When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The majority of Twin Turbo C8s I've seen are bottom mounted, with many of those originating as kit systems from ETS (Extreme Turbo Systems). Cicio and Jotech seem to have many bottom mount installations under their belts. LMR (Latemodel Racecraft) seems to have focused on the top mounted approach and have been very successful with their drag strip results.
What do you all see as the Pros/Cons of Top VS Bottom mounted Twin Turbos on the C8? Installation? Cooling? Appearance? Efficiency? Reliability? Performance? Other?
Also, please feel free to add any other insight/perspective you might have on Twin Turbos in general.
Bottom mount seems like it’d be easier overall to install. Should be cooler too since the turbos aren’t in the engine bay and provide better weight balance. Not sure if it’s due to a lack of space but you’ll notice most TT lambos/r8s have it bottom mounted.
The majority of Twin Turbo C8s I've seen are bottom mounted, with many of those originating as kit systems from ETS (Extreme Turbo Systems). Cicio and Jotech seem to have many bottom mount installations under their belts. LMR (Latemodel Racecraft) seems to have focused on the top mounted approach and have been very successful with their drag strip results.
What do you all see as the Pros/Cons of Top VS Bottom mounted Twin Turbos on the C8? Installation? Cooling? Appearance? Efficiency? Reliability? Performance? Other?
Also, please feel free to add any other insight/perspective you might have on Twin Turbos in general.
Both systems work well from what we have seen.
The main advantage of the bottom mount is that it works with both Coupes and HTC Models whereas the top mount system does not.
The bottom mount will keep more heat out of the engine bay as well.
An advantage of the top mount kit is that you can reuse the factory cats and exhaust but in our experience anyone looking to turbo their C8 will want to swap these OEM exhaust components out anyways.
Top mounts are going to spool faster than rear(bottom mounts) but most of these systems are used on the street where most won't notice a difference. If I were building one, I would start with a custom header 1 3/4 stepped down to a 1 5/8" into a merge collector with a 2" down to the turbo. Wrap or coat everything for thermal retention and blanket the turbo.
Top mounts are going to spool faster than rear(bottom mounts) but most of these systems are used on the street where most won't notice a difference. If I were building one, I would start with a custom header 1 3/4 stepped down to a 1 5/8" into a merge collector with a 2" down to the turbo. Wrap or coat everything for thermal retention and blanket the turbo.
Phil
Thanks Phil,
Is the recommended step down in the header size to increase exhaust flow to the turbo? Faster spool up?
Thanks Phil,
Is the recommended step down in the header size to increase exhaust flow to the turbo? Faster spool up?
Yes, turbos rely on drive pressure to generate boost. Correctly sizes headers and connection piping will allow faster spool with a larger turbine resulting in lower backpressure at high boost levels.
Fwiw my last setup had 1 3/4" headers and a 2.5" combination and made north of 2500(450 ci canted valve LS). So anyone who tells you it won't work is wrong. It's all about velocity. I did enough testing to completely drain the wallet. 1 3/4 1 7/8 2" headers, 2.5/2.75/3" connections. Gas and alcohol.
Yes, turbos rely on drive pressure to generate boost. Correctly sizes headers and connection piping will allow faster spool with a larger turbine resulting in lower backpressure at high boost levels.
Fwiw my last setup had 1 3/4" headers and a 2.5" combination and made north of 2500(450 ci canted valve LS). So anyone who tells you it won't work is wrong. It's all about velocity. I did enough testing to completely drain the wallet. 1 3/4 1 7/8 2" headers, 2.5/2.75/3" connections. Gas and alcohol.
Thanks for the additional explanation. Makes sense. On the flip side, could reducing the exhaust/header diameter have any detrimental impact on the factory calibrated performance? For example, if you weren't driving turbos and only reduced the exhaust size, you normally would expect a decrease in performance, right? But, I'm guessing that the increased boost would outweigh the "normal" performance reduction you might expect. ?
Thanks for the additional explanation. Makes sense. On the flip side, could reducing the exhaust/header diameter have any detrimental impact on the factory calibrated performance? For example, if you weren't driving turbos and only reduced the exhaust size, you normally would expect a decrease in performance, right? But, I'm guessing that the increased boost would outweigh the "normal" performance reduction you might expect. ?
The motor is going to be either setup for boost or NA. For boosted application the question is will you see less performance between 800 rpms and 2500 when the turbos start to work. The c8 motor from the factory has been bred to make 500hp but remember it's always a trade off. Power up top for power down low.
Your probably thinking there is no way tubes this small can be efficient. Think about your exhaust valve cross section at the valve seat and the turbine at the nozzle entry point.
Last edited by 95mmrenegade; Jan 3, 2023 at 07:27 AM.
trade offs. Top mounts allow the turbos to snug up to the exh port tighter for spooling, and can gravity drain the oil going back to the pan
rear mounts as mentioned will keep things cool and be easier to boost the vert
either way, the c8 will go like stink with the turbos spooled. The c8 with the dct won't suffer too much off boost in the lower rpms as the deep lower gears will get the rpms up quickly to spool.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.