs 150KW for example, maybe due to torque limits or costs or the desire not to place too much power into the target market, it may be more cost effective to just voltage-limit the hypothetical example 180KW motor to 150KW. This comes with tradeoffs too, and as a result they do have different motor sizes to try to target different ranges.
The following 2 users liked this post by RedLS6:
g5harlan (09-08-2022), msm859 (08-21-2022)
Old 08-21-2022, 06:34 PM
  #67  
Racer X
Le Mans Master
 
Racer X's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: North Dallas 40 TX
Posts: 6,482
Received 4,394 Likes on 2,079 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by St!ngray
Sorry race X but the 180kW motor produces 235 hp not the 160 hp you claim has been dial back from it. That motor is not design as an AWD, only the 62kW motor is.
You misinterpret the 62kW motor. Note that it is not a permanent magnet motor. The FWD and RWD systems can be used in tandem for AWD. The motors can be pared at one end for more power. How do you think they got 1000 HP in the Hummer?
Old 08-21-2022, 07:40 PM
  #68  
Racer X
Le Mans Master
 
Racer X's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: North Dallas 40 TX
Posts: 6,482
Received 4,394 Likes on 2,079 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RedLS6
The problem I'm having is that they can't build a small-capacity 10KWh battery from the already-announced Ultium cell, and get 400V. These cells each have a physical dimension of 23x4x0.4 inches, and each cell is 3.7V, and 0.37KWh.

When they connect these Ultium cells in series, they need 108 (3.7V) cells in series, to get 400V. However this yields 40KWh of capacity. Each cell has about 0.37KWh. Could do this, but then weight and cost go up.

If they were to build a 10KWh pack from these cells, they'd need 27 cells in series, but this would only yield 100V which reduces motor power.

Which leads me to believe that there's another unannounced cell physical dimension option for small battery packs.
Couldn't they just step up the voltage to 400V? I realize this adds another energy wasting step, but could they do that?
Old 08-21-2022, 10:16 PM
  #69  
RedLS6
Drifting
 
RedLS6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Location: Cary NC
Posts: 1,945
Received 1,754 Likes on 794 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Racer X
Couldn't they just step up the voltage to 400V? I realize this adds another energy wasting step, but could they do that?
They could do that on the high-voltage side DC Link (battery/inverter/motor). Most of the time, this is done on the charge side; if they were to do it here, they could possibly even use a a thing called a dynamic dc-dc converter, between the battery and the inverter. A dynamic DC-DC modulates the voltage going into the inverter as a function of the motor load, while the inverter modulates the effective motor voltage by modulating the current pulse widths / phases going into the motor. Sometimes you can help system efficiency a little by placing the inverter/motor into a better spot efficiency wise, by modulating the inverter input this way, even though taking a hit on the dc-dc efficiency. At high motor loads, higher voltage into the inverter, and at low loads, lower the voltage into the inverter.

Most DC Links are designed to be a continuous voltage following the kiss rule. An inverter/motor combo is complex and requires a lot of simulation work in the design phase. Add a dynamic DC-DC to the front of this chain, and the sim effort probably quadruples. Then there's the efficiency of the DC-DC. If you counted on a DC-DC to step up from 100V to 400V, you'd also increase the battery current draw by 4X so you have to count those losses as well. Then you also have multiple power domains, Low Voltage, HV High Voltage, and really High Voltage, each requiring separate isolation from the microprocessor sitting in the LV domain.
The following users liked this post:
msm859 (08-21-2022)
Old 08-21-2022, 10:39 PM
  #70  
msm859
Melting Slicks
 
msm859's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 3,279
Received 999 Likes on 577 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RedLS6
They could do that on the high-voltage side DC Link (battery/inverter/motor). Most of the time, this is done on the charge side; if they were to do it here, they could possibly even use a a thing called a dynamic dc-dc converter, between the battery and the inverter. A dynamic DC-DC modulates the voltage going into the inverter as a function of the motor load, while the inverter modulates the effective motor voltage by modulating the current pulse widths / phases going into the motor. Sometimes you can help system efficiency a little by placing the inverter/motor into a better spot efficiency wise, by modulating the inverter input this way, even though taking a hit on the dc-dc efficiency. At high motor loads, higher voltage into the inverter, and at low loads, lower the voltage into the inverter.

Most DC Links are designed to be a continuous voltage following the kiss rule. An inverter/motor combo is complex and requires a lot of simulation work in the design phase. Add a dynamic DC-DC to the front of this chain, and the sim effort probably quadruples. Then there's the efficiency of the DC-DC. If you counted on a DC-DC to step up from 100V to 400V, you'd also increase the battery current draw by 4X so you have to count those losses as well. Then you also have multiple power domains, Low Voltage, HV High Voltage, and really High Voltage, each requiring separate isolation from the microprocessor sitting in the LV domain.
How about cutting both the battery length and width in half. That way you could fit 4 batteries in the same size and have your 400 volts?

Last edited by msm859; 08-22-2022 at 06:29 PM.
Old 08-22-2022, 11:37 AM
  #71  
RedLS6
Drifting
 
RedLS6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Location: Cary NC
Posts: 1,945
Received 1,754 Likes on 794 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by msm859
How about cutting both the battery length and width in half. That was you could fit 4 batteries in the same size and have your 400 volts?
That's what I was thinking of. A volume reduction like that gets the capacity down by a factor of ~4, so now the 3.7V cells deliver 400V at 10KWh instead of at 40KWh. I think the Ultium cells released in the GM videos are slotted for battery packs with a minimum capacity of 40 or 50 KW.
The following users liked this post:
msm859 (08-22-2022)
Old 08-22-2022, 12:26 PM
  #72  
RedLS6
Drifting
 
RedLS6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Location: Cary NC
Posts: 1,945
Received 1,754 Likes on 794 Posts

Default

A pancake motor would have the best shot of slotting in between the engine and the DCT, but not sure how they could fit it in, both space and cost-wise.

Originally Posted by Kodiak Bear
https://www.autoblog.com/2022/08/20/...ic-car-motors/
"Yasa, an Oxford, England-based manufacturer of motors used in Ferrari’s SF90and 296 GTB plug-in hybrids, uses just a few kilograms of iron for its stators, reducing the mass of the machines by as much as 85%".
"Mercedes announced it had acquired Yasa for an undisclosed sum and would put its motors in AMG models slated to launch starting in 2025"

These are the GM motors that have been announced
  • 180 kW front-drive permanent magnet motor
  • 255 kW rear- and front-drive permanent magnet motor
  • 62 kW all-wheel drive assist induction motor
fascinating

You suppose GM will introduce an axial flux motor on the hybrid Corvette? They are testing the SF90..
Old 08-22-2022, 01:58 PM
  #73  
Corvettemac
Racer
 
Corvettemac's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2021
Posts: 358
Received 106 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Racer X
The point is electric car fan”s ideas about how electrics motors work in the real world are wrong. Tesla don’t make full torque at zero RPM or even 1 RPM. It is clearly shown in a Tesla dyno. Because they are generally direct drive (Tesla is) with no clutch they don’t function in the same way as a gas car.

Also the motors alone don’t determine the HP electric cars make. The batteries and controller does too. Why do you think Teslas make less HP at half capacity. Whereas a gas car will make the same power with half a tank of fuel.

Oh and motor torque alone does not determine acceleration. Otherwise diesel trucks would out accelerate Corvettes, and they don’t.

It is very clear many posters don’t understand basic physics, and believe many myths.
It is clear your electrical engineering or physics classes missed a lecture or two on Hybrids . Because as smart as you think you are . You are comparing EV’s to HYBRIDS ! They are not the same .

Single phase vs dual phase motors also can influence overall power input .

And lastly whether you believe it or not the Eray will make roughly 600 HP .
I wouldn't be surprised if its rated for more ( despite your best objections )


Old 08-22-2022, 02:03 PM
  #74  
Corvettemac
Racer
 
Corvettemac's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2021
Posts: 358
Received 106 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RedLS6
A pancake motor would have the best shot of slotting in between the engine and the DCT, but not sure how they could fit it in, both space and cost-wise.
I think they are going to stack a battery in the tunnel or underneath the floor . This will lower and depolarize the center of mass in the car . FRUNK will prob exist but be smaller as those are where the motors will go .
Old 08-22-2022, 03:47 PM
  #75  
Racer X
Le Mans Master
 
Racer X's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: North Dallas 40 TX
Posts: 6,482
Received 4,394 Likes on 2,079 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Corvettemac
It is clear your electrical engineering or physics classes missed a lecture or two on Hybrids . Because as smart as you think you are . You are comparing EV’s to HYBRIDS ! They are not the same .

Single phase vs dual phase motors also can influence overall power input .

And lastly whether you believe it or not the Eray will make roughly 600 HP .
I wouldn't be surprised if its rated for more ( despite your best objections )
I haven't said anything about how much power the car will or will not put out.

I have talked about how GM can use electric motors rated to a specific publicized output, and how they can put out different power when in a specific car, based on their specific control systems and programming. I am sorry if you cannot understand that.

So you are telling me that hybrids with an independent electric drive motor and axle, puts power down and functions differently than an independent electric drive motor and axle in an all electric car? You will have to explain the physics of that.
Old 08-22-2022, 05:17 PM
  #76  
St!ngray
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
St!ngray's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 876
Received 253 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Racerx and MSM859 are speculating about a 160 hp motor just because the New Cadilac Lyric with a single rear motor is advertise by GM (Cadilac) as 340 hp, which comes from the single 255kW Ultium motor.
The same Lyric with AWD and 2 motors puts out 500hp which prompted MSM859 to speculate there might be a newer Ultium motor.
However, the more possibly explanation rather than take the 180-kW motor rated at 245 and re tuned it to a lower output (per RACERX), Cadilac could just be putting 2 180kW motors for a total of 500 hp



Quick Reply: E-Rays at the Nurburgring



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 PM.